jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (14 posts)

Hillary CAUGHT wearing an earpiece last night - Who is Behind the Scenes Telling

  1. RJ Schwartz profile image94
    RJ Schwartzposted 19 months ago

    Hillary CAUGHT wearing an earpiece last night - Who is Behind the Scenes Telling Her What to Say?

    Hillary Clinton was exposed yet again yesterday for being unethical and untrustworthy.  Someone is coaching her behind the scenes, proving she isn't the most knowledgeable person on the stage, despite her many claims.  Some might call this CHEATING, but then again, that's just business as usual for a Clinton.  #HillarysEarPiece                                                                   The way she acted at the Veterans Forum shows she was LISTENING and REPEATING....not thinking

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13185431_f260.jpg

  2. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
    bradmasterOCcalposted 19 months ago

    Ralph
    I don't watch Hillary at all, but it is interesting.

    The reason is that I have made my choice without it, and without polls, and the news. As for politicians running for office, I look at what they did and not what they are saying now.

    If people need any further evidence that Hillary has failed in two offices by watching her now, then they are not making a wise choice. So, whether someone is coaching her now or not, it doesn't change her failures.

    Politicians promise so as to get elected, and then when they are incumbents they make new promises to the voters. The voters for the most party disregard their failure on their original promises, and believe they will actually make good on their new promises.

    They wouldn't do that with say their boss and their company. If their boss promised them a raise if they met quota, and didn't do it. Do you really think they would believe that boss, when they say meet the new project quota and you will get a raise. So it is strange that they believe politicians.

    Promises are not deeds, yet voters can't seem to tell the difference.
    Delete this if I didn't answer your question.

    1. RJ Schwartz profile image94
      RJ Schwartzposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Brad - You always bring something valuable to every forum you choose to answer in.

  3. MizBejabbers profile image91
    MizBejabbersposted 19 months ago

    I can see someone in the background saying, "10 seconds to go, Hillary, then 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 cut." Really informative, right!

    Did you not know that people who are on TV must receive directions from the director who is directing the show? When to talk, how much time is left, when to cut? Earpieces are worn for this purpose.This is the 21st century. You don't just wait for hand signals like we did back in the 1970s. Some are undetectable because they are wireless and are hidden inside the ear. Once again Republicans are letting their suspicious minds show their ignorance of how the world works.

    1. lovemychris profile image66
      lovemychrisposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      deliberate malfeasance to ruin soneone is more like it in my opinion. anything she does is subject to double standards, because shes a woman in a mans arena. powell told clinton to use use private lines back in 09. he was never accused of crime

    2. Shyron E Shenko profile image83
      Shyron E Shenkoposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Leslie and MizB, bless you both for telling it like it is.

    3. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
      bradmasterOCcalposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      mizbejabbers
      Then why didn't she have it in the primaries, and who else do you see with it. It may be the 21st century but people haven't changed.

    4. WiccanSage profile image96
      WiccanSageposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      It doesn't depend on the candidate, it depends on the place in which she's appearing/speaking. It's also quite possible she could have had it on dozens of times and no one ever made a big deal about it with a zoom-in picture.

    5. RJ Schwartz profile image94
      RJ Schwartzposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      There is evidence in the emails that she's been using it since 2009

    6. WiccanSage profile image96
      WiccanSageposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      lol so what? I'm not even voting for her but this is just a ridiculous distraction from the issues. They're all very well rehearsed, using prepared speeches, statements, prompters & electronics. A communication device is a non-issue.

    7. MizBejabbers profile image91
      MizBejabbersposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Brad, how do you know she didn't? I sometimes wear hearing aids, but nobody has ever seen them in my ears. When I told my best friend that I sometimes wore them, she was shocked.

    8. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
      bradmasterOCcalposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Your are right, I don't know, but it is questionable.
      Unlike the email issue, this one is not important.
      Thanks

    9. My Esoteric profile image91
      My Esotericposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Singers must be bad people to since most wear ear pieces when they perform.  It is interesting to see where and how stupid conspiracies are born.

    10. RJ Schwartz profile image94
      RJ Schwartzposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Sorry but a singer or actor isn't being asked random questions that need answered

 
working