The need for a Civilized War.

1. 83

   Kathryn L Hillposted 4 years ago

   Democratic republics cannot exist or survive without following morals and boundaries. We are no longer following moral laws or legal laws.
   
   No lying!
   No impeaching a POTUS once he is a private citizen!
   No cancelling anyone who dares to say what is not deemed to be politically correct by the force of America's destruction!.
   
   I think we will have a civil war of some type. And we shouldn't be afraid of it. We have to use specific tactics however, to avoid, at all costs, stooping to their level. We must fight without lying, without pitting parties and races against each other, without cancelling each other and without slandering each other.
   
   Well, we have our work cut out for us.
   
   We must find and reveal the T R U T H.

   replyreport
   1. 82

      Credence2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      So, what is the banter about this time, Kathryn?
      
      It is interesting though that you suggest such solutions, as one of the few honest confessions that eminate from your side of the political spectrum.
      
      This republic has lasted through almost 250 years after virtually everything having been thrown at it. What makes you believe that we cannot weather the storm this time?
      
      Say what you like, politically correct or otherwise, but I reserve the Right hold people accountable for what they say.
      
      I am not a legal scholar liar but I would have questions about impeachment proceedings against a man no longer in office. Yet, i would have no problem prosecuting him as a private citizen on charges of inciting to riot, being an accessory to the January 6th affair. Free speech does not allow you to yell "Fire" in a crowded theatre.
      
      You take on a flippant attitude about a civil war, which must destroy America and her place in the sun. Breaking the union into shards that neither Russia nor China would want, so be careful what you wish for. No one will come away unscathed, rest assured. And, I am not interested in mutually assured destruction, so maybe we all need to regain our sanity.
      
      Your side already has race as a fundamental tenant and foundation for resentment, and mark my words it will play a prominent place in any future conflict just as it did in the last Civil War.
      
      If there will be a conflict, odds are that it will come from your side of the ideological divide.

      replyreport
      1. 95

         MizBejabbersposted 4 years agoin reply to this

         Credence, I would have preferred to not impeach him a second time and to prosecute him after he left office. However, I'm not sure what the law has to say about that. I haven't seen any intelligent discussion on a law that would allow for prosecution of a president after he becomes a private citizen. It would be a law that allows retroactive prosecution, I think. Remember, a conviction in an impeachment is not a criminal conviction. It only keeps him from running for office again. I wish some legal eagle would come in and explain whether or not a criminal suite is possible.
         I know if I were the wife or child of the policeman killed, I would attempt a civil suit.

         replyreport
2. 83

   Kathryn L Hillposted 4 years ago

   Got TRUTH?

   replyreport
3. 83

   Kathryn L Hillposted 4 years ago

   https://michaeljlindell.com

   replyreport
   1. 95

      MizBejabbersposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Got TRUTH? You certainly aren't going to get it from this jerk, the ex-junkie turned pillow guy. I think he did one drug too many.

      replyreport
4. 98

   LongTimeMotherposted 4 years ago

   There is nothing ‘civilized’ about suggesting a civil war. I am shocked to hear any Americans think it is appropriate to go to war against fellow Americans under any circumstances.

   replyreport
   1. 83

      Kathryn L Hillposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Its a war of ideas. Its a matter of reality against unreality. Truth against lies.
      Its a war against illusion and delusion. To isolate the difficulty, we need to rely on common sense and logic. The only reason we allow lies, slander, unconstitutional impeachments and the shutting down of freedom of speech is to satisfy some agenda.
      We need to figure out which ideas are detrimental for life/survival ...
      and which ideas are beneficial.
      If they (the ideas) are not logical (towards survival), they're not beneficial.

      replyreport
5. 83

   Kathryn L Hillposted 4 years ago

   There is nothing wrong with Mike's movie, what he says or who he interviews. He is someone who recovered from his addiction to cocaine. Something wrong with that?

   replyreport