Rather than Trump slowing down on making false statements, he's apparently doubling down on his lies according to a fact check by CNN. Last week he made 61 false claims, some against sitting congress members. Did anyone expect anything different?
Randy, by now I think everyone knows "Pansy Pants" Trump is a cowardly, corrupt, mentally bankrupt charlatan cult leader, nothing more nothing less, just like Marshall Applewhite, Jim Jones, Charles Manson etc etc: How didi it turn out for them ????
At this point Donald could disrobe completley and roll his pathetic wrinkled up obese flabby self down the entire length of Pennsylvania Ave and many would finally say that's the final straw and leave him where he flops to roast in the burning sun, but many within his small crazy core of followers including we presume some christian right charlatan leaders would just say HALLELUJAH, the orange blob is disrupting the system !!:
SAD but TRUE:
Some don't care he's a cretin, Jake. Some wallow in it...
I agree Randy, but that doesn't exonerate him from his High Crimes and Crimes Against HUMANITY right ?
Could you please tell me what the false statements are.
All 61? No Pop, go google the story on CNN if you don't believe me. Is this something you really doubt after the thousands of lies already proven false?
Here, I did it for you.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/23/poli … index.html
Yeah Randy, could you please prove to breakfastpop that the Earth is round ??
He won't search for that either, Jake. He's a Trump supporter.
Randy,
It is actually unbelievable that you are using CNN to check the facts. This organization is going down the tubes. They are losing viewership because they are no longer regraded as trustworthy. They are in the process of letting people go because their ratings are in the toilet. I did read the link you provided. As usual it was short on facts on long on innuendo. For CNN to say that facts matter is outrageous. They have been playing it fast and loose for a long time. In any event, remarks from the president about attendance at his rallies are inconsequential. Beyond a doubt he is very popular and people line up to hear him speak. As far as Omar is concerned, criticism of her and her actions. words and intent can't be critical enough. She is anti-America, anti-American, Anti-Trump and anti our way of life. I suggest you do a little more research about her background and associations. I wonder, do you not appreciate the state of our economy under the president's leadership? I wonder do you not appreciate his attempts to negotiate trade deals for our country? Do you not see that small businesses are growing because of his removal of onerous regulations? Do you not appreciate his respect for our military and his actions to bring us back to the most powerful nation in the world? Do you not applaud his defeat of ISIS? Do you not appreciate his defense of law enforcement? Do you not appreciate his withdrawal from the bogus Iran deal? The point is this Randy, you may not like Trump as a person, but he sure is a fine president who puts his money with his mouth is. He can fix problems. As he has pointed out many times, so much more could be solved if the Dems would come to the table and do their jobs.
Should we then rely on Fox News and Fox anchors who campaign for Trump?
Otherwise, your laundry list of questions sound like they come straight from Fox.
Sez you, Pop. Where did you get the info of CNN being untrustworthy? Fox News?
Randy,
Just Google CNN and sit back and read about their failures. The information is there for those who want the truth. By the way, do you watch FOX at all? Just curious because the network has a sizable representation from the left.
If biased news reporting is an example of failure, then Fox fits the bill much more than CNN.
Fox is seen by far as the most biased news network, according to independent research. And research shows that Fox News followers love that bias.
https://www.people-press.org/2009/10/29 … l-network/
Fox watchers are more misinformed than the general public, according to many research sources.
https://www.businessinsider.com/study-w … all-2012-5
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/jo … isinformed
On a related note, unlike Fox, I don't see CNN anchors campaigning with Donald Trump.
You are terribly misinformed, but I am not surprised. You and others are unwilling to see the truth. You have a narrative and you stick by it. That is precisely what the Dems are doing, and that is precisely why they are making fools out of themselves. FOX is number one because people trust them. They also always have both sides of an issue. The same cannot be said of CNN or MSNBC. Try watching it sometime.
I am terribly misinformed for giving you links to credible sites? Hardly.
Please explain why actual research shows that Fox is highly biased.
