One World Gov't. Are you ready?

Jump to Last Post 1-49 of 49 discussions (150 posts)

66
aka-djposted 14 years ago
Here is a 4 min video. You (we) are about to give up our freedom(s).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

What do you think?
reply report
1. 0
  EmpressFelicityposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yikes. Sounds like the thin end of a very large and painful wedge. And I bet none of this is actually going to benefit Third World countries either.
  
  Here's a copy of an article going into more detail about the Copenhagen treaty:
  
  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … #printMode
  reply report
2. 61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  
  I love this !
  What did you expect ?
  America was founded by Freemasons, and they have been waiting all this years for this time to come.
  Freemasons don't care for U.S.A.
  Their only goal is power for themselves. And now they're going to get it.
  They've bee waiting for more than 300 years. Do you think they won't succeed? Get Real !
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, but which faction of freemasons founded this country and which faction rules it now? They seem quite different to me
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  they are only one. You've been deceived from the start. If you can't see that ...
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Oh no, there are at least two. One black and one white. One important symbol of freemasonry is the black and white checkerboard floor.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Excuse me.
  there are a lot of freemasons all over the world. I can say I'm a freemason. Who could say I'm not ?
  The freemasons you hear about in books, youtube, google etc, are not 'THE'Freemasons. 'THE' Freemasons t don't go in the media, and you wouldn't even imagine who they are!
  But they are only 'ONE'. And they are the ones behind the 'freemasons' faces behind the New World Order.
  And they are the ones that founded your country, wether you like it or not .
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  There is more to it than that. I'm not trying to convince you - think what you like. But there is most definitely more than one faction, and they're not at peace with each other.
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Unless you are a 33rd degree mason Tantrum- I don't think you get the big picture. Then if you were that high, which you never could be(gender), you would realize that even masonry is a small portion of an even larger society.
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  That's accurate
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Well that's waht I'm saying isn't it. It's something else
  And about the 33 degree. Don't make me laugh
  If you know about it , of course it's not the real thing. do you think they're stupid ?
  reply report
  0
  A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Spiritually, they're the stupidest people on the planet.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I see you don't have a clue
  whatever
  The future will tell who was right
  
  Enjoy your life
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  @ sooner
  
  This is what I've been saying that nobody believes
  If that is nothing .....
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  not news to me.
  now that I see you did try to make a point.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  @texan
  My point
  reply report
3. 0
  skylinerj34posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Are we like children in America who believes whatever daddy says?
  Seriously?
  reply report
  63
  Ralph Deedsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Monckton is a pompous right wing extremist Thatcherite ideologue. Predictably although he has no scientific training he bloviates against the scientific evidence of global climate change.
  reply report
60
VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years ago
If the present United Nations Organisation gives up its
partiality,
if the member countries honour the UN charter,
If there is no discrimination against some countries,
if some countries gives up calling themselves "developed",
if some countries are not branded as "developing"
and "underdeveloped",
if every country honour the existence of other countries,
the present world itself will be like one country- one
world with UNO as its government. Will that dream come
true?
reply report
0
Madame Xposted 14 years ago
It's not a "dream" - more like a nightmare. America is where she is because of the goodness and hard work of it's people, and in spite of the loonies who run things on occasion. If other countries got their act together they would have what America has. And at the root of what America has is self respect that comes from acknowledging the inalienable rights of every human being.

