Are the indifferent and irresponsible actions of faith-healing believers exploit

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (15 posts)
  1. bethperry profile image88
    bethperryposted 8 years ago

    Are the indifferent and irresponsible actions of faith-healing believers exploited by lawmakers...

    as an excuse to intrude on general parental rights?

    Herbert and Catherine Schaible defied a court order to seek out medical treatment for their children and now face prison terms after allowing another child to die because they believe in "faith healing" and scorn medical help. While I find their actions contemptible, I sometimes fear the government may use such extremist actions as opportunity (excuse) to remove the rights of all parents to make educated decisions regarding their children's medical treatment. What do you think?

  2. raymondphilippe profile image93
    raymondphilippeposted 8 years ago

    Nobody has to qualify to become a parent. So it's only sensible to have a safeguard built in. Some parents are simply not fit to parent.

    1. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Great point.

  3. profile image0
    dragonflycolorposted 8 years ago

    When you have people who are intentionally negligible, then it stands to say that officials should step in.  The more often it happens, the more likely safeguards are to be put in.  It's just the way it's going to be if we continuously have parents who harm children.  It may not be fair, but it may be what is needed to protect them.  I don't approve of anyone telling me how to raise my children, but if it's the law, then we must follow it or change it for the better.  Either way, I agree with ray, some people should not have children.

    1. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this


  4. profile image0
    Sri Tposted 8 years ago

    Faith healing and alternative healing methods have a tremendously successful track record. Books by P.P. Quimby, Emil Coue, Charles Baudouin, Thomas Jay Hudson, Frederick Bailes have case histories. Spiritual teachers, gurus and countless New Thougtht teachers have constantly healed people for over 100 years or more without hospitals. Before recorded history, healers have always existed. If someone has the gift of healing and the esoteric knowledge, it can be done. Prayer alone has healed millions of people. Do these people have the knowledge or the gift? Apparently not. But that does not mean that the only way to heal people is to pay thousands of dollars or go to  hospitals. Hospitals let people die sometimes. Their case is unfortunate. Maybe they should have tried medicine. But healers have great success too. The AMA, doctors and hospitals are profit driven. And their cures don't always work either. In some cases, they want the money more than to cure people!

    1. raymondphilippe profile image93
      raymondphilippeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      "Prayer alone has healed millions of people"??

    2. profile image0
      Sri Tposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      You can check countless churches all around the world. Each person's life has cuts, injuries, all kinds of health problems. Do these people go to the hospital every day? No. Some use over the counter medicine. Some use "hope". Some use prayer.

    3. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I believe there are worthy alternatives to Western medicine that are being discounted today by profiteering corporations; but I don't see that just calling yourself a believer in faith healing qualifies as expert knowledge in any healing practice.

    4. profile image0
      Sri Tposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Have you ever been healed without medicine? I speak from experience.

    5. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Sri T, yes I have. As Western pharmaceutical treatment failed me big time, I turned to herbs. But I wouldn't subject my children to illness by simply praying. I feel our Creator expects us to take a proactive interest in health matters.

  5. luvtoowrite profile image39
    luvtoowriteposted 8 years ago

    This situation is not just about parent rights, but children and their right to be treated, especially if it is a serious illness. Children are not property, but under their parents care. In this case, the parents did not seek medical attention for their child, knowing she was not getting any better. This did not infringe on their rights, but the child's rights that died.

    1. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this


  6. junkseller profile image83
    junksellerposted 8 years ago

    I sometimes think that we should have to sign a contract in order to have kids saying things like we will care for them as best we can, play with them five times a week (at least), make them eat their peas, and seek out modern medical care (or at least approved alternative medical care), etc. That way if people say they can't sign because they believe that their god Fluffybutt will heal their children, they can be prevented from ever having kids in the first place.

    The problem is that we would end up in the same place we are already in: society as a whole deciding what is acceptable and then imposing that view onto everyone.

    But at the end of the day, that is what a society is. You can't really avoid it. Some societies are more accepting of alternative beliefs. Others are rigid. All we can really do is try and create a system which attempts to balance individual rights with collective acceptability. We do that through our system of democracy which includes a system of checks and balances and a judicial system where we are tried by our peers.

    In this case, the couple had already lost a child under similar circumstances a few years ago. The state by itself didn't step in and force anything on to them. It put them through the judicial system and had them tried by their peers (who found them guilty). They came out of that manslaughter verdict with probation and a future requirement to seek appropriate care for their other children.

    I agree with the caution against state intrusion, but I would argue that the intrusiveness of the state was quite mild in this instance. Now that a second child has died, it seems reasonable to be more aggressive. The vast majority of society believes that if these parents had acted appropriately, those children would be alive. If this was some other form of negligence, say leaving a child in a car in summer,I don't think anyone would be arguing against state intrusion. Faith isn't (or shouldn't be) special permission to be negligent.

    As for faith healing, well I think it is idiotic. Believing in prayer is one thing. Eschewing a specific set of tools and knowledge for no logical reason is just willful stupidity.

    1. bethperry profile image88
      bethperryposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      junkseller - fantastic perspective, thank you!


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)