The FBI "clears" Hillary in a week of finding 650K emails - is the fix FINALLY i

1. 84

   RJ Schwartzposted 8 years ago

   The FBI "clears" Hillary in a week of finding 650K emails - is the fix FINALLY in?
   
   FBI director James Comey tells Congress review of additional Clinton emails does not change conclusion she should not face charges.  Somehow the FBI could go through 650,000 emails in a week when they couldn't cover the 33,000 in a year of investigation?  America lost today - let's see if Assange has anything to say
   
   

   replyreport
2. 59

   Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years ago

   
   
   Well then I guess Comey has no problem with releasing the 650,000 emails or whatever to the press, right?
   
   That's what Hillary demanded, right?
   
   Don't hold your breath. This email has been going on for how many years? And two days before the election we're told this? No details, no remarks on what all those emails were about or whether any were or weren't from the 33,000 she deleted?
   
   You know if there were and they were all personal you know they'd be announcing that now wouldn't they. If they weren't all personal of course they wouldn't comment about it, now would they.
   
   There will be some tell all books written about this scandal.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Hey Paula, you out there? What's your friend at the FBI sayin now?

      replyreport
   2. 0

      savvydatingposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Good question. I feel rather let down myself, Paula. Any comment?
      
      Well then, Taze. Comey caves again!!
      
      He might be between a rock and a hard place, but he's still spineless. What a jerk.

      replyreport
   3. 60

      fpherj48posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      DTMB...Yes, I'm out here & UR not. I could tell U but then I'd have 2 kill U.
      
      Yves..."let down" is a mild way of putting it. Yes, ditto: spineless jerk.  sigh.............

      replyreport
   4. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      "Clinton Foundation investigation...no finale in sight?" Yes there is,if she is elected today that will be the finale, Obama will fire Comey and put a hack in charge of the FBI until Hillary takes office and all investigations will end.

      replyreport
   5. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      That is the Clinton Way...make it "go away" - even if that means one or several funerals for unexplained suicides - "that poor man...shot himself 4 times in the back of the head...."

      replyreport
3. 52

   Alyssa NYposted 8 years ago

   This was nothing but a pre planned carefully orchestrated set up. One of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen. Hillary Clinton has been noticeably quiet since this whole thing happened. She was in on it. FBI shld have jailed the whale.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      That would only work if the FBI had already reviewed the emails a week ago when Comey announced they had them & had not looked at them.That way he could control the outcome & be assured of today's announcement.So maybe he lied from start

      replyreport
   2. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      This "puts the issue to bed" once and for all, right?  Comey TWICE exonerates her from any wrongdoing - any future argument makes Republicans look like witch-hunters...unless Trump reveals the facts once he's elected.

      replyreport
   3. 81

      FitnezzJimposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Third time is the charm?

      replyreport
4. 83

   tamarawilhiteposted 8 years ago

   In terms of total corruption of the Obama / Clinton administration, yes.
   So is their attempt to engineer an event to make Trump look bad. A Democrat operative tried to rush Trump at his Reno, Nevada event. Someone yells "he has a gun", so the crowd scatters while Trump is taken away by secret service. A CNN reporter is already outside of the press area as the assailant is "rushing", which means he had foreknowledge. Crowd sees that CNN guy already had camera out and was positioning to film before anyone else, blocks his view.
   The assailant is taken away from what was supposed to be a "Trump supporters beat up innocent critic" but turned into "OMG, is this a Trump assassination attempt?"
   How do we know that the assailant is a Democrat operative like the instigators identified in Wikileaks and admitted to in Project Veritas?
   "Austyn Crites", the name of the attacker, shows up 6 times in #Wikileaks documents as such.

   replyreport
   1. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      The banana republic formerly known as America will no longer be using laws to guide them - its all social media, Orwellian news reports, and parasitic partisanship.  The words, truth, facts, illegal alien, and wall will be summarily removed.

      replyreport
   2. 52

      Alyssa NYposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Get ready for 4 (most likely 8) years of continued political corruption, lies, deceit, high taxes, globalism and really bad pant suits.

      replyreport
   3. 91

      MizBejabbersposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      What a spin, Tamara. That was a disgruntled Republican, not a Democrat.

      replyreport
   4. 61

      Ivan Todposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      As per the Urban Dictionary:
      "Austyn"= #carasmatic #unique #fantastic#whore
      "Crites"=A traitor to their own college. #traitor #bandwagon
      "Austyn Crites" is a cover name given to government agitators. Who he really agitated for is anybodys guess.