We don't need a "world government" to have that.
reply report
1. 60
  VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  One world government will be better without America which boasts for anything and everything they have naturally.
  reply report
  0
  Poppa Bluesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Really? That's gratitude for ya! Fine with me! Let the rest of the globe form a government and leave us out of it! I'm tired of sending my hard earned money to an ungrateful globe!
  reply report
  0
  poetlorraineposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  what
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Excuse Poppa Blues but the USA has a massive debt, more debt than any other economy. Would you care to explain what money you have sent around the globe?
  reply report
  58
  Pr0metheusposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  It's in the form of bullets, missiles and bombs... DUH
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Ok, we won't join and the rest of you can fend for yourselves. You won't last five minutes.
  reply report
  68
  Universal Lawsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Lets have a bit of truth here, the US like the UK have looted and destroyed the resources of the third world countries for decades, they never needed us (UK) or you the US and would have been better off without either of us. Take responsibility for what they have done in your name. If you think the US is "civilised" then you have believed your own propaganda, nobody else believes it. You have the most corrupt and lying government to every be in power. Check out the disclosure movement - 400 strong and gathering momentum. Your money has been going to block ops not 3rd world countries. You, like the UK, have been bankrupt for decades and only survive on false economy and figures. Start to blow holes in your own illusory bubble.
  reply report
  0
  Poppa Bluesposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yeah! You guys (the UK) and the rest of Europe didn't need us when Hitler was over running your continent... eah nothing the USA ever did was any good for anybody!
  
  That's precisely the attitude we have to put up with here. Our consumption alone is raising the living standards of millions of people in China, India, Malaysia, Thailand and around the globe. Are people being exploited? Of course! But you can't lay the blame for that on the doorstep of the USA! Look at Cuba, we haven't done business with them for 40 years and that country is a mess! Is that our fault too? Is Darfur our fault? Saudi Arabia? Russia? Pulease!
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  America is the last and only beacon of freedom in the world - and we're trying to hold on to that with our last dying breath here - in spite of European interference all the way back from the 1840's. England couldn't get "the colonies" back through war, so they attacked from within and we've been trying to fight them off ever since. You think it's Americans who interfere in third world, and every other economy? Think again. And read some history.
  reply report
  68
  Universal Lawsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I dont think you read what I said - I included UK in this destruction and exploitation of 3rd world countries and I believe its you that needs to read up on the real history. UK, our crown and the parts of the illuminatti that are English still run your country with your governments - they are in it together. You have housed the NAZI scientists and used their knowledge since WW2, you transported them out of Germany to your own country and they are running the black ops space programmes and advanced energy processes for you. Wake Up, its time to smell your own manure heap. I certainly am aware of the manure heap from the British. Its not right, never has been but its the truth, the US and the UK have everything to answer for - so called developed world came through UK and US and what a mess. Please dont comment again if you have not read my reply
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You do have a point. this country was founded on a government and morals that I think anybody would want to fight for. But the fact that we were tainted(unknowingly) by infiltration of the illuminati and its subsidaries like the free masons makes the trip a little harder to recognize. Many still think we are fighting for all the right reasons, while the strings of the puppeteres are yanked and loosed.
  reply report
  0
  A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Very nice, i like your thinking.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  It better be. And don't come bitching to us when y'all start killing each other.
  reply report
0
Poppa Bluesposted 14 years ago
This is very scary!
reply report
60
Jonathan Jancoposted 14 years ago
Actually, we've pretty much had a World Government for quite sometime. The WTO, World Bank, IMF and the Fed are all privately owned, unaccountable institutions of tyranny that most sovereign nations do not have the resources to counter. Plus, they have the world economy in a stranglehold.
reply report
1. 74
  Eaglekiwiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Yea I agree , which makes the full transition all that more unnoticable.
  
  I guess its inevitable.
  reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
From the North American Union to a transnational world "government" on a scale the world has never before seen.

When do you suppose our elected officials plan to clue us in on all this bull shit?

I wonder if they actually think they can get away with it?

I believe it's time for a Bloodless Revolution.
reply report
64
Ivorwenposted 14 years ago
Couldn't agree more with you, Poppa.
reply report
66
Flightkeeperposted 14 years ago
I wish they would kick us out. Let them deal with all their headaches. Besides we can't afford to give any more money out.
reply report
0
Denno66posted 14 years ago
A wonderful relationship; like drug pushers/junkies. One without the other is a painful thing to see.
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
ohh, all work of the devil btw.
reply report
1. 61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Sure !
  reply report
61
tantrumposted 14 years ago
@ madame x
that's what they want you to believe !
I'm not saying anything more.
You will see I'm right .But by then it will be too late.
and you know why ?. Because it's meant to be. And nothing can go against this Power
reply report
1. 60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Funny that it is predicted in the bible. end times.
  reply report
  79
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  So is just about any nasty thing you can imagine. Take your pick!
  reply report
2. 0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  This power???
  
