The greatest threat to mankind is Nuclear war and the lack of protection for our natural environment.
I'm happier to see Al Core get a Nobel peace prize, than to watch Obama get one for raising the war budget to the highest level ever.
What do you think?
I agree. Obama shouldn't have won the Nobel Peace Prize. He did brought a sense of relief when he was put into office, but come on, look who he was against in the end. He also wanted to bring in lots of change, with things this country isn't ready for.
Of course everyone wants free healthcare, but also everyone wants to go to Harvard/Yale to become a doctor. What's the point in that when by the time you'd be able to practice, everyone will have set wages that are below what the average white collar worker makes now?
I think we all saw too much potential in Obama, thought he knew what he was doing, but in reality he's far from being perfect and everything he's putting forth is getting overridden by the checks and balances system. Even before Republicans became the majority, most of the Democrats weren't too sure about it either. At least that's what I make of all the news I hear/read/and watch.
As for the war, well, you can't just pull out of it. I think it's going to take another good 5-10 years before it finishes.
That makes it a tie, so far.
I think Obama has good intent, it's just the puppeteers are too strong.
Well, Obama has done nothing to earn the prize except talk a lot....and how can he be up for a peace prize when he is increasing troop levels in Afghanistan? If he were half a man he would have refused the Nobel Prize and suggested they give it to someone with actual accomplishments.
As for Gore, same problem, what exactly has he done beside perpetuate the global warming myth and line his own pockets in the process?
Al Gore. Shouldn't have gotten an Oscar either.
The rumor is he beat out a lady that helped smuggle children out of concentration camps for the Nobel. Of course, it's a rumor, but still.
Neither of them should have gotten it. They should have given it to someone who actually deserved it.
I don't think Obama should have won it. No president presiding over two wars should even be considered.
Not sure about Al Gore either.
But this also illustrates a larger point in my opinion. There are not a lot of worthy candidates in the world these days. Not a lof of MLKs or anything even close in the world today.
Interesting, isn't it, that so many of us who are so very different in other respects are so totally in agreement on this? Neither one should have won!
Neither. Gore is a climates terrorist, and Obama has not done enough (yet) to win a peace prize. Maybe the Norwegians should have waited until after Obama pulled the US Army out of Iraq, Afghanistan, the DMZ, etcetera before they gave him the award.
Winning a Nobel peace for killing poor people and burning villages is no prize to me. War solves nothing and a faction of the war budget would solve the worst killer of all, poverty.
On the other hand, who is doing much about the environment, do you trust the politic or the rich will to do anything about it for us?
Global Warning is real; I have lost 80% of my ice and snow sculpture business over it. In Vancouver the most dangerous Olympic ever was due to warming. In the pass 25 years ice has melted the size of Alaska and Texas combined in parlor region. Floods are the largest natural environment killer of all.
What natural abuse will it take to convince people its real, maybe 100 million deaths in a few floods, should do it?
Once Henry Kissinger won it during the Vietnam War it was all over.
In 1973, Kissinger and Le Duc Tho were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for the Paris Peace Accords of 1973, "intended to bring about a cease-fire in the Vietnam war and a withdrawal of the American forces," while serving as the United States Secretary of State.
Unlike Tho, who refused it because Vietnam was still at war, Kissinger accepted it.
On January 13, 1977, Kissinger was presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Gerald Ford.
Neither of course.
If one had to choose between them, then it would be Gore. Obama had done absolutely nothing to justify the Nobel. At least Gore had been around awhile.
It seems most people here; think both of them should have not gotten the Nobel Prize. But some may consider Al Core to win it.
I for one, think Al Core deserved it, because some day, it will be our Health that will becomes the bottom line rather than money.
"Who should have not won the Nobel peace prize, Al Core or Obama?"
I think that whole Nobel peace prize should be trashed. Or at least the committees. A lot of the picks are basically for political or politically correct reasons and have nothing to do with the winner accomplishing humanitarian goals.
Neither should have gained it. I think it is an insult to the Nobel Prize system that people who genuinely have helped the world have been overshadowed by these people.
by egiv 13 years ago
I can't wait to read about how big of a joke the (Norwegian) Nobel Prize selecting committee is and that since nazi Germany loved Hitler and so many love Obama, it logically makes Obama Hitler.Can you people be proud for once that we have a great leader? He is not perfect, nobody is, but for god's...
by quimbicla 13 years ago
President Obama Baback after nine months deserves Nobel Peace Prize?
by Brenda Durham 12 years ago
Led by an overwhelming majority of American citizens, with predominantly New Yorkers on the front lines, picketers in front of the White House succeeded in making Mr. Obama vow to return his erroneously-gotten Prize. He said now he understands that it ain't okay to cause chaos WITHIN America...
by neonline69 13 years ago
What do you think are the reasons for which the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Barack Obama?Barack Obama is the fourth President to win the Nobel Peace Prize behind Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter. Tell with us why YOU think President Obama won this prestigious award.Leave...
by Cassie Smith 9 years ago
Will they take away Obama's Nobel Peace Prize?Obama is threatening to attack Syria. Without approval of the UN. Without even the approval of Congress, until he found out he was the only who was going to attack Syria because the Brits pulled out. Obama certainly isn't a peacemaker, and...
by Cassie Smith 10 years ago
Should they take away the Nobel Peace Prize from Obama?The New York Times article said that Obama personally handles the decisions regarding the killings and assasinations when it comes to the war on terrorism. He doesn't sound like the ideal recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|