Should leakers of govt info, regardless of classification, be charged with treason?
Whether it be a transcript of a phone call, a picture, or a serious intelligence leak; the very fact that sensitive information is being circulated to the press and the world has implications for America. Playing politics is getting dangerous for the nations security. Or do you think 100% transparency should be the plan?
Ralph, this is a very complicated subject your asking about. There is no easy black/white answer.
It is obvious we have some persons or agencies who leak information that would politically aid them in some way. Is this treason? I'm guessing it could be depending on the information that is leaked. Secure information in the wrong hands could cause unnecessary death to those who are paid to defend us. In this case, it would for sure be treason.
The best way to find the source of a leak is to provide different versions of a false story to those suspected of leaking information. The version of the story that is leaked pretty well identifies the leaking person or agency.
Very complicated to say the least.
If a person leaks information that might lead to putting our troops, our diplomats in other countries, or our foreign operatives in danger, yes, I think that's treason.
If a person leaks something the government is doing that's wrong or illegal, that person should be treated as a whistle blower, and protected, rather than charged.
Who decides whether the govt is doing something wrong. Can you name any recent examples?
Sorry, I didn't realize I'd be required to draft legislation if I answered the question...
I agree with Lisa that there should be a distinction between whistle-blowing and national security. It does present a problem because sometimes there is a gray area between harm to the many and harm to the few.
I also have to agree with Lisa. Bad things do happen in government that need to be exposed. A whistle-blower should not be punished if what he/she divulges proves to be true..
Didn't realize this was gospel. "If a person leaks something the government is doing that's wrong or illegal, that person should be treated as a whistle blower, and protected, rather than charged."
Not gospel. Just my answer, which you clearly want to argue with. Why not just post your own answer to the question instead, so we get many viewpoints, without picking at each other?
Your answer is an opinion with no specifcs.It is vague and ambiguous and all I asked was clarification. Without that clarification how can your viewpoint be distinguished from your bias.
There are all kinds of different leaks?
Yes, it's my opinion. That's what the question asked for. If you have a different opinion, write your own answer.
by Reality Bytes 4 years ago
Tractor-trailer drivers will intentionally clog the inner loop of the Washington, D.C., beltway beginning on the morning of Oct. 11, according to a coordinator of the upcoming "Truckers Ride for the Constitution" rally.Organizers of the three-day ride want to call attention to a litany of...
by JAKE Earthshine 60 minutes ago
We all watched in utter astonishment and disgust when during the presidential campaign Mr. Trump betrayed the USA again when he maniacally and brazenly used our national airwaves to call on Russia, our arch enemy to break into our sovereign private property with the intent to steal said property...
by Randy Godwin 13 months ago
Should Trump be charged for giving classified info to the Russians?When Trump met with the Russians a day after firing Comey as the FBI director he is alleged to have revealed classified info to the Russian obtained from an ally country. This info is said to have put many undercover agents in peril...
by Dr Billy Kidd 5 years ago
The Senator from Nevada, Reid, says a Bain Capital employee told him Mitt Romney did not pay taxes for 10 years. If this proves to be true, does this change anything? Won't some people simply regard Romney as more of a hero, wishing they could do the same thing.
by ahorseback 35 hours ago
Obama must have been politically tired ? He did nothing about Russian interference in our elections , He must have been protecting Hillary and her closet server , her Uranium , her DNC corruption ,knowing the polls were showing her winning ,did he think she'd cover it up in...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|