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  the one who laughs last, laughs best
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You think it's funny ?
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I think you're funny !
  so short minded
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Can't make your point?
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I've made my point
  Maybe you need a guide book ?
  reply report
  0
  A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Whats your point?
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Don't you know how to read?
  My point is in 5 words:
  Why can't you get real ?
  It's so difficult ?
  reply report
  0
  A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Real? Am I not real? Whats your point?
  reply report
  0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Since you've now resorted to rudeness and insults it somehow occurred to my "short mind" that you can't back up what you're saying.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Insults ?
  Sorry then. If you can't take the 'short mind' thing.
  I'm realy sorry!
  I'm backing up what I'm saying,saying what I know about freemasons.
  As I said before, I'm not going to say anything else.
  Believe it or not. It's your choice, not mine
  I've made my choice already !
  Enjoy your life !
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Everyone believes it! You don't realize that? Wow. Do I need to spin in my chair 20 times and get real dizzy and confused before talking with you? put the pipe down or walk away. you havn't said anything.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Really ?
  
  reply report
0
A Texanposted 14 years ago
Harry S. Truman was a 33 degree Mason, he was also the 33rd President! Weird!!!
reply report
61
UPStarposted 14 years ago
Whats scary to me is people hear this and dont get it or care.
reply report
1. 74
  Eaglekiwiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I think its because the average joe lunchbox is powerless to do anything (except talk about it)
  reply report
69
rhamsonposted 14 years ago
I actually heard about this scenario from the Clinton day's and the NAFTA negotiations. Bush had some dealings with it as well with blending of the borders controversy.

I really want to see what happens when it gets in front of congress and the supreme court. That is when the real stuff will hit the fan.

Wait a minute isn't that why we have these fail safes in place?

Oh I forgot the Obama troops are going to come and take me away.

You guys occupy yourself with some mindless dribble sometimes.

It's good to know alarmist tactics are alive and well in America.
reply report
1. 0
  Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Obama has his own troops now?
  reply report
  69
  rhamsonposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  He's going to have to, to overturn our Constitution. Have you read it lately?
  reply report
  66
  Flightkeeperposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Well that's okay, he thinks the Constitution is a bunch of negative rights anyway. Things that the government can't do. He can't wait to rewrite it.
  reply report
  69
  rhamsonposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  If he can get it by congress and the supreme court he must be the anti christ I have heard about.
  reply report
  0
  Denno66posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Actually, every commander-in-chief does. His personal, per se, no, but he does occupy the pinnacle of command in the Armed Forces.
  reply report
2. 60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I'm sorry, but I live in a city with the Canamex Highway being constructed through NOW- as you type your sceptacism. Furthermore my Mexican vacation home is tooooooo close to the new port that the US is building for Mexico. Tell me our borders arent coming down.
  reply report
3. 0
  Denno66posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  On both sides of the aisle, unfortunately.
  reply report
  69
  rhamsonposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Quite right!
  reply report
40
gusripperposted 14 years ago
Why ?Is anybody believes that the countries have seperate goverments and that they dont give explenations every day to the BIG BROTHER?Which is change every 100 yrs.
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
Well for one, many of us knew this was an agenda longer than members of these satanic societies because of prophecy and because we see the changes happening before our eyes.

who has the laugh in the end. I suggest it is not the infiltrator. no matter how small your part.

just makes me excited.
reply report
0
Denno66posted 14 years ago
Hmm, sounds like echoes from the last Administration's detractors, and the ones before that, rinse, lather, repeat.
reply report
1. 60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Buckle up and enjoy your ride. Even you will be surprised by the new loops ahead.
  reply report
  0
  Denno66posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Nothing very much surprises me anymore.
  reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
So Tantrum, what is your involvement in masonry? do you participate in parades and makeshift charity efforts, or do you like to partake in the amature acting involved?
reply report
1. 61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Oh!, Is that masonry ? I see.... I pass
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  thought so. Stop pretending you know all the dirty secrets. I know more than you.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  
  what dirty secrets ?
  
