"Clinton says DOMESTIC POLITICS hurting US abroad": Yahoo!

1. 58

   fishskinfreak2008posted 14 years ago

   Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100224/ap_ … ominations
   
   This has been the case since the beginning of the Obama administration and is nothing new.

   replyreport
2. 0

   Madame Xposted 14 years ago

   What a joke. Obama's party has the Executive branch, the House and the Senate. It's their own in-fighting that's holding up the works. Republicans have nothing to do with it.
   
   More left-wing propaganda

   replyreport
   1. 0

      A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Sad thing is the left wing actually think people believe its the GOP's fault. Keep thinking that all the way until November.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Actually, it's Bush's fault. Everybody knows that

         replyreport
         1. 0

            A Texanposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Oh yeah, I almost forgot.

            replyreport
            1. 61

               tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

               and, remind me again why we care what Clinton says????  Oh yeah, she's Secretary of State or something.  Wasn't she married to the guy who couldn't keep his pants on?

               replyreport
            2. 58

               fishskinfreak2008posted 14 years agoin reply to this

               OK, at least we agree on this which is SOMETHING

               replyreport
               1. 61

                  tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

                  

                  replyreport
3. 0

   Poppa Bluesposted 14 years ago

   Part of the problem is Obama's vetting process... even he can't find people that aren't either tax cheats, socialists or radicals!

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Madame Xposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      He wants socialists and radicals. As for tax cheats, I don't think he cares one way or the other. I think the reason he can't find people is because most are smart enough to know a sinking ship when they see one

      replyreport
4. 67

   MikeNVposted 14 years ago

   You mean blowing up countries and killing people isn't enough to piss people off?
   
   Now we have to be concerned what other countries think of the way we handle our affairs at home.
   
   You can't please everybody.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Observant!

      replyreport
5. 68

   Flightkeeperposted 14 years ago

   Yeah it sucks when we respond to terrorism.  Don't worry, now that President Zero is here we'll bow to everyone and let terrorists do what they want and when Iran lets go with their nuclear bomb and hits Europe, and Crazy Kim attacks South Korea, we'll just bow some more. That's how everyone likes it.

   replyreport
6. 59

   Evan G Rogersposted 14 years ago

   I believe this entire article can be filed under the ancient folder known as "Bullscheisse".
   
   This is just a ploy to try to make the Republicans feel bad for filibustering so much legislation.
   
   The real problem is that the majority of the legislation is stupid and expands federal government power.
   
   I'm pretty sure that, when China is deciding whether or not to like us, they couldn't care less about if we have trouble passing health care legislation or appoint someone to meet them or whatnot - they care more about how we're supporting Tibet.
   
   *"We're now more than a year into a new administration and whether you agree or disagree with a particular policy, a president deserves to have the people that he nominates serving him," Clinton told the Senate Appropriations Committee.* - this is complete nonsense: if someone who was appointed by Obama feels like they disagree with something, then they should speak out... that's why the prez put them their. 
   
   She's just trying to cause a stir that will give the Executive branch more power.

   replyreport