Fox thrives on bias. People like you watch it because Fox gives you what you want rather than the truth. Research proves it.
Your response is a biased double standard. How is that not "terribly misinformed"?
FYI, I watch Fox as much as I watch CNN and MSNBC.
Yes, I watch and listen to Fox News--among several sources--just to see what new fake conspiracies Hannity and the other non-journalists come up with. Fox is least likely to use factual news reporting, especially where Trump is concerned.
How many different news sources do you watch or listen to, Pop?
Notice how they ignore links going to independent research about how Fox News watchers are the most misinformed.
Yep, most cannot watch or listen to anything except Fox. It's the only way they can feel good about voting for the cretin.
I never participate in the forums, because I see them dissolve into nasty back and forths without substance. Much the same is going on in Washington, and it is a complete waste of time. When I posted some of Trump's accomplishments, not one person had anything to say. That alone speaks volumes to me. Conversations of this sort are a waste of time. At least I can say I tried.
With respect, you say you "never participate" in forums, but you are participating now.
The substance is there, but certain people refuse to accept it. For example, links to research showing that Fox News followers are less informed than anyone else who follows cable news.
Fox News followers for some reason don't respond to those links.
Randy, I listen to all of them, all of them.
Do you depend on Fox to give you the facts or simply what you want to hear?
CNN to check facts??? That's like going to a crack house for blood work.
Who do you trust for your "facts", Bruce? Limbaugh? Hannity? Do tell..
I suppose you can always fact check with Izvestia. That's what Trump does.
https://iz.ru/
I noticed that there are no replies to my post. Are my questions impossible to answer?
There's no replies to your posts breakfastpop probably because there's no reason for replies to your posts: Every rational individual already knows CNN reports the FACTS and Fox Fake Channel is simply a white nationalist propaganda outlet for the COLLAPSING oval office:
CNN fact checking?
I didn't know you could be so comical Randy, that was good for a laugh.
--CNN typically utilizes loaded emotional words in sensational headlines such as this: Trump pounces on Justice Department report findings. CNN has failed numerous fact checks from Politifact. It should be noted that these fact checks were almost exclusively from guests on their numerous talk shows and not from the reporting of actual news, which tends to be factual. TV hosts have also failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Further, CNN has retracted published stories that have been deemed as lacking evidence. Finally, CNN has published misleading information regarding GMO’s that utilize loaded fear based headlines such as this: FDA allows genetically engineered ‘Frankenfish’ salmon to be imported to US. CNN has also utilized known purveyors of pseudoscience as experts on discussion panels such as the Food Babe.
Overall, we rate CNN left biased based on story selection that often favors the left. We rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to misinformation and failed fact checks from guests and pundits. However, CNN’s straight news reporting would earn a High rating for factual reporting. (5/16/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 5/24/2019)--
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/
A link to a right-wing, anti-media website is not exactly a credible source about CNN.
Everything you say about CNN applies easily to Fox.
If you want real numbers and not propaganda, try Pew Research.
https://www.pewresearch.org/2009/10/30/ … audiences/
That's a link to a left-wing website. I guess its just a matter of perspective.
What is right-wing to you?
Anything right of AOC ... Lenin ....?
LOL. Let's try that name one more time: mediabiasfactcheck.org.
What's left-wing to you? Anything to the left of Hitler?
And of course you ignored the link (again) to a site with worldwide credibility. Can't let facts get in the way of the hate.
Again, let's stay on point. Is that your way of saying my link isn't factual or credible?
Factual or credible compared to what? Relevant to whom?
Ok... lets look at a PEW article:
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 … edia-2018/
See what it says about cable tv in there?
See how it lumps in CNN and MSNBC with Fox?
That is a way of skewing the truth, IMO. Fox has seen increases in viewership while CNN has its lights on, but no one is watching.
Wait until 2019 is over, if CNN could have negative viewership it would.
You can't run show after show, hour after hour, for two years saying the President is a traitor to the nation, needs to be impeached, is a Russian agent, etc. etc. and then have the Mueller report come out and say none of it is true... they lost all credibility, and they had none to begin with prior to their incessant spewing of Trump hate.