  Yes it seems you know more than me.
  About foolishness
  reply report
59
tksenseiposted 14 years ago
................
reply report
0
Denno66posted 14 years ago
And now a word from our sponsors.....
reply report
1. 60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  haha- that is funny. I know we cannot agree, but humorous never the less.
  reply report
59
The Grey Wolfposted 14 years ago
OMG HOW DO WE STOP THIS!!!

This scares the shit out of me! Call the michigan militia and break out the nukes!!!
reply report
0
Denno66posted 14 years ago
Lotta things are funny, this is jus one of 'em. ;p
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
indeed.
reply report
59
The Grey Wolfposted 14 years ago
From the halls of montezuma to the shores of tripoli, we are all tools of the conspiricy!

Why is it that whenever something like this comes out the "eccentrics" with the Illuminati and MJ12 and Free Mason theories all come out of the wood work. No organazation could last as long as they suposedly have with out leaving evidence. That or a really influential immortal at the helm. As they say "The only way for three people to keep a secret is for two to be dead."

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it HAS to be a tool of the conspiricy.

Remember kiddies, don't devide by zero...
reply report
1. 60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  ask Tantrum.
  reply report
2. 68
  Universal Lawsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  When you have watched every brave whistle blower risking their lives to tell the world the truth from www.projectcamelot.org then see whether you are so sarcastic! Do you dare even take a look!
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  "Our focus is an investigation into (but is not limited to) the following: extraterrestrial visitation and contact, time travel, mind control, classified advanced technology, free energy, possible coming earth changes, and revealing plans that exist to control the human race."
  
  Nuts and fruitcakes for sale!
  reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
This is getting interesting. Hey tantrum maybe you could clue us in on the connection between the upper degree freemasons and baphomet? But then if you are a female (?) it would be the connection between the Order of the Eastern Star and baphomet, though wouldn't it?
reply report
1. 61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  
  Freemasons and baphomet !
  
  Chris Angel & Christ
  Obama and Satan
  
  Pleaseee !!
  reply report
74
Eaglekiwiposted 14 years ago
Im ready
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
Baphonet is a major part of free masonry, and free masonry is a minor part of something bigger. but just for fun, watch some Walt Disney(33rd degree mason) movies. Notice most characters exhibit Baphonet hand symbols throughout the movies. Little Mermaid, aladin, the list is endless. Then look at your political leaders making Baphonet hand signs throughout history.

I will bet most don't wave at anyone with the symbol of the goat(devil). You might see it happen at rock concerts, and people think that they are giving some sort of "rock and roll" sign, but most know that it is the sign of the devil. Interesting when you know who controls the music industry. Even more crazy is some lyrics that make it into songs.

Someone said that it is "strange" that these groups have not exposed themself. Sure they have, time and time again. People have even left the Illuminati and talked about it. Many came up missing. They also expose themselves with symbols and imagery. It is one of mans inner most sinful desires to belong to something secret.
reply report
1. 61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Come on !!
  Yes , I forgot !
  rock and roll & the devil
  What has that to do with freemasonry ?
  
  You're so mixed up !
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  stop spinning your chair dizzy t. we are talking about Baphonets hand symbols.
  
  did you not get enough sleep? you are usually sharper than this.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  maybe you need some sleep !!
  all that google, or new age books, or youtube videos nonsense about freemasons symbolism !
  You should know better !
  and BTW,I can't care less what you think of me.
  As I don't like the way you think !
  reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
easy dizzy T. pinch and pull, those panties are bundling.

you are making me sleepy. yawn. there, you only deserve one smile for getting a little agitated.
reply report
60
Centum Anavaposted 14 years ago
this crap has been going on for a long time now and many people are still so blind. the people who control the world are the owners of the world's banks and these are privately owned. money is never lost it is merely transferred the internet is a great outlet for this stuff
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
Sure it is. There is no light in the subject, so it would be safe to assume that God has nothing to do with it. Then when one learns who is doing what and the indications of the devil are discovered- it becomes really deep.

