Do you approve the use of a robot to kill a criminal human?

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (14 posts)
  1. ptosis profile image83
    ptosisposted 2 years ago

    Do you approve the use of a robot to kill a criminal human?

    Dallas cop sniper killed 5 cops & after a 5 hour standoff, police made unprecedented decision to use a police robot & purposeful kill suspect with robot bomb.

    Ryan Calo, a professor at the University of Washington School of Law who studies robotics and cyberlaw. "As far as I know, this is a first time that they've used a robot to intentionally kill someone."

    Cops say there was no other option but couldn't they have used a  robot to deliver a flash or smoke grenade to incapacitate a suspect?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13094769_f260.jpg

  2. Ericdierker profile image51
    Ericdierkerposted 2 years ago

    Ptosis I ventured onto the same basic question. Why not use non-lethal force to incapacitate the suspect? The arguments for not using other options are wiped away when we understand that we could have tried and failed and tried again.
    And then there is the other question. Why not just toss an explosive in? Why the need for a robot if all you are doing is blowing up a place? The robot seems very Hollywoodish.
    I will be interested to learn what experts and the police have to say about it. I wonder what protocols were in place and why this option was chosen.
    I surely do hope that the harsh reality that this man was suspected of killing others, particularly men in blue was not a factor in the decision to just kill him rather than subdue and arrest him.

    1. ptosis profile image83
      ptosisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      On May 13, 1985, Philadelphia police dropped two pounds of military explosives onto a city row house occupied by the group MOVE. The resulting fire was not fought for over an hour although firefighters were on the scene.

  3. tamarawilhite profile image92
    tamarawilhiteposted 2 years ago

    The criminals had already murdered several people, risking more good people to kill the murderer would be wrong if it isn't necessary - especially since their method meant no innocent people were killed.
    In contrast, a drone strike that kills the target and untold innocents isn't as clearly acceptable.

    1. Ericdierker profile image51
      Ericdierkerposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Aren't you kind of leaping over the judge and jury concept. And isn't that exactly what the protesters were peaceably protesting? If cops get to, after premeditation, make a conscious decision who is guilty and then kill them not in self defense?

    2. ptosis profile image83
      ptosisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      unwarranted police's use of deadly force under circumstances where neither the life of the police officer, nor that of any other person was immediately endangered, perpetuate the schism between police & people.

    3. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
      bradmasterOCcalposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      What is your point??

  4. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
    bradmasterOCcalposted 2 years ago

    The shooter said that he had a bomb. Maybe a less lethal flash grenade might have worked, but what about the bomb then.
    Why do we worry so much about killers versus their victims.
    We don't know the details that were involved and what choices were available?
    Did you care that Navy Seals executed OBL?

    1. ptosis profile image83
      ptosisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Exactly, If there were bombs then shouldn't he be kept alive to tell the locations? Paramilitary police units foster mentalities that place their conduct above and outside the law. Summary execution by the police strips away the trust of the people.

    2. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
      bradmasterOCcalposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Would it have made a difference if was taken out by a police sniper?
      Why didn't Obama want to take OBL alive to answer the question about 911?

    3. ptosis profile image83
      ptosisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Brad, wtf has this got to do with OBL. Focus on the Q please.

    4. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
      bradmasterOCcalposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      It has to do with the ? of gov taking life, whether it is in Dallas, or at the federal level. The same factors must be used. Y the shooter may have told where bombs were located, and OBL could have told us things we need to know about terrorism. F?

  5. ptosis profile image83
    ptosisposted 2 years ago

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13098055_f260.jpg

    Not much has changed since the 1979 NCJRS report:

    There is no greater issue that serves to precipitate a breakdown into civil war than the police use of deadly and excessive force. Unwarranted use of deadly force serves to perpetuate the schism between police and community; it  generates fear, hostility, a  climate of suspicion, indifference, and noncooperation.

    Police lawlessness is widespread and stimulates the development of disrespect for legal institutions. This disrespect has too often been earned by the conduct of law enforcement agencies. Summary executions by paramilitary police units foster mentalities that place their conduct above and outside the law. Police departments should be purged of officers who misuse their discretionary authority to cloak the racism, psychopathology, and brutality which inculpates  many officers.

    The police must be liable for criminal prosecution as a result of their acts, like any ordinary citizen. The present mitigating circumstances rules used to exculpate police officers from responsibility such as prosecutors who refuse to prosecute might be the beginnings of a  totalitarian system. Nothing differentiates more from the democratic policeman & his totalitarian colleague as attitude towards use of force. In a  totalitarian regime, force is frequently unbridled & often glorified.

    Real security within the society will only come when citizens voluntarily accept and support the law. Reliance upon the threat of violence will not provide security and stability with the indiscriminate use of deadly force. The threat of force will not lessen the conflict, it will only intensify it.

    The killing of a citizen by police under questionable circumstances, increases the danger to the police.  Loss of trust and a withdrawal of cooperation provides a potentially violent vacuum in which angry and frustrated citizens can target the police for all of their grievances simply because the police are the most visible and symbolic representatives of the government.

  6. ptosis profile image83
    ptosisposted 2 years ago

    Where did the Dallas police department get the bomb from? If it was done in such an imminent threat, isn't only the POTUS by Executive Order have the only legal authority? read more

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)