There is no lumping. The size of the audiences for each one is irrelevent.
It's just a survey that compares the political affiliations of the viewers of each channel.
That's how you do factual and credible research.
And you can't condemn one channel for "Trump hate" while defending another channel that is filled with nothing but "Trump love".
It's a double standard.
CNN ? And in the same sentence as false statements... No, I did not expect anything different from CNN. How are their ratings? So many apologize...So much fak news
https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/31/cnn- … fake-news/
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/cnn/false/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin … -fake-news
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/bey … sia-story/
Their ratings are pretty good in comparison to Fox Fake Channel who has an immoblie "Captive Audience" of about 2 million 80 year old racists who can't get off the geritol stained couch without assistance or a walker:
Actually, out of Fox's 3.300,000 million nightly viewers, 2,000,000 are senior citizens. The audience is 94% white. Not surprising in the least.
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainmen … rica.html/
I don't have local news anymore but I'd say the senior citizens watch Fox because it comes on earlier than the other channels.
Not everything is political Randy. Not in the real world.
WHY isn't Fox calling for Bozo Trump's REMOVAL after a continuous discovery of evidence pointing toward HIGH Crimes, Serial LIES, Felonies and Constitutional Crimes? Fox Fake Channel's elderly racist communist russian loving audience probably also suffer from severe HALLUCINATIONS, imagining Sean Hammity wearing a pointy white hood and mask as he spreads his nonsensical "Deep State" propaganda into the camera, imagining whatser name ingraham with a swastika tattoed to her forehead as she signals her affection for white nationalists by waving at them in what many consider a "Nazi Salute", ya know, anti-American hate symbols like that:
Can you point out what CNN lied about in this article, Shar?
Hitler was #1 in Germany for many years. Does that make it right?
Your links mostly go to opinions by Republicans like Sarah Palin. Irrelevant.
Fox "News" is an oxymoron if there ever was one, ab.
Let's be fair. When it comes to political coverage 'news media' is the oxy moron. They all spin it to suit their fancy.
They can still keep their name (somewhat) and be a credible news source if they change their spelling to Faux News. The slight pronunciation difference could be ignored.
It's very telling the Right only trusts Fox "News" and does not listen to anything which counters the talking heads--not journalists--on Fox.
The greatest disgusting LIAR politics has ever seen, but what else could we possibly expect from a mentally broken 73 year old nut case who exhibits almost ALL sysmptoms of Psychopathy ??
Bozo Trump's LIES have become so blatant and DELUSIONAL that you don't even need a fact checker anymore, you can simply identify them one by one as they creep out of his big fat mouth: UNREAL: This clowns LIES will surely be annotated in an "Article of IMPEACHMENT"
"REPORT: TRUMP HAS TOLD MORE THAN 10,000 LIES SINCE BEING INAUGURATED"
There is no evidence of anything you've pinned on PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP Jake and you know it! You also know what is coming next...(whether you have 5,000 unflattering pictures and/or 5,000 insults) you can't stop what's coming next.
abwilliams, many white nationalists seem to mimic their cult leader Bozo Trump who just says words without real meaning or TRUTH: The evidence is clear and overwhelming: So here's the TRUTH as much as it may make you and other white nationalists QUIVER: His seemingly uncontrollable, relentless LIES will be memorialized in an Article Of IMPEACHMENT becasue it must be to avert a future illegitimate "Trump Like" Catastrophe:
We even DISCOVERED yesterday during Mueller's Testimony that your false charlatan idol Donny even LIED to the FBI which is just another felony crime to add to the GROWING list of his ABOMINATIONS: If we just extracted that bit of NEW info from the hearing it was well worth the effort:
"President Trump has made 10,796 false or misleading claims over 869 days"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics … b92a504118
Trump fans do not care how much Trump lies or if he breaks the law. If he wasn't a sitting POTUS he'd be indicted long ago. Out of over ten instances of Trump obstructing justice, there are 5 which meet all of the criteria for the crime.