I often wondered about conspiracies before I knew Jesus. Now, I know that there is more to things.
reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
I read a good comment on a Hub today, "I have read the 'end of the book' and guess what - God wins!"

You seem to be on the wrong team tantrum.
reply report
1. 66
  aka-djposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  She has camped in many fields. All on the wrong side of the line.
  Although there isa comfort in numbers. Multitudes of them!
  Sadly, the call to defect has gone not only unheeded, but been resisted with much malice asnd ridicule.
  reply report
  61
  tantrumposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  
  I love camping in many fields !
  luckily they are not your 'fields' nor sooner's!
  
  if I have to describe both of you, I should say :
  'Short minds, long delusions'
  
  Enjoy your life ! (if you know how )
  reply report
  66
  aka-djposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I do indeed. I'm here on Hubpages, am I not?
  reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
Part of the article provided by Empress's link on page one.

Interviewed by broadcaster Alan Jones on Sydney radio Monday, Lord Monckton said "this is the first time I've ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a 'government.' But it's the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening." He added: "The sheer ambition of this new world government is enormous right from the start—that's even before it starts accreting powers to itself in the way that these entities inevitably always do."

aaaahhhhhhh!!!!
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
earnest, 7,000 posts. coming up.
reply report
1. 79
  earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you, and noted. Alan Jones has one of the smallest brains in the country. He is a dishonest commentator in my view and a dishonest person as well.
  Shock Jock!
  The world government cannot happen, too much diversity in thinking. We would have to solve the human condition first.
  reply report
  60
  sooner than laterposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  thats what is said about many things that get voted through, why is this even going to be on the table is what I want to know. I don't eat turkey dinner with dog poo next to me.
  reply report
  0
  Ghost32posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  More like "dissolve" the human condition...as in a vat of extremely corrosive acid. "Solving" the human condition implies that said condition is a problem. To me, it's our salvation--not religious salvation, but the only real bulwark resisting the one world government. I do agree with you, Earnest, that it IS such a bulwark.
  
  Even so, I'm not terribly comfortable with the idea that the world government "cannot" happen. "Not bloody likely", that I could buy (with hope in my eye), but far too many former and obvious impossibilities of yesterday are the facts of today for me to ever become complacent.
  reply report
79
earnestshubposted 14 years ago
Solution.
All military leaders have to have their lizard brain hooked up to a galvanic probe to diminish fight or flight responses.

Politicians to have psychological tests for neurosis before appointment.
All decision makers must have a pre-determined access to an acceptable level of seratonin, and normal response to dopamine.
Brain waves normal.
reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
Well let's face it tantrum, it was you that brought your freemasons into this conversation about a one world government.

Most of the world realizes the connection between the higher degree freemasons, the Order of the Eastern Star and baphomet and the dark side. As far as delusions that you think people have then go ahead, enlighten us tantrum. The practitioners of kaos magick that try to conjure up baphomet are they higher degree freemasons, members of the order of the eastern star, the cabala, rosicrucians or all of the above?

It's only characters like you that dred Friday the 13th and you know why.
reply report
1. 59
  The Grey Wolfposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Is that a Templar reference?
  
  AND I SAY AGAIN...
  
  The only way for three people to keep a secret is for two to be dead. Gods, this is like beating a dead horse...
  Further, whats wrong with darkness?
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You are beating Benjamin Franklin's dead horse.
  reply report
63
Ralph Deedsposted 14 years ago
World government isn't likely. However, stronger international institutions are needed to deal with issues that affect the world or many countries. For example: arms control and reduction, pollution and climate change issues, copyright enforcement, disease epidemics that spread quickly across national boundaries, fishery conservation, international trade issues, offshore tax evasion schemes, increasing piracy at sea due to failed national governments, drug trafficing, and last but not least, international terrorism which will require cooperation among all nations if we are to deal effectively with it.

