This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (9 posts)

Is Ted Cruz good for the Republican Party?

  1. lions44 profile image98
    lions44posted 4 years ago

    Is Ted Cruz good for the Republican Party?

    As a Republican, I say no.  Whether you agree with him or not, the modern media filter makes him look extreme. There's nothing good to come out of his intransigence. Just as hard core left wingers make the Dems look bad, hard core right wingers turn the GOP into extremists in the eyes of the general public.  It's cliché, but moderation in everything is good.

    https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/8450530_f260.jpg

  2. profile image53
    tbHistorianposted 4 years ago

    Senator Cruz is a very articulate Republican who stands with the people. His renderings of the Affordable Care Act are much more accurate than those of the Democrats. The Act initiated a free-fall objective destined to increase insurance costs and provide expensive copays to most US citizens. This will create a detrimental reduction in economic capability for the nation as more is spent on healthcare and less on rebuilding the workforce of the nation.
    Senator Cruz recognizes this catastrophe and is attempting to eliminate the Act's burden of high cost from further degrading the middle-class that is already struggling under the enormous weight of unnecessary government involvement. 
    Senator Cruz understands that the federal governments default age curve for health insurance premiums is designed to impact baby-boomers more drastically than any other age group. This is due to a 1:1 rate for 21 years of age versus 3:1 for 64 and above. With the baby-boomer generation as the largest in the nations history, the federal government must require them to pay more due to their wealth holdings. As Senator Cruz stated, the President and those who voted to retain the Act are "wanting to see the American people suffer."
    In addition, if the Act were so good for the country, the President would not need to distribute exemptions to his favorites discriminately. With this discrimination, the President has dictated a "class society" that will detrimentally affect the hard working middle-class. This action by the President is recognized as treason when the outcome is a detrimental burden on the hard working American.
    Those in agreement with Senator Cruz, like myself, recognize that the Act does not make healthcare more affordable, provide better care, nor improve the already over-burdened healthcare professionals. Therefore, it does not actually result in any advancement of professional healthcare. What the Act does is create a higher burden on the current healthcare system by impeding the ability of the hospitals, doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals to attend to the patient that requires their support. This is quite evident as one reads the law and finds that it only applies to the insurance companies and their actuary tables.
    This monopoly generated by the law then represents a burden upon the individual because each must endure a single national "one-size fits all" program. So why is it not the same for the President & Congress? Why so many exemptions?

    1. lions44 profile image98
      lions44posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Your response is probably the best defense of Cruz I've heard in a long time, if ever.  You are right on many of your points. But my point is that the battle is over for now.  Why take the PR hit in a losing cause? Save it for other battles.

  3. The Frog Prince profile image80
    The Frog Princeposted 4 years ago

    If the Republican Party is to survive the answer is yes.  The RINOs need to go.

    1. lions44 profile image98
      lions44posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Thx FP for commenting. I could not disagree more with your sentiment. The GOP has been successful in the past as an inclusive party.  Absolutism just minimizes the party in an era of sound bites. We can convince people of our ideas in other ways.

  4. Georgie Lowery profile image93
    Georgie Loweryposted 4 years ago

    As an unaffiliated voter, I'd say no, he isn't good for the Republicans. Regardless of whatever his personal philosophies may be, he's come across as someone who is not going to compromise or work with others towards an end goal unless there is no other option. His recent actions, in my opinion, have not only damaged the credibility of the GOP, they've adversely affected the general population's ability to believe in politicians in general, which was already in sorry shape. Someone needs to remind him, as well as many of our other policy makers, that this is not a game.

  5. LandmarkWealth profile image80
    LandmarkWealthposted 4 years ago

    That depends on what you mean by the Republican party.  If you are a political insider like the Lindsey Grahams of the world...than no.  They are people, not unlike the Democrat establishment on the other side who are interested only in keeping the status quo.  Many people that claim to be advocates of the Conservative message forget that Reagan was a political outsider as well.  He was not just despised by the mainstream media and Democrats.  But the country club Republican establishment hated Reagan.  He challenged a sitting President in the primary.  He was extremely successful to a certain extent in that he changed the direction of the discussion away from Gov't being the solution to all of our problems.  But he did this in spite of the toughest opposition coming from the Republican establishment. He was also characterized as a hardcore radical.  Yet, he was so liked by the people, he was re-elected in one of the biggest landslide elections in modern politics, winning 49 out of 50 states.    I am not saying that Cruz is the next Reagan.  But like Reagan,he is demonized lately more from his own party, than from the opposition.  That's because he is actually trying to do what he said he was planning to do.  And most of the establishment is only interested in votes.

    When you look at the Tea party movement, there are many people from different walks of life with varying views on different topics.  But the one unifying belief among them is that gov't is too big and out of control.  Unfortunately, this is not really the belief of the Republican establishment.  They are simply using Conservatives as a means to achieve political power.  I don't know if Ted Cruz is a true Conservative yet.  Time will tell.  But to date he has shown that he is not so quick to just follow along with the party establishment.  And that is a good thing as far as I am concerned if you're a Conservative.  I am interested only in what is good for the Conservative movement.  I couldn't care less about what the political  elite think is good for them.

    1. lions44 profile image98
      lions44posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Another passionate response.  As much as I agree, conservative Repubs need to take a page from the Obama playbook. Wrap yourself up in "moderate" cloaks, and then get in power. That's the only way to create change.  Public purity tests look bad.

    2. LandmarkWealth profile image80
      LandmarkWealthposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I have thought that myself.  Do the opposite of what you say.  Run as a moderate and then do what makes sense.

 
working