After a close election and the president has made his promises, shouldn't we all be supportive?
Why is it so essential that there is bi-partisan communication and cooperation in our congress in this crucial moment in American History?
Actually, this claim about bi-partisanship being a benefit to the country depends on how bi-partisanship is defined. Essentially, according to Obama bi-partisanship means disavowing one's fundamental principles while accepting the principles of the other party. For example the Reagan and Bush (41) administration gave into tax increases for spending cuts in the "FUTURE". Those cuts never occurred.
A second problem with this notion of bi-partisanship is that liberals want immediate tax increases without identifying one cut. In fact, what is offered by the left is a cut to the growth of government. That means instead of raising spending 10 percent Obama is suggesting that raising spending only 8 percent and this is defined as a CUT in spending. That definition is contrary to any sensible meaning of spending cuts.
Another area of "savings" liberals point to is "waste, fraud and abuse". Why has that particular savings not already occurred during the previous 4 years if it is such a significant savings? Should that not be a primary objective of government in the first place, and therefore it has no relevance in the current discussion.
The bottom line with bi-partisanship is that it is a red herring. The reality is that we do NOT have a revenue problem - we the government has a spending problem. Reduce spending first - then there is something on the table to discuss.
''president has made his promises, '' REALLY
http://chicagoconsultant.com/page2.php? … mp;post=29
http://jon-ewall.hubpages.com/hub/barak … gnpromises
http://jon-ewall.hubpages.com/hub/Presi … nionSpeech
We all can be the judge on his promises that have not been kept. The government needs to cut spending and not raise more taxes on anyone.
It depends on which of his promises you're referring to. There are some things Obama wants to do that I oppose, such as raising taxes.
Good question , Yes l! We should be yet will we? , I think not ! America is truely divided almost equally , and in that division there is blindness in the opening of minds, now that is of the left And the right ! Media and government are too much in cahoots to inform us neutrally ! Our real problem though ........? Congress! Senate!
To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Most bad government has grown out of too much government.
Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
We should not be supportive when we KNOW beyond any reasonable doubt, that the direction Obama is taking our Nation leads to higher debt, higher taxes, bigger government and less freedom.
Have you noticed that Businesses are laying people off in droves, cutting back employee hours to part time, or closing down their plants?
Since the day after Obama was re-elected this has been going on, and it is only going to pick up pace after 1 Jan 2013... why do you think all those businesses are doing that?
Maybe they are a bit smarter than the 'average' American voter (half of them anyway), and they know far better what the re-election of Obama meant for our Nation's economy, and its future, than those who voted for him.
You don't support a President who is only going to bring harm to your family and your country. You do what you can, to block him at any and every opportunity from accomplishing what he wants to do. Unfortunately, with Obamacare going forward, and the Bush tax cuts expiring, the damage is already done... even if he accomplishes nothing else, his re-election ensures those two things will now occur... and the middle class (those making between 45k and 110k) are about to be crushed under the new taxes, penalties, and higher costs.
Millions will lose their jobs (or be cut back to part time) between now and 2014.
And the man that is most responsible for this happening, does not deserve anyone's support.
by Quilligrapher5 years ago
From a CNN report GOP divide over Obama tax plan goes public, November 28, 2012:"A CNN/ORC International poll released Monday also showed that a solid majority of respondents -- two thirds -- supports the...
by bahersadek6 years ago
Fighting back against Republican calls for greater spending cuts, President Obama said Friday that the government doesn’t need to make major changes to get its budget back on track and called for that solution to...
by Susan Reid5 years ago
There are some stinging indictments of both Romney and Obama in this sort of backhanded endorsement from the British "The Economist."What are your favorite/least favorite (or in the Queen's English, I suppose...
by AnnCee6 years ago
Get real Mr. President. I'll hold my breath!
by lady_love1587 years ago
http://www.speaker.gov/Blog/?postid=223533And he's not alone! Anyone with a lick of common sense that's had to deal with their own real life budgets will tell you having more disposal cash is better than having greater...
by theirishobserver.6 years ago
President Barack Obama has laid out a $447 billion jobs package of tax cuts and government spending yesterday that will be critical to his re-election chances but he faces an uphill fight with Republicans.With his poll...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.