We should not let unrealistic fears of "international government" deter us from international cooperation!
reply report
1. 0
  Ghost32posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I thoroughly agree, Ralph. The operative word being "unrealistic", of course. In fact, the entire debate pretty well boils down to differences of opinion of what constitutes an unrealistic fear of international government and what constitutes a grim yet realistic fear of international government.
  
  Fortunately or unfortunately, Maxwell Maltz illustrated that point clearly in his classic book (Psychocybernetics) when he gave the example of a man who encountered a bear while hiking a mountain trail. Terrified, the man rushed back the way he had come, loudly informing other hikers of the furry black menace lurking just around the next corner. Undeterred, those hikers kept going...and found that the threatening object was not a bear at all, but a tree stump that simply LOOKED like a bear in the fading evening light.
  
  Since the first man had kept running, he never learned that, and to this day he believes he nearly lost his life to a real bear. The point being, the human mind is literally unable to differentiate between an experience that is vividly imagined and one that really happened. Which makes your point exactly.
  
  HOWEVER, the reverse could as easily be true. The first hiker could have passed the shadowy lump sitting beside the trail and thought nothing of it: "Ah, no big; just a tree stump." Then the next hikers come along, the tree stump turns out to be a bear, and the bear eats the hikers. Yet the first hiker, heading on over the ridge on a one way journey, never learns of this...and believes to this day that he had a simple, peaceful, safe stroll from one side of the mountain to the other.
  
  So: Would a truly forceful international government turn out to be a cranky, hungry bear (as I firmly believe) or a simple, peaceful tree stump where one might sit and rest while enjoying a sandwich (as you firmly believe)?
  
  A neutral third party might well consider this a valid question. For my part...I'd just like to stay out of the woods.
  reply report
63
Ralph Deedsposted 14 years ago
aka-dj wrote:

Here is a 4 min video. You (we) are about to give up our freedom(s).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

What do you think?

I think Christopher Monckton is a right wing fraud and a pompous ass.
reply report
60
sooner than laterposted 14 years ago
I read the meat and potato's of the report, and there is reason for concern.
reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
Ralph international cooperation can already happen through the United Nations (well not quite all the time cause of the five veto-wielding permanent Security Council member countries). But anyways we do not need a one world government that steps on the rights of nations for international cooperation.
reply report
1. 61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  The allies, the UN, the free world, democracy, all that blah, sorry to break the news but these are institutions that tread on the world on a daily basis.
  
  The freedoms of the West are protected by careful maintenance of the balance of power. Allied forces protect financial interests more than those of suffering. Where was big Uncle Sam for Cambodia? Why couldn't Uncle Sam save the genocide in Bosnia? Why does big Uncle Sam in all his big Uncle, richly moral and Gods favourite son, why??? Why does he not feed the poor? Uncle Sam doesn't feed his own never mind any other folk. The United Nations is just another arm of America, America just the puppet face of the few moguls and corporates that control our world.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/moneymatt … amiaid.htm
  
  http://www.usaid.gov/locations/sub-saharan_africa/
  
  http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008 … urma_N.htm
  
  http://communities.canada.com/ottawacit … -dart.aspx
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Interesting reply,
  
  I offer you this,
  
  http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/17/busin … hardt.html
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  try this one on for size,
  
  http://article.wn.com/view/2007/12/26/T … _politics/
  reply report
2. 63
  Ralph Deedsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I agree that we don't need a one world government, and I haven't seen anything that makes me worried that we are headed for one. We do need more cooperation to find solutions to problems that cross national boundaries.
  reply report
58
Pr0metheusposted 14 years ago
Screw making a tier I civilization... I vote for destroying ourselves!
reply report
1. 0
  Ghost32posted 14 years agoin reply to this
  A popular option!
  reply report
60
freedomdebtreviewposted 14 years ago
Will not work.
reply report
59
tksenseiposted 14 years ago
Oh, we don't give enough of our money to others? We don't divide it up the way you want? Maybe we need you to come write the budget so we can sleep at night knowing you like us...

