What is the advantage of a dissenting voice in a democracy?
I think it's great for shifitng your vantage point or, at least, it gives the opposition something to attack.
I'm not even sure of the advantage of having a democracy, we in the U.S. don't know what the word means anymore.
One advantage of a dissenting voice in a democracy is to assure accountability of our politicians; it also keeps the politicians more in touch with the people's desires and dislikes. Dissenting voices from the people is a force that assures freedoms, liberties, and the pursuit of happiness.
It gives the sheeple (sheep people) a scapegoat when their majority screws everything up (as usual). "If only everyone were on board... (with our insanity), THEN it would have worked."
I'd have to agree with dabeaner that that's pretty much how it works in government. However, if people were willing to reap the benefits of a dissenting voice, that voice can help add another way of thinking and another point of view that others may or may not have even thought of. Even if they don't agree with the point being made, it offers something else for thorough examination that could help everyone involved better understand the ramifications of their decision.
The fact is, America is not a Democracy. It's a Republic. We have virtual representation by an elected leader, instead of a monarch. That's a Republic. In a true democracy, there would be LOTS of dissenting voices, since every law would come from a mandate from the masses, not from the mind of a single leader or government body like Congress.
However, in a Republic, like the United States (Which is not a democracy) the dissenting voice is always there as a warning for those in power, to remind them that all administrations are limited, and there is someone waiting to kick them out when their term is done, and turn power over to their rival party. The sole party in charge would have no check on their behavior because there would be nothing for them to lose, if there was no one to argue with them. Its only the dread of losing office to the rival party that makes the majority voice do anything good at all. If a dissenting voice can turn enough people away from the lords on top, then the government is replaced by a new administration. That's why our leaders have to be wary of dissent. Caesar used to have a Fool walk behind him to remind of of this. the fool used to whisper in his ear "All power is fleeting."
According to standpoint theory, the dissenting voice is usually someone who is more likely to see the flaws in society. Take good ol' America for example. A white, middle class, married heterosexual christian male will be treated relatively good by the system, and therefore less likely to see any flaws. But a hispanic gay female atheist living in poverty is going to see a lot of problems. The role of dissenter is not the "anarchistic" role the word 'dissent' often conjures. it is someone who recognizes these flaws, and tries to bring this knowledge to people who are less in a position to recognize them.
BTW - Robwrite. A Republic can be a Democracy. It can also be a Dictatorship, or any other form of power sharing. The proper way to describe America is Oligarchy. Canada is an oligarchy too. It's also a Monarchy (as opposed to a Republic).
by lady_love158 7 years ago
http://biggovernment.com/rlaurie/2011/0 … o-success/Lol!This is hilarious because it's sooo true!
by My Esoteric 22 months ago
In both the Federalist Papers AND the Constitutional Convention, it is extremely clear the distaste most of those involved in creating today's America had for democracy, which they saw as mob rule which allows "emotion" rather than "reason" to drive important decisions.Friday's...
by SportsBetter 6 years ago
Is the United States a Republic or a Democracy?So most people believe the United States is a Democracy. The US was actually founded as a Republic. Some of the founders had put much thought in what they wanted the country to be. They knew that all of the previous democracies in the...
by Christin Sander 4 years ago
Do all governments use fear and hatred to push their own agendas?Is there such thing as a wholly non-corrupt government, or do they all manipulate people with propaganda? Do you think it would be possible to truly have a government "of and for the people" - or is corruption completely...
by Kieron Walker 4 years ago
If you could tweak one thing about democracy in general, what would it be?
by Dan Harmon 4 years ago
I picked up a FaceBook post today that I find very interesting:In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh,had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|