Why does the media give Ann Coulter and Robert Zimmerman Jr air time?
Why not? They give people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Chris Matthews and Lawrence O'Donnell air time every day. Not a functioning brain cell in the lot.
the media likes to air things that are controversial. The more controversial the better. It is entertaining and amusing most of the time. But when you have the radical right listening, they take their inept comments as gospel, so they can be dangerous in one sense, especially when they rile up those with no sense at all.
Those answers hit the spot, but as a former broadcaster familiar with FCC rules, I will add this. At one time there was such a thing as the Fairness Doctrine, or as we called it, the equal time provision. If you allowed a Democrat 30 minutes, the law said you had to allow a Republican 30 minutes. It wasn't just politicians, it was anything public. If you had a white preacher like Pat Robertson on, then you had to allow the black Jesse Jackson equal time (well, still politics, I guess). In the beginning, management was terrified that equal time would wreck the stations financially, After deregulation, these rules no longer applied, but the media tries to police itself (up to a point). They also found that equal time actually works in that these controversial figures do bring in the viewers, as in the other hubbers' answers. Then I think they lost all touch with reality and forgot anything about equal time. I believe that they are now going for the sensation.
Or you might look at it this way. They are still giving equal time. If they allow an intelligent person 30 minutes or an hour, they have to allow a stupid one equal time!
Because the media is in business and business requires customers. Without consumers of the this media, there would be no add revenue. They, as businesses, should be able to decide who they allow to appear on their shows. They also have the right to allow people like Jackson and Sharpton. This is freedom. While I disagree with Jackson and Sharpton on just about, if not everything, it is the right of a media outlet to decide what they air.
On what basis would you think that "someone" should stop a media outlet from airing a specific person's view? What specific issues do you have with these two citizens?
Why shouldn't they. Just because you disagree with Ann Coulter doesn't mean she should be silenced. Or maybe it does to some of the totalitarian thinkers out there. Clowns like Jesse Jackson have gone on national TV and made anti-semitic racially charged statements and he is still on television and considered a leader in the civil rights movement...or at least civil rights for some people...but not all.
It's amazing to hear people complain about Ann Coulter getting air time when liberal media outlets give non stop air time to their favorite pundits on a daily basis across every media outlet dominated by the left, and routinely make outlandish statements. Outside of talk radio...which for some reason liberals don't listen to long enough to keep a liberal thinker on the air and get any serious ratings, FOX news and once in a blue moon on CNN, there is barely a conservative voice expressed. I guess ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNC, NPR, CNN, and nearly every media outlet in print across the country is not enough ideological domination of the expression of ideas. The funny thing is that even though the political left in this country already dominates the media, they are the ones who have fought to bring back the fairness doctrine. Conservatives are more than happy to let the people decide what media outlets they choose to listen to. I guess why wouldn't they want to be able to regulate which conservative meets the standards of their definition of a conservative and worthy of air time. What's even more funny to me is how the media so often portrays a point of view as a general consensus when the ideological political divide in this country is split down the middle. Yet that is hardly represented in the journalistic community.
by Andrew Spacey 2 years ago
Same sex marriage - Equality or Not for gay people?Ireland recently voted 68% to 32% by referendum to allow same sex marriage, the first country in the world to do so. Is this true democracy at work? How do you view the decision - is it good for a whole country to be given the chance to vote on...
by Holle Abee 6 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBC_NewsThis is really hard to believe. A major news network would do something like this? Does anyone know if it's true that NBC did this?
by Lgali 9 years ago
I think both will be equal
by Wesman Todd Shaw 5 years ago
Al Sharpton didn't ever mention it, Jesse Jackson never brought it up, and you didn't look like one of Obama's daughters.The mass media couldn't sell your murder towards a globalist agenda, and Democrats didn't care because no one used a gun to kill you.I hate myself for using your image on the web...
by yankeeintexas 5 years ago
Now that George Zimmerman was found not-guilty do you fell that the state did not have a strong caseor has a great injustice been done?
by Borsia 5 years ago
Now that the jury has acquitted Zimmerman what message will resound?Will there be more reporting and comments on the basic theme that violence begets violence and that if you attack someone they can defend themselves no matter what your reasons might be.Or will it be that a racist prejudiced system...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|