...then we can get into all the private donations Americans make. Maybe you can help organize that as well.
reply report
1. 61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  What exactly are you trying to suggest here? I offered you an article stating the massive amount of money being fed into the most ridiculous war of this generation thus far.
  
  When Cambodia suffered at the hands of Pol Pot, America went to Vietnam. Sadam may have been a terrible human being and a money hungry dictator with blood on his hands but there are dictators else where.
  
  If all you want to contribute to the mass of knowledge that is human intelligence, perhaps raise the bar a little from ego bruised sarcasm and right wing patriotic slander of the figures. Thats all I'm offering you is an opinion, you don't like it, fine by me. But, if you want to get hung up about the truth and throw out your hotlinks, I apologise for my assumption that you where open to reasonable discussion.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  I'm suggesting that it is incredibly presumptuous of you to pass judgement on the US for how much aid we offer to the rest of the world, whether you agree with the Iraq War or not.
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Let me stress this point. I am not presuming anything. I do however pass judgement. I do not judge the US entirely based on its commitment to international aid but I do believe it is a worth contrast of figures to look at the war in the middle east and the aid to sub-saharan africa. If you do not understand how this is relevant, I cannot think any way of making it more clear and thus we part ways in opinion.
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  To take this away from the personal and back to the topic let me add this. It is not American citizen I have a gripe with. It is America as a symbol of greed. The American government is not my issue either. It is the corporations that run not only America but the UK, Africa, Europe and so on. I have a great respect for American culture, particularly the great writers. American people have done a lot of good for the world, yes. It is the abuse of power which is a problem. At the end of it all, it wouldn't matter who was at the top. It has been many nations in the past. African nations, British, French all the way back to Persia. Sorry if I offended anyone, I should be more careful with my language.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You've got your timeline mixed up.
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Oh? I'm starting to think this is not about anything more than tit for tat. Fine, done. You win. If you want do discuss anything further, contact me some other way as I surrender this discussion with you seeing how you only wish to attack my opinion and do so with no apparent intention other than attack for its own sake. Thanks for the history lesson.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  This was a simple point of fact. Nothing to get offended about.
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Just to rub it in a bit tk, Vietnam and Cambodia overlapped for some time, when the worst of the War was happening in Cambodia, America refused to pull troops out of Vietnam, sacrificing lives for a war that would never be won, while Cambodia was sentenced to genocide.
  reply report
  59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  http://tc-imc.serve.com/2008/sep/cambod … 000-deaths
  
  http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1959.html
  
  You just keep doing better and better, huh?
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  From your link, http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1959.html,
  
  1973:Khmer Rouge troops, under Pol Pot, begin to take over the country, after U.S. soldiers withdraw,
  
  http://tc-imc.serve.com/2008/sep/cambod … 000-deaths
  Cambodia Genocide (Pol Pot) - 1975-1979 - ,
  
  By 1975, the U.S. had withdrawn its troops from Vietnam. Cambodia's government, plagued by corruption and incompetence, also lost its American military support. Taking advantage of the opportunity, Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge army, consisting of teenage peasant guerrillas, marched into Phnom Penh and on April 17 effectively seized control of Cambodia.
  reply report
  61
  Bovine Currencyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  In short tk, Nixon should have protect Cambodia in the first instance and even after 1975, another 2 million were killed. My question stands, where were the United States?
  reply report
59
tksenseiposted 14 years ago
http://newsburglar.com/2008/06/03/inter … ed-states/

"Private Capital Flows:
In 2006, the United States initiated $62.3 billion in private capital flows to the developing world. This amounted to one-third of all international private capital flows to developing countries.

Private capital flows are essentially investments and lending at market terms. As the Hudson Institute report puts it, “it is this capital that creates jobs, raises productivity, transfers skills and technology, and boosts export industries in developing countries—what economists see as the critical factors in creating growth and prosperity.”

