Now that actual evidence of collusion has surfaced, do you think the GOP party s

1. 82

   ptosisposted 12 months ago

   Now that actual evidence of collusion has surfaced, do you think the GOP party should be punished?
   
   GOP operative received valuable Democratic voter-turnout analyses from  the hacker “Guccifer 2.0”, (a fabricated persona — created by Russian intelligence services.) - Aaron Nevins  received 2.5 gigabytes of stolen documents.  How would we insure that these political dirty tricks do not occur again in the future?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 79

   Hxprofposted 12 months ago

   That's evidence that a hacker provided the GOP with Democratic voter turnout analysis - not evidence of collusion.  Besides, the GOP had it's own analysis of Democratic voter turnout; this information isn't too hard to generate.  At best, it saved the GOP time and money.  We're still waiting for the imaginary evidence of collusion.

   replyreport
   1. 33

      bradmasterOCcalposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Hxprof
      
      Good one. After the game tactics of the left, it is incredible they can make these statements about how Trump played dirty. Even more so when unlike the DNC there is no evidence, just a fabrication by the losers.

      replyreport
   2. 63

      lovemychrisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      deep state are hardly losers. theyre bringing your fatboy down.

      replyreport
   3. 52

      Ericdierkerposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Yes dear I think I get your hate. But how can you not also hate what the DNC did to Bernie? That seems to be a horrible collusion. My elder son and daughter love the guy. Did they nail him because he was Jewish?

      replyreport
   4. 63

      lovemychrisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      nope. your slander attempt failed. there is no steve bannon or gorka nazi in dem big house. sanders should have stayed indie, instead of using dems. trump only got away with it because of his,russian/mafia pals: look it up. bye bye donnie

      replyreport
   5. 52

      Ericdierkerposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      I think I am finally getting your take Love. Dems are victims. I do not vote for victims, I vote for winners. My Rep who is Dem is a winner. Susan Davis does not now or ever whine. Nope, come next election dems will mock folk like Love My!

      replyreport
   6. 63

      lovemychrisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      hahaha! trump is a loser, and he whines constantly. *fail*

      replyreport
   7. 52

      Ericdierkerposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Yes Dear or whatever. You just throw insults and add nothing to thought. - I reckon that is what your ilk is about. Some of us would like to criticize the president - without being attacked. And some would like to support a concept. Without you Attac

      replyreport
   8. 33

      bradmasterOCcalposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Can anyone define the legal meaning of Evidence, and then apply it to this question? I don't see any understanding that these comments show EVIDENCE!

      replyreport
3. 33

   bradmasterOCcalposted 12 months ago

   
   
   ptosis
   Why did the left bother to whine and whine for a special prosecutor, and still wants to bypass the that prosecutor? Where is the sine qua non of Trump, Russia and the Trump victory? How can Hillary and the left claim she is the president, not Trump, because she won the popular vote by 3 million votes?
   
   The Wiki Leaks, the alleged DNC hacking, nor anything else affected the voters. The voters that supported Hillary never changed their vote, and they would still vote for her today.
   
   She will never be president, no matter what happens, because the US is an adult country, and we don't do do overs.
   
   The only voters that might have changed their vote were the Bernie Sanders supporters, who got screwed by the DNC. They voted independent and it is reflected in the voting tally. They did very well, but they never have a chance as independents to do anything but spoil the election. Like Ross Perot did.
   
   Trump worked the swing states, while Hillary did little campaigning since "winning" the primary. She had no message, or goal except to hate Trump. That is also what the left did, and still do. Although, the left should have had a platform for the people and the country, but they didn't. And they still don't have one today.
   
   In your hearts and minds, you have to know that Hillary Clinton was not any more of a president, than she was a sec of state.
   
   Both parties in the last three decades have been responsible for the decline of the US, and the 2008 bottom for the economy which we didn't recover from during the Obama years.
   
   Trump is was not a politician when he ran for president and defeated 17 of the best politicians that the Republicans had to offer. The Russians didn't help him win the primary, and if he didn't win the primary, game over.
   
   Even after winning the primary, some rinos kept attacking him, and they might as well switched to the democrat choir. They whine like them, so they should stand with them.
   
   Trump didn't have anything to do with the choices made by Hillary, the DNC and Obama. Hillary chose to avoid the FOIA by having her own private email server, knowing that all of her state dept info would go through it. Trump didn't have anything to do with the DNC successfully conspire to take Sanders out of the primary.
   
   There is no nexus to Trump or Russia being able to change the voter results in 2016. Consider also that the Obama investigation of Trump started even before he won the primary. Clearly to do a Sanders on him.
   EVIDENCE, NEXUS, ??

   replyreport
   1. 82

      ptosisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      nobody is saying that HRC is Prez except you. But you did hit on a very good point. The DNC withheld DNC voter email address from Bernie which is collusion  - just 1 of many ways Bernie  was screwed. Both parties should be held to higher  standards.

      replyreport
   2. 33

      bradmasterOCcalposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      ptosis
      I am only restating what I hear from the left. Including HRC, She said she was winning a week b4 the election, and it was Comey and Russians that changed it. The whole protest, rioting, name calling since the election is to impeach Trump

      replyreport
   3. 63

      lovemychrisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      sanders hacked her voting list at the very beginning! also was warned by the fec for his shady campaign contributions.you want to get real? lets. i think he also was paid by putin. and stein. he and moore call it their revolution. no, its womens.

      replyreport
   4. 79

      Hxprofposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Wow - this conspiracy stuff has gone quite some distance.  Sanders and Stein were paid by Putin...what a trip.  Why won't you admit that HRC was an awful candidtate??

      replyreport
   5. 63

      lovemychrisposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      umm,stein was at the celebration for rt with flynn and vlad.she was twitter-bombing days before election w russian propaganda.sanders crew used it from the beginning. nice new vacation house for jane? she likes money,that one. the pieces all fit.imo

      replyreport
   6. 79

      Hxprofposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      And chickens have lips....

      replyreport
   7. 33

      bradmasterOCcalposted 12 months agoin reply to this

      Hxprof
      Good one. BTW, no one on the left seems to answer the ? How can winning the popular vote by millions be evidence of Russian influence for the benefit of Trump. It seems to indicate that any influence was in favor of Clinton? Thanks Hxprof

      replyreport