Justin Smollet charges DROPPED ? Who else smells a rat?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (49 posts)
  1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
    RJ Schwartzposted 11 months ago

    Chicago police are calling foul as charges against Smollett are dropped.  State Attorney Kim Foxx is now in the crosshairs to explain why.  The Liberal Judge even sealed the case to keep the truth hidden forever.

    Anyone else calling BS on this one ?

    1. gmwilliams profile image85
      gmwilliamsposted 11 months agoin reply to this

      It is called socioeconomic privilege...….  Wealth is power & status.  People w/power & status are the dominants.  In nature & society, not to mention culture, dominants have privileges that those who aren't dominants don't, can't, & won't ever have.    Wealthy people are the in group & people of the in group can get away w/things that others can't.   Jussie have privilege & based upon that privilege(socioeconomic wealth & status), he wasn't penalized for his actions.   MONEY TALKS......MONEY TALKS.....HOW MANY TIMES MUST I SAY THIS!  Squawk all one wants- wealth packs a wallop in our society!

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

        And how far is "Money allowed to talk", allowed to extend itself? does it include people like the Koch Brothers, using their wealth to put everyone else at a disadvantage, through inordinant political and economic power and influence. Is democracy for sale?

        How far are you allowing it to go, Grace?

        Well for me, it is a prime adversary and regardless of what rightwingers say, this is a form of abuse which I will not abide and will fight as far as I can. I give the Capitalist class and the wealthy the right to buy a larger a box of corn flakes than I can afford, but that is it. The people's right to government free from corruption by the wealthy handful is important. If the desire for that is considered as Socialism for the Rightwinger, then that is too bad.

        Bring on Sanders and Warren as the only nominees who appreciate this fact.

        1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
          RJ Schwartzposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          How about sharing your thoughts on the topic, rather than a speech on something unrelated

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

            Don't get your drawers in a bunch, RJ, I am responding to a comment made by Grace on this thread thank you.

            In several comments I expressed my opinion about this matter

    2. tsadjatko profile image58
      tsadjatkoposted 11 months agoin reply to this

      Ralph there is an obvious conclusion to draw from the Smollett affair.

      1) He was put up to creating this fraud by powerful left wing "friends" who guaranteed him they'd take care of him if anything went wrong.

      2) that's why in the face of all this evidence he stuck to his story knowing they'd save him and the scam would never be adjudicated.

      3) He will be set for life for doing the bidding of the left in trying to create another false narrative about Trump just like "Dr." Blasey Ford (I wonder how much her parents paid in bribes to get her into UNC)

      Smell a rat? he came right out of the rats' nests where people like him are spawned.

      1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
        RJ Schwartzposted 11 months agoin reply to this

        I'm hearing that this case is somehow tied to the Chicago Mayoral election - apparently both candidates are against punishing crime.....

        1. tsadjatko profile image58
          tsadjatkoposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          Yes, crime shouldn't be punished because that is discrimination. Criminals who don't get caught aren't punished so how unfair is that?

          Smollett was let go because thousands of similar false reports go unpunished in Chicago so to punish him is discriminatory.

          Really, to be treated equally under the law you can't punish crime Oh, it's ok to have laws but it's discriminatory to enforce them.

          Our courts are too crowded anyway and without crimes being punished we won't need judges like Kavanaugh who rape women!

          You can find more justification for stopping the punishment of crime here, I think there is also a clearance sale going on here for the new green deal

          https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/14468540_f496.jpg

          1. RJ Schwartz profile image91
            RJ Schwartzposted 10 months agoin reply to this

            Well it looks like the Feds are involved now - and I heard that Mrs. Foxx stated that the case was sealed "accidentally" and that she never ordered it sealed.  The Cook County system is not looking too good under the microscope.

            1. tsadjatko profile image58
              tsadjatkoposted 10 months agoin reply to this

              Sealed accidentally? How does that happen accidentally?

              You can’t believe anything anyone in her department says - they are Democrats, lying is a prerequisite.

  2. Live to Learn profile image80
    Live to Learnposted 11 months ago

    It's definitely freaky weird.

  3. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
    Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months ago

    OH COME ON! Its Blatantly Obvious!!!!

    Someone's PANTS ARE ON  F I R E !!!!
    ( hint: Smelett=Someone)

    If it had been a caucasian kid during the Obama era ...

    I shudder to think!

  4. Credence2 profile image80
    Credence2posted 11 months ago

    With all the outrages committed by whites that are excused, I should, as always, suspect the anti-Nubian attitudes will trump all among certain people. Just another reason that I question whether peaceful coexistence with mutual respect within a multicultural society can ever really be successful in America.

    1. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
      Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months agoin reply to this

      we are all Americans so why the heck not?

      The law applies to ALL equally.
      Unless we have corrupt, morally empty and easily bought and bribed judges.

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

        As for the law, it is supposed to. I would like to REALLY believe that, Kathryn.

        But, I look back at the police shootings in minority communities where motives and circumstances surrounding the events were questionable. Why should I accept that the acquittals received by the offending officers did not involve a rat or two?

        1. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
          Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          I think we should stick to the case at hand.
          What we do now, today, as everyday, sets precedent.
          We need to work toward justice, no matter what happened in the past.