      replyreport
   5. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      sorry MizB - democrats have cornered the market on election violence dating back to Tammany Hall.  Republicans speak with their wallets while Liberals think their fists will enact positive change.

      replyreport
   6. 91

      MizBejabbersposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Ralph, maybe that's because Republicans have cornered the market on money, leaving the rest of us to scramble for a living. Then they criticize people like the Clintons who are nouveau riche.

      replyreport
5. 81

   gregasposted 8 years ago

   Comey is just doing what his bosses tells him to do. It just goes to show you that this election is fixed in more ways than one.

   replyreport
6. 66

   PhoenixVposted 8 years ago

   650K emails in a week. Nothing to see here. Move along.

   replyreport
   1. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I expect all Federal Investigations to now be done at this same speed - no more 1 or 2 year waits - time's a wasting.....

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Old Poolmanposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Simple math would tell us that if each person could read 1000 of these in one week, it would have taken 650 people to review every one of these emails.  I seriously doubt that many people were dedicated to this task.  Just another scam by the Feds.

      replyreport
   3. 66

      PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      It probably has something to do with A. Weiner. When it comes to perverts or perversion D.C. likes to protect its own.

      replyreport
   4. 0

      Old Poolmanposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      PhoenixV - They all have so much dirt on each other they have to protect each other regardless of the level of deprivation involved.  Even the perverts will be protected from prosecution.

      replyreport
   5. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      you're right Mike - that's why EVERYONE in DC has been against Trump - draining the swamp impacts both parties and would send a legendary ripple through mainstream America

      replyreport
   6. 81

      gregasposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I just hope he opened peoples eyes and may have at least started something that someone else can continue if there is anyone with guts and he doesn't have the opportunity.

      replyreport
7. 58

   The Old Guardposted 8 years ago

   
   
   Pretty amazing that it took less than a minute per email to arrive at the conclusion.
   Her maid handles classified info, a sex pervert handles classified info, and our illustrious leader at the FBI sees no problems with that.
   Me thinks the rule of law has died in America.
   The question now is who does the law apply to? Which government employees can break the laws, which banks can break the laws, which military contractor can break the laws.
   Once a standard for the world to see - a fair and just system of law has now turned into a government club to use against those that stand against it's tyranny.

   replyreport
8. 91

   MizBejabbersposted 8 years ago

   Oh, are we calling in Assange as a consultant now? May as well, since Assange and Snowden are being hailed as heroes by Obama haters.

   replyreport
   1. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      He's likely to be ousted - the Swiss are 'seeing' him soon

      replyreport
   2. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Bejabbers, listen to this and then tell us how wonderful your Hillary is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcUaoh4JOKQ
      
      Careful, what you say about her, remember she is a woman and Hillary is for women.

      replyreport
   3. 91

      MizBejabbersposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Since you are so handy with videos, DTMB, do you really want this woman as first lady? Oh, yeah, I guess you men do.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FXNF5Z7AIU

      replyreport
   4. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Why do we spend so many useless hours discussing First Ladies?  Unless we start electing them, their presence is merely as window dressing or in Michelle Obama's case, to lavishly spend taxpayers money

      replyreport
   5. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Because bejabbers can't find anything of substance to defend anymore.

      replyreport
9. 81

   FitnezzJimposted 8 years ago

   Could it be that it is easier to impeach than it is to prosecute?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Could be with a Republican congress, trouble is how many of them are really Republicans, I think most are career political establishment elites who will side with Hillary (probably because she has dirt on them)

      replyreport
   2. 84

      RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Impeachment proceedings would be about something a sitting President did, not what they did in the past I think (but I could be wrong)

      replyreport
   3. 81

      FitnezzJimposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Article II Section 4: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
      
      Nothing about 'in office'

      replyreport
10. 60

    fpherj48posted 8 years ago

    Relax, breathe, be patient and wait.  They hurried to clear her once again on the emails.  However, the "Clinton Foundation" investigation is ongoing & explosive thus far, with no finale in sight.  No need to bother with her recklessness with our security, when they can wrap her up with something much bigger, more corrupt and no way out.
    It's no longer in Comey's hands.

    replyreport
    1. 59

       Dont Taze Me Broposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       You will like this, send it to those liberals that surround you.
       
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcUaoh4JOKQ

       replyreport
    2. 84

       RJ Schwartzposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Ironic - we've never had a potential president subjected to so many legal issues for serious crimes.  Wondering who is being groomed as the "fall guy/girl" at the Foundation?  The NYPD also has been quite silent on the matter.

       replyreport