Do YOU agree with Rudolph Giuliani's assessment that President Obama is anti-Ame

1. 85

   gmwilliamsposted 9 years ago

   Do YOU agree with Rudolph Giuliani's assessment that President Obama is anti-American and his
   
   INTENT is to worsen American through his sociopolitical policies to the extent that America as it is presently will either be destroyed or near destruction?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 72

   pagesvoiceposted 9 years ago

   A noun + a verb + 9/11 = the sum total of Giuliani's contribution to America. He is the male version of Sarah Palin struggling to make himself feel relevant, when in reality he is insignificant and not even newsworthy.

   replyreport
3. 85

   M. T. Dremerposted 9 years ago

   It's lowbrow rhetoric to paint the president as an anti-American villain. Giuliani, and others like him, have been spewing this verbal diarrhea since the day Obama was elected.

   replyreport
   1. 76

      lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Welp--now we know the quality of discourse they want.SO BE IT.

      replyreport
4. 76

   lovemychrisposted 9 years ago

   I think Guiliani was a collaberator in 9-11, and his ilk are the real America-Traiter-Haters.

   replyreport
   1. 84

      Austinstarposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      You seem to really be into conspiracy theories! Wow.

      replyreport
   2. 76

      lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      No,I don't believe Obama and Hilary killed Stevens,and I do believe he was born here.I don't think he's gay,or Michelle's a tranny,I don't believe he did coke, had gay sex,and married men to kill them later. I don't believe he secret Muslim terrorist

      replyreport
5. 80

   dashingscorpioposted 9 years ago

   This comes from a man who moved his mistress in the Mayoral house?
   Unless he means to say the Democrat's agenda is "anti-American" he shouldn't be singling out Obama. It's not as if he is pushing for things (his party) doesn't approve of.
   Whether one supported a potential presidential candidate or not throughout the election process most of them reveal what they're in favor of. Hypothetically if your candidate didn't win it means the majority of the country sided with the other candidate.
   I really don't know how anyone who is pushing for higher minimum wages, health insurance, education, immigration reform, protection for borrowers from deceptive lending practices is suddenly deemed as being Anti-American stances.
   The real insinuation is to suggest Obama is NOT an American and therefore he doesn't support the American way of life.
   His very existence is enough to anger some folks. Everything Obama does and or says comes into question from his place of birth to his desire to end the Iraq war which he voted against in the first place. There was no WMDs or ISIL in Iraq before then.
   Just because people have a difference of opinion does not make one of them love America more than the other. Rudolph Giuliani is a "has been political hack" that no one would even know was still alive if it weren't for his occasional outrageous attacks against a sitting president. He's still angry he didn't win the Republican nomination and he knows he never will.
   Can you imagine if 9/11 happened during the first term of Obama's watch? It's highly unlikely he wouldn't have been (blamed) nor would he have gotten re-elected like George W. did.
   If it rains it's Obama's fault!
   Are things "wonderful"?  Hell No!
   Are things better than they were in January 2009? Absolutely!
   It will be interesting to see which path the country votes for 2016.

   replyreport
   1. 76

      lovemychrisposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      It's a Superiority Compex. Because,if you criticized Bush, you were called un-American. And now--they call the prez un-American!! It's just incredible..the HUBRIS! They need to get help, because it's a mental illness. Superiority Compex: google

      replyreport