If a democratic POTUS lied a tenth as much or broke the law half as much as Trump, they'd be having a hissy fit. As I said, they apparently love criminals.
"If a democratic POTUS lied a tenth as much or broke the law half as much as Trump, they'd be having a hissy fit. As I said, they apparently love criminals."
I think you're right.....if the laws are being broken by someone who is pushing an agenda that a person doesn't like, it's FAR more likely that person will want to get rid of the politician.
I believe that every politician in Washington should be tried by citizen tribunals for lying to the American people. That would clear it out.
I agree, the more lies the stricter the punishment, right?
No Jake, the TRUTH will soon be revealed, we just don’t know who all colluded and conspired; was it only Hillary? I doubt it.....I think it took a village.
White nationalist? Is that the latest, greatest -ist word? Get it out there, throw it around a bit, see if you get a reaction? I prefer, lover of America, so I will claim that white and I will add some red and some blue.
lol, I just gave you the TRUTH ab, and when followers of Donny who by the way informed the world he was GAY on global television, have no facts, just throw Hillary, Bill or Barack in there to try and divert attention away from the TRUTH about the Trumps, we know the tired boring game by now:
Trump is TOAST and Mueller proved it: Regardless of how trump followers QUIVER, Bozo Trump has uttered over 10,000 LIES to the American people which have been documented, a horrible ugly criminal stream of BS propaganda that only a Communist Russian Puppet would do, but you simply ignore it just like Fox Fake Channel does, it seems as if your desire to worship an orange faced slobby looking 73 year old charlatan false prophet who is trying desperatley to KILL your HealthCARE is more important to you than the laws and constitution of the USA and your children's well being, and that's alarming:
You seem to fit the Fox criteria, ab. 94% white and a senior citizen to boot. Am I correct? No wonder Fox fans are more uninformed than any other news base.
It's amazing what stereotypes those on the left need to fabricate in order to attempt to trivialize other opinions. Don't have a valid argument? Just throw insults in hopes that something sticks.
Hmmm, getting a little personal there Randy. I am not quite ready for the rocking chair yet, still working in our business and putting in more hours than I care to AND cognizant of what is going on in the world around me. I am as free-thinking now, as I was in my teens. I’ve never been much of a follower....(I highly recommend it, if you’ve never tried it)
No, I am not 94% white, I, like most people, am a potpourri, including Native American.....sorry Elizabeth Warren, it’s true. The difference is, I don’t use it and abuse, I’m just me!
by JAKE Earthshine 4 years ago
Let’s keep it FACTUAL: A living and evolving repository to store ALL the public evidence, both criminal and civil which exists against Mr. Trump, his family and associates including Michael Cohen, there appears to be more than enough damning evidence to reach a guilty verdict for the average person...
by Mike Russo 6 months ago
A majority of the Grand Jury believes that perjury may have been committed by one or more of the witnesses testifying before itThe 26-member panel also rejected false claims from Mr Trump that the election had been rigged, saying it found "by a unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took...
by Randy Godwin 5 years ago
Anyone who actually knows how the FISA warrants are cleared realize they are a compilation of sometimes hundreds of reasons and known evidence before a judge or judges allow the investigators to begin. Nunes--who's already shown he'll assist Trump in throwing mud on the investigation in the...
by Jack Lee 3 years ago
Could not have happened to a more deserving crowd...I hope all of them are held accountable for all that they have done in harming our Republic...
by Sharlee 3 years ago
"Outrage has greeted media reports that American officials believe a Russian intelligence unit offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing foreign soldiers in Afghanistan, including targeting Americans.The story first appeared in the New York Times, citing its sources as unnamed...
by James Smith 10 years ago
http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/special … landscape/Note for fans of Fox News that will almost certainly jump on this:Please stop watching it, it's still awful.This survey comprehensively analysed the changing landscape in television news reporting. They found that 55% of Fox News content...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |