Olbermann was suspended without pay indefinitely from MSNBC for contributing money to 3 democratic candidates. Gee, I sure will miss him! Do you think he'll be back?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … redstories
I do not know if he will, sense he suposidly broke company polocy..?
not sure, but it sounds fishy...
I do not think he will be offered a sweet, sweet, deal at Fox?
I bet he wishes he would though.
Prolly not, but you gots to admit - it would be a killer show! Hmmm...maybe literally! lol
Olbermann, as a matter of principle, wouldn't take an offer from Fox.
Olbermann, Matthews, and Maddow are just as bad as Hannity, Beck, and Limbaugh - they just "analyze" things to conform to a different ideology. MSNBC and Fox should drop all pretense of being news organizations and admit that they are shills for their respective parties.
Gee, I sure hope not. Unless he comes back on Saturday Night Live, where he plays himself ad nauseum..........ha ha ha, he's never been anything but a laughable and freakish dolt, they must have been looking hard for a reason to fire him, as he surely was a growing embarrassment -- kind of like Joy Behar, can't wait until that crass and rude gal gets the boot, it is long, very long, overdue.
Tam, you DO know I was using verbal irony, right?
I know a GREAT job for Keith! Remember Hannity and Colmes? How 'bout Hannity and Olbermann? It would be the greatest show on cable!!
lol...Yeah, I understood, habee!!
Olbermann on Fox...oh my gosh...I'd pay to see that!
So would I, Tam! I think it would be a smart move for FOX.
Oh it would...put him on with Charles Krauthammer--talk about the Odd Couple, lol...
Krauthammer is a genius! (NOT verbal irony this time!)
Oh, I agree, habee. My husband, sons, and I all feel the same way about him--we could listen to him talk for hours.
I'd pay to see that! But Hannity is too much of a coward to have Keith on.
That would be priceless. Might consider that the last event at an MMA match. I would pay my hard earned money to watch that. I realize that the policy of MSNBC was to not let there quote unquote reporters not give to candidates, however this just seems wrong.
When I first saw the headline on this, I assumed it was because he was being a dork.
But then I found out it was because he had exercised his civil right to contribute to candidates of his choice. An employer should not be allowed to do that to someone. In the case of news/commentator personnel, the news organization can always just tack a disclosure blurb someplace.
Anybody remember Joe Pyne and Whiffinpool (or whatever his name was)?
I've never watched msnbc or fox new and would never trust a comentator that gets paid millions to push a certain agenda. Olbermann's suspension may seem harsh but he agreed to his company policy.
According to that article in the OP his show was geting 1.1 million viewers in October. I don't think he'll have a problem getting back in or finding a new position somewhere else. He's proven he can draw an audience, regardless of your politics.
He'll probably be back soon on MSNBC where he has lots of loyal fans.
I used to watch Countdown sometimes...until Keith bashed Hillary.
And having lots of loyal fans doesn't mean your show is good - look at Beck.
Very true. But the Olberman fans are smarter and better informed than Beck fans.
If FOX got Olbermann opposite Hannity, they could change their motto to "Fair and Unbalanced." Two crazy zealots on the same show! lol. They'd probably end up killing each other.
Really? I'm married but my wife and I kind of have an "arrangement" that could be applicable here. Does your daughter happen to be into old fat bald guys with little ambition and even less money?
If so, what's her number?
Sorry, Ron. I want her to find a nice-looking guy who's about 30 or so, with a good job! She says she wants to be single for a while, however.
I really hope she finds a nice guy. She's such a sweet girl, and she's funny, has a good job as a nurse, and she's also a great cook and homemaker.
the first rule of professional journalism is impartiality, not to mention ethics. students learn that during their first semester.
he should be fired.
That's pretty harsh. Journalist or not and Olbermann is not a journalist he is a comentator with a stated political agenda which is why people watch hime in the first place.
There is no rule that says journalists cannot donate to a political campaign except the arbitrary rules made up by the company he works for.
By that standard Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews would all have to be fired. NBC has every right to fire Olbermann, and their viewers and advertisers have every right to object. It does seem silly to suspend him. After all, he's and avowed liberal Democrat, and he is a reporter, not a commentator. It might have been smarter for NBC to have a little talk with him about complying with the rule, unless of course, they are bent on backing off a bit on their evening lineup of Democrats in view of the election results. Larry O'Donnell was added recently. He's less strident than the others, and probably smarter.
Larry O'Donnell may be less strident but he's not less paranoid than any of those libturds on the show. It was incredibly hilarious that he built up a fear scenario around Rand Paul and how he singlehandedly would prevent the debt ceiling from being raised and "wreck havoc on the world financial market".
Are you sure you meant to say that? Keith Olbermann is certainly not a reporter; he is paid to offer his opinions.
I heard that too Ralph. Apparently, Joe Scarborouhg gave money to a Republican, but he ASKED them about it first. Just a point of you have to follow the rules is all.
At least they have these rules. It would be nice if Fox did. Instead of being so blatantly biased.
And MSNBC better no get rid of him! He's the ONLY one who speaks for me!
Ralph, I thought the timing was a little coincidental, too. I'm certainly no Olbermann fan, but I don't think he should have been suspended over this.
JWest, whre ya been??
As such, if Fox "commentators" are allowed to donate to candidates (not to mention the network itself EMPLOYING candidates) -- in all fairness, MSNBC should also allow its commentators to donate.
At least set a non-journalism standard that's fair on both sides
Did you see Maher?
"Keith Olbermann is right when he says he's not the equivalent of Glenn Beck. One reports facts the other one is very close to playing with his poop."
If you owned 90% of all media, what would you do with it? What power do you think you could have? What trouble do you believe it would cause? How many people do you think you could influence?
If someone called your news station biased and deceitful, what proof would you have outside the media to back it up?
- several opinion blogs influenced by the same network?
- several internet trolls who are paid to make sure that you have the opinion they need you to have?
- radio stations that appeal to evangelic voters
- churches who only listen to conservative radio and shows like 7th Heaven?
FX, who through their arrogance makes it well known they [fox] have more viewers then CNN and MSNBC combined who will tell their viewers on their shows to not let their children watch MSNBC because what they might see might scare them so that they never will watch it.
For what purpose would they do that if MSNBC has such distastefully low ratings?
And if you can find a resource outside the media, what source do you think the viewers of fx are using?
- the bible
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|