Do you think stalling on unemployment extensions is hurting the economy?
Most people don't bank unemployment checks. They spend it. That's a lot of money for a million and a half people to not have to spend.
No - Just as I do not believe that unemployment checks help the economy, I do not believe that stalling on unemployment extensions is hurting the economy. Unemployment hurts the economy. Unemployment checks therefore hurt the economy.
Politicians love to speak about helping the unemployed. However, they do not assist the unemployed unless they work to create jobs. The battle is not unemployment pay, but the lack of jobs. The current failure to create jobs is totally based on failure in Administration. The bickering over unemployment pay is still just a band-aide solution to the real problem.
If the politicians want to assist in growth of the economy, then they need to rescind the political stranglehold they have placed upon the nation. Of course this means declaring all Presidential Executive Orders null and void. We know the politicians will never attempt this, because it would return the power to the people.
I think it depends a lot on who it is and how it's being spent. I don't' think there is a one size fits all answer here.
With that said, TB is right. The people are no longer in control, but aren't we kidding ourselves when we say "vote 'em out"? Haven't politics over the years shown that ultimately, politicians end up more concerned with politics than anything else?
And I'm sorry, spin it however you want but a capitalist economy is only going to worsen unemployment in this day and age. Technology has and will continue to take jobs away because it promotes profits to businesses. As business profits skyrocket, the rich then become more powerful than the politicians thus controlling who gets the funding to run for office and thus increase corruption. As lifespans increase, population grows and technology advances how do we suppose we're just going to conjure jobs out of thin air?
I'm not saying "go socialism" because I'm aware of the impact a curve creates but perhaps we will have to come up with some form of hybrid that can limit the power of the rich because don't kid yourselves...they are who truly run this and other countries.
I've had this thought before...limit a persons income to 5 times that of the normal "cost of life" and then force retirement. This still allows for people to achieve high levels of success beyond others but then instead of continuing to empower them with far more money than is needed to live and support ones family, they retire comfortably at a younger age and open up jobs to those beneath them creating a trickle effect right on down to the loading docks. Of course you have to close loopholes for hiding money but... Opinions?
It looks good on paper, but a free country can't limit a person's ability to grow; even when greed gets involved. People have the attitude of "cut spending, as long as it doesn't effect me." That's why they aren't voted out. Not willing to sacrifice.
by fishskinfreak2008 8 years ago
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100129/bs_ … sa_economyThe question as always is: can this level of growth be SUSTAINED?
by cliffordh 8 years ago
I was one of many individuals yesterday that, was disappointed in the Senateâ��s refusal to fund emergency unemployment benefits for millions of Americans across the country who, were in desperate need of it, using the catchall excuse their reluctance to add more to an already growing deficit...
by Holle Abee 7 years ago
Four Democrats and Lieberman voted with the Republicans. I have mixed feelings about this, according to the research I've done. It seems that "economy experts" are split on their views. Some argue that increasing taxes on the upper economic class will stifle jobs, while others say that...
by jiberish 8 years ago
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 01900.htmlIn this Washington Post article it says that two-thirds of the stimulus went toward tax cuts, fiscal aid to states, and expanded unemployment benefits and food stamps. The stimulus also went to the $3 billion in National Science Foundation...
by Jim Hunter 7 years ago
Thats ridiculous, if you can't find a job in your area in three years then move to where the jobs are. Unemployment is beginning to be a career for some people.
by My Esoteric 4 years ago
Unemployment hasn't been this low since 2008 while 113,000 more jobs were added during one of the worst winters America has seen. E\What do you think?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|