        2. profile image75
          Hxprofposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          "Why should I accept that the acquittals received by the offending officers did not involve a rat or two?"

          It's possible that there was a rat or two involved with some of the acquittals. But what of the Smolett case?

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

            Hey, Prof, I explained my position on this matter to GA in an earlier comment, I am not saying that there were not irregularities regarding this case and I am not defending any of them. I just don't  like selective outrage.

            1. Live to Learn profile image80
              Live to Learnposted 11 months agoin reply to this

              Can you point to a similar discussion we have all had where the participants were of a different subset where there was no outrage?

              Thanks.

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

                I think back on the rash of questionable shooting of blacks that has risen to the attention of the press. I don't slight you in this regard because you have always acknowledged a problem could well exist. But, not your conservative buddies, they excused excessive police response as "law and order", blacks politically exploiting a "non existent problem", cultural deficits, etc.

                So, no outrage, but instead, excuse and justification

                1. Live to Learn profile image80
                  Live to Learnposted 11 months agoin reply to this

                  So, basically, you can't put forth a time when someone went out of their way to create racial tension by claiming he was  attacked, only to find out it was all made up and then being able to buy his way out of prosecution because of who he knew, and then the records were sealed as a slap in the face to justice? And we weren't all outraged?

                  Darn credence. I thought you'd be able to come in with something to back up your outrage.

                  1. Credence2 profile image80
                    Credence2posted 10 months agoin reply to this

                    That's ok, L to L. I have plenty of reasons to be outraged within the current society and culture. The things that provide outrage for me may not be of any concern to you.

    2. GA Anderson profile image92
      GA Andersonposted 11 months agoin reply to this

      What does that mean Cred? It's okay because whites have done it? It's okay because it is just a little payback?

      If Smullet had been white would this have been one of those white outrages?

      Also, what attitude does the anti-Nubian description fit in this issue?

      That was an unexpected response buddy. Do you think the black police superintendent should be as tolerant as you appear?

      GA

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

        It is not ok when anybody does it. My only point is that I just wished that the folks with obvious agendas were not so selective about the 'rats' they choose to smell while ignoring others.

        1. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
          Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          what are the "obvious agendas,"  e x a c t l y?

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

            Rightwing/ antiliberal, Conservatives? To mention a few. The kinds of people that will focus on one instance supporting their positions while ignoring 10 similar instances that do not. I think that you know.

            1. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
              Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months agoin reply to this

              What is justice in this case?

              1. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
                Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months agoin reply to this

                a full-on trial. No less.

        2. GA Anderson profile image92
          GA Andersonposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          That is a fair clarification Cred. Especially since the DA's office issued its stated reasoning. I think the "rat" has been clearly identified. It seems to be simply an 'alternative manner' of justice.

          GA

        3. RJ Schwartz profile image91
          RJ Schwartzposted 11 months agoin reply to this

          Are you somehow implying that I'm biased here Credence ?

          Am I someone with a "biased" agenda? 

          "My only point is that I just wished that the folks with obvious agendas were not so selective about the 'rats' they choose to smell while ignoring others."

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

            We all have certain amount of bias in our approaches, RJ, you lean right and comes out in your dialogue. Of course, I am going to be diametrically opposed to those principles and ideas.

            It is red herring that you or anyone else with clear political and ideological perspectives can expect come off as impartial or neutral. That is not what I see.

            1. Live to Learn profile image80
              Live to Learnposted 11 months agoin reply to this

              Take the blinders off. This has absolutely nothing to do with race. It's about bs privilege.

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 11 months agoin reply to this

                Why is everybody assuming that I am automatically in support of what Smollett did? I think that the righties always believe that we as Blacks will side with someone irregardless as to what done solely because the perpetrators  are Black. After all, that is why we all voted for Obama, right? I think that it is the Right whose biases are fixed in cement.

                There, you find the real blinders, easy to see.

                So, are whites not basically coated with the kinds of privilege, a Black or two may find just from to time? Check out Grace's comment about the power of money.

    3. Live to Learn profile image80
      Live to Learnposted 11 months agoin reply to this

      I would hope that all people of good will would be outraged when presented with lies intentionally meant to create racial tensions.

      1. profile image0
        RTalloniposted 11 months agoin reply to this

        Please, yes!

  5. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
    Kathryn L Hillposted 11 months ago

    The judge ...  or the prosecutors? or who? should be held accountable.

  6. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image95
    Wesman Todd Shawposted 11 months ago

    Leftist black privilege.

  7. Onusonus profile image78
    Onusonusposted 11 months ago

    https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/55658749_1016513088546664_6775982333087449088_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&oh=b87f0101bab3068d4c74dd59fea125ff&oe=5D4B128E

  8. StevenHall4646 profile image80
    StevenHall4646posted 11 months ago

    People say white privilege is real. Give me a break.

  9. Onusonus profile image78
    Onusonusposted 10 months ago

    No idea how he got off...
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2mPHbJX4AA-5aA.jpg

  10. Kathryn L Hill profile image79
    Kathryn L Hillposted 10 months ago

    I wonder what "the movement" is,  e x a c t l y.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)