Do you think we need a new national anthem?
There is a movement to replace our national anthem with a new one. A poll last week indicated that many Americans think that Bruce Springsteen would be the best choice to compose a new national anthem. Do we need a new one?
The first question that comes to my mind is "what is wrong with the one we have?" Maybe too many so-called Americans care little for our rememberance of the war that was fought and the bleed that was shed to free this country to its own independence from tyranny. Perhaps a new song praising the utopian benefits of socialism is in order. Obviously, the old one is flawed in that it does not mention same-sex marriage or the evils of speaking God's name in public. For all our education dollars spent, we have to this? WB
This is a great question but one which should not have to be asked. Our national anthem we presently have was first used by the Navy in 1889 but it was not officially recognized by Congress until March 1931. Regardless of the mood of individual segments or organizations it should not be changed.
Our national anthem honors those who have fought in the past to protect the freedoms we have and is also a recognition of the principles upon which this country was found. Changing the national anthem would be like changing the principles upon which this country is based. Movements to change the anthems simply for the reason some individuals think it should be revised is not reason enough to revise it.
Although I adore Bruce and his talent, I have to agree with Wayne. There is nothing wrong with the one we have - its beautiful and says it all.
The Star Spangled Banner has served pretty well for over 80 years. It is recognized by many people all over the world as symbolic of US values.
I don't feel we need to change.
What may be nice could be a new celebratory song, we haven't had one of those for several decades. Something extolling pride in the US, like America the Beautiful or My Country Tis of Thee.
A good rousing march would fit, is there a modern Sousa out there? Or a Cohan with "Over There"?
There's no need for a new national anthem. Our current one is about how this country came to be and I can't think of anything better.
No new Anthem. Our Star Spangled Banner is part of our history. Changing it will be rewriting part of that hstory. Coming up with other patritoic songs is always a good idea. The more of them we have the better.
We can sing those right along with our Anthem.
One reason I think some find it difficult to sing is that we do not sing it enough. It should be played often on the radio and terlevision. When I was a young girl, the television channels would sign off at about midnight. When it did, the National Anthem was played.
That is not a good time to play it though. It should be played maybe midday when the midday news was on and in the evening when the evening news is on. We need a resurgence in pride for our country. This could be one way to get the ball rolling.
I'm up in the air on this one. On one hand, our national anthem is a poem about the our defense of Fort McHenry against a British naval bombardment in 1814 that has been set to the tune of a British pub song. Almost no American has heard of Fort McHenry, the Battle of Baltimore, or even the War of 1812 for that matter. The song is meaningless to our nation at best and gets us into a spirit of war at worst. On the other hand, the national anthems of many other nations are equally as meaningless as they often describe battle scenes in gruesome detail. Better to leave well enough alone I suppose.
No, we do not need a new National Anthem. If more people showed their patriotism then they would sing the song with pride and a patriotic duty. When the National Anthem is being sung or played it is important to either salute or put your hand on your heart and stand up. Respect is earned, not given away and our country has most definitely earned our respect.
Gee, I wonder what I said so wrong to get a vote down? Is there someone out there that doesn't believe in our National Anthem and standing up when it is played? Do they remove their hat or just sit there? Just curious.
Pagesvoice - there are hubbers who vote by emotion as if HP q&a is a middle school slam book rather than a place for educational debate and discourse.
pagesvoice it looks like someone went through and voted all of us down. Don't take it personally. It may have even been someone that's not from the US so they may not realize how seriously we take our anthem.
There are people out there who will down vote any answer that sounds even mildly patriotic, as if to prove that patriots are idiots and their answers must be stupid.
To ThelmaC, Breathe2travel and KK Trainor...Thank you for the responses. I'm tired of people hiding behind anonymity when they vote things down without a reason. I thought if I called their action out they would be patriotic enough to say why?
Honestly no we do not need a new national anthem plain and simple. Congress is actually committing treason because now a days they no longer say it unless it is at a baseball, football, and possible basketball games. They don't even say the pledge of allegiance in schools anymore. On top of we can't say Marry Christmas now it has to be happy holidays it's not right. What we need to do is go back to the constitution and get familiar with it again and stop trying to change what has worked for over a hundred years.
Thanks to all of you for taking the time to answer this question and I hope we get responses from many more of you. Looks like most people agree with me that we need to keep our current national anthem!
Although I think our Star Spangled Banner is difficult to sing (I lip sync those high notes), I really believe in hanging on to those threads that have been been woven into our American fabric. I hope it doesn't change.
no i do not think so...that way the very nature of the national anthem will be lost. the need is the proper understanding of the present one.
Please ... Really .... Who better than the fantastically wealthy New World American Bruce Springsteen ... Can't we leave anything alone .... Is this just one more thing that has to be "Fundamentally Transformed" ...... Why don't we just change our current Anthem to "Imagine" by John Lennon Why don't we just surrender now. Tell the rest of the world .. we give up ... Come in and take whatever you want. Why not just leave the current anthem in place. It really means nothing to most Americans. We've let the Constitution alone and that's not even recognized by our own president. Let's just leave the current anthem in place so we can continue to live the illusion that everything's O.K. and we're not on the brink of irreversible self-destruction. Whew .....
I don't think we need a new one, I love it! I like the Canadian one too.
Our unofficial National Anthem is 'Flow of Scotland' written by the Corrie's and most Scottish people I know view this as our national anthem. Although I don't think we need one and sometimes it could be seen as a form of division when planet earth is a, whole, I do find a tear in my eye whenever I hear ' Flower of Scotland'.
Not only do we need to keep The Star Spangled Banner as our anthem, we need to hear it sung in its entirety more often. Below is a link with the second verse: http://www.godvine.com/Marine-Stuns-a-C … -1721.html
I think there are some forces within or above our government who like to stir the pot of discontent.
They are trying to dilute the Constitution and Bill of Rights. This is merely another way to make the loss of liberty more palatable. If he were alive today, I think Hitler would be envious how smooth the creep of tyranny has been.
The 9/11 lie is alive and well. The Bush conspiracy theory is held as fact and both Bush and Obama caution us not to stray into dangerous territory -- shining a light where it should not be shone. There are too many secrets that, if revealed, would destroy their hold on their prized cash cow, America.
No, we need to keep our current anthem. We need to realize how it has been and continues to be assaulted by the betrayal of presidential oaths of office. They no longer protect the Constitution, but treat it as just a "G**-damned piece of paper."
Five years ago, I moved from the United States. I still love my country. But the distance gave me a chance to overcome the addiction to the Corporate Party media kool-aid. Only a year ago did I finally wake up from the Bush lie about 9/11. That's when science kicked in and my logic and mathematics paid off. It's all about the balance of energy. The WTC buildings started with only so much PE (potential energy), but so much more KE was done. All 3 buildings fell as if the cold steel beams did not exist. And that's impossible without controlled demolition. And Al Qaeda did not have months of unfettered access, not when CIA was one of the tenants and security was run by 2 Bush family members.
The Rothschild tyranny we were fighting in 1812 is the same tyranny to which our country is now dying.
No. Keep Francis Scott Key's poem. Keep the memory of the dream alive.
by Shyron E Shenko 10 months ago
What do you think about the NBA/NFL players who kneel when our national Anthem is played?Is it to show their disdain for the lawmen of our country when they enforce our laws? Or their disrespect for our country?Are they teaching our children to disobey our country’s laws, teaching them there...
by Readmikenow 3 months ago
How do you feel about the new NFL ruling requiring players on the field to stand during the playing of the national anthem. This ruling was not brought about by any government influence. It occurred because of economic pressure placed on the NFL by the fans of the NFL. These are...
by Gordon Hamilton 6 years ago
I'm really sorry for what may be an incredibly stupid question to most of you but I hope you will read a little further to understand why I am asking before shooting me down in flames! Tonight, I had a rare night off and went with a group of friends to a pub quiz. Long story short, it was teams of...
by Leslie McCowen 8 years ago
Someone on my local blog put this up, and I swear, at first I thought it was satire...but it's not. This is what we are up against For Real. Sarah Palin, speaking at Goshen College, March 2,2010: This news report reminds me of a few years ago when some self-appointed liberal newspaper...
by pisean282311 7 years ago
why there is so much fascination in media and general people about queen , prince and such things...is it only in uk or other countries too?
by capncrunch 9 months ago
Are you ready for a new national anthem and new American flag?What will the new flag look like?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|