American Private Giving:
But American international development aid doesn’t consist only of capitalism and governmental donations. Far from it.

Private and voluntary organizations (PVOs) in the United States gave approximately $10.6 billion to developing countries in 2006.

Religious Organizations in the United States gave approximately $8.8 Billion to developing countries in 2006.

Non-profit Foundations in the United States gave approximately $4.0 billion to developing countries in 2006.

Corporations in the United States gave approximately $5.5 Billion to developing countries in 2006.

Colleges, Universities and other foundations in the United States gave approximately $3.7 billion to students from developing countries in 2006.

In the 2006-2007 academic year, 60 percent of international students came from the developing world. Of this group, 61 percent came from Asia, 18 percent from Latin America, 10 percent from Africa, 5 percent from the Middle East, 5 percent from Europe, and less than 1 percent from Oceania

Volunteers in the United States gave approximately $2.2 billion worth of time in 2006 volunteering for development assistance causes abroad and for international assistance organizations in the U.S. It is estimated that 26.7 percent of Americans volunteered in some capacity in 2006. Among these 61.2 million volunteers, 8.1 billion volunteer hours were dedicated to domestic and international volunteerism."

"American private and voluntary organizations alone gave more aid to the developing world in 2006 than Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden each gave in government aid.

Universities and colleges in the U.S. provide more in scholarships and stipends to the developing world than half of all the developed country donors gave in official assistance individually in 2006

Remittance outflows from the United States to the developing world totaled $71.5 billion in 2006, or 37 percent of total U.S. economic engagement with developing countries. They exceed any other donor country’s government aid program and are equivalent to 68 percent of total ODA from all developed countries. "
reply report
67
Make Moneyposted 14 years ago
This proposed one world government may have an impact on those countries that have refused to ratify important United Nations resolutions like the banning of land mines or ratifying the International Criminal Court. The US has not ratified either. If they were made to then the US would not be allowed to manufacture, sell or use land mines. And they may be forced to hand over suspected war criminals to stand trial in the Hague (examples - Kissinger, Bush, Cheney and the like).
reply report
1. 59
  tksenseiposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  ...............
  reply report
2. 63
  Ralph Deedsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Works for me! I wonder why Obama hasn't bothered to join other civilized nations and sign the treaty banning cluster bombs.
  reply report
60
Valerie Fposted 14 years ago
I always wondered about people who feel a constant need to criticize the US for our military involvement in other countries.

If we don't get involved, we're criticized for ignoring the plight of the suffering people and looking out only for our own interests.

If we do get involved, we're criticized for interfering, bullying other nations, trying act like we're the world police.

In other words, whatever we do, we can't do anything right.
reply report
1. 67
  Make Moneyposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  Actually Valerie it has more to do with what previous US administrations have chosen to take part in and the ones they've avoided. There has seemed to be underlying reasons for the do's and don'ts.
  reply report
63
Ralph Deedsposted 14 years ago
These videos shed some light on the issue of U.S. military involvement in the affairs of other countries which reached a nadir with Bush's mindless preemptive war doctrine justifying the U.S. invasion of Iraq:

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_t … &uni=1
reply report
53
Lloyd Christmasposted 14 years ago
This has been coming for an awful long time but i am shocked with how fast it is now proceeding, its frightening and i really fear for my children.
reply report
1. 63
  Ralph Deedsposted 14 years agoin reply to this
  You're referring to global climate change I assume? Or terrorism? Or the proliferation of nuclear weapons? Or increasing piracy at sea? Or violations of copyrights, or failed governments and the lack of effective international institutions to deal with these issues? Or what?
  reply report
61
Bovine Currencyposted 14 years ago
Even more relevant, I know you like timelines, is the death of civilians in Iraq. In a month alone the death toll floats around 5000. Bush killed more Iraqis than Saddam.
reply report
60
garynewposted 14 years ago
The UN is one very unfunny joke, primarily on the American people. We are already too close to a one world government, so, no, I refuse to prepare for that awful day.
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

One World Gov't. Are you ready?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

One World Gov't. Are you ready?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies