TRump ---Is it Time To Fire Jeff Sessions ?

1. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   Sessions recused himself from a stacked deck leftist  investigation , That investigation revealed absolutely no wrongs perpetrated to date  by the Trump campaign--  tied to the original investigation's parameters .  Sessions is the one that Rosenstein normally is accountable to , Rosenstein is not only okaying wayward warrants but allowing a far too wide array of investigative topics ,  Essentially the entire special investigation  is now a headless dragon , continually corrupting the DOJ , absolutely destroying the reputation of the FBI ,
   
   Isn't it time to Fire Sessions , Fire Mueller , Fire Rosenstein , Get to work on what little reputation is left of the FBI and DOJ or the American people will rise up and  lose confidence in ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICES ? We already hate the Congress , half the people hate the White House ,
   Doesn't Democracy Demand Trust  ?
   
   
   
   
   

   replyreport
2. 61

   Randy Godwinposted 7 years ago

   Nope! In your dreams, Spanky voter! 

   replyreport
   1. 0

      PrettyPantherposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      In other news from Planet Trumpadum....

      replyreport
   2. 0

      ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Won't be long , An investigation that has no teeth , no bite , no subpoena power , no indictment  powers ?  Won't be long for the  nothing -triple -burger  ,then the shyte's going to really  hit the fan for you , no ?

      replyreport
      1. 61

         Randy Godwinposted 7 years agoin reply to this

         I've asked you this before, horse. With Mueller's leak proof investigation so far, how in the heck can you assert he hasn't found any proof of collusion?  I'd be willing to bet you've never had a part in any legal investigation before, but you act as though you have some sort of inside info which really makes you look more ignorant than usual.
         
         So, either put your "special inside info" only YOU have out there and we'll see if you have anything or if you're simply Trumping it as usual. My wager is on the latter!

         replyreport
         1. 0

            ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            Delusional is the best way to describe your hate --hope , Trump isn't even indictable by this council , Why do you think that there are special  protections for the executive office -from the infusion of any politically inspired "special councils "?  Mueller HAS leaked and  even" leaked "that Trump.....".... Is a subject and not a target of this investigation....." ? How do you explain that ?
            
            Why do you think even Bill Clinton laughed and made a whole political  joke  out of "what the definition of IS  , is ?"   You and your politically immature resistance movement is drowning in your very Trump hate , blinding you in the day to day reality of the investigations lack of any progress .

            replyreport
            1. 61

               Randy Godwinposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               You didn't answer the question as usual, Horse. Where do you get your inside info into Mueller's investigation? Simply opining doesn't cut it...
               
               And I'd have to have a smidgen of respect for Spanky before I could hate him. And that hasn't happened so far.

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  Randy , apparently you don't watch or read much news , fake as it can be , it's called" being informed "  ,The  Mueller investigation has stated , or leaked if you will , '....... Trump is a subject and not a target of the investigation ......"for one . 
                  
                  It's not" insider information "  if one actually listens to what is said BEFORE making up one's mind .  I understand however why you might not be informed other than by taking much  out of context  and emoting your judgement of someone you don't plan on giving a chance to anyway .
                  Your last paragraph says it all Randy .

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     Randy Godwinposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                     Your non-responsive answer tells it all as well.

                     replyreport
                     1. 0

                        ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                        Your typical refusal to see an answer doesn't mean its not been given .

                        replyreport