One headline on my home page called it a Tea Party Uprising when the House rejected a Patriot Act extension.
NewsMax, the printed version of the Faux News Network had this to say: US House Rejects Extending Anti-Terrorist Provisions
//The Republican-controlled House defeated a bid to extend for nine months the government’s authority to conduct roving wiretaps of suspected terrorists, along with two other expiring provisions of the Patriot Act counter-terrorism law. Republicans leaders were unable to get the needed support even as they held open the roll call on the measure for about a half-hour beyond its 15-minute allotted time.//
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/BNSTAF … /id/385424
The Washington Post said this: House rejects measure that would extend key Patriot Act provisions through December
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/201 … id=topnews
Wired.com offered a different perspective or should I say the rest of the story?
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/0 … es+2%29%29
//Those wanting Patriot Act reforms should probably stop applauding the House’s inability Tuesday to block three key spy provisions in the law from expiring at month’s end.
That’s because the House took procedural steps Wednesday that virtually guarantee those provisions would be extended in an upcoming vote.
The reauthorization bill failed by seven votes Tuesday because it needed two-thirds backing.
But not any more.
It required two-thirds Tuesday because it was considered emergency legislation and did not go through the House Rules Committee ahead of the vote. But on Wednesday, the legislation was sent to that committee, where it was approved 7-2. That means only a majority vote of the House is necessary for passage, and to extend the spy measure to Dec. 8.//
They claim to defeat a bill that they made sure will pass in a couple of days.
Oh the games people play
every night and every day....
(remember that song from the '70s?)
Hopefully the Tea Party folks are watching this all play out. Their first response was that "our leadership didn't inform us on how this issue was to be handled" By leadership they meant the GOP. THATS NOT THEIR LEADERSHIP! The people who elected them are!
do you remember the rest............
'Cross our hearts and we hope to die,
that the other was to blame'?
A person has to be extremely naive or a moron to think that any elected politician will do exactly as they want them to do.
How many liberals are outraged at Obama for not following the exact path they wanted him to follow?
My guess is that the extension will happen in some form, just have to wait til politicians get over being politicians.
I don't know about you, but to me the line between zingy and spiteful is when a person gloats about someone else's personal misfortune. I have never taken pleasure in anyone's personal troubles including Clinton's. I have great sympathy and sorrow for the spouses and children of those that have fallen because of their own inadequacy. People come before politics in my book.
Hope your clients get utmost benefit of your sweetness!
Wow. So the very same Tea Party representatives who unseated or defeated GOP representatives to do the "people's" bidding are now admitting they don't have a clue what they're supposed to do and are not only looking to but blaming this on the establishment GOP?
Wait a minute. This is sounding awfully familiar...
"Don't blame me, blame the lamestream media."
"It's all their fault!"
"I'm the victim here!"
If you voted for a Tea Party candidate you're probably feeling just a tad ... disappointed (trying my best not to be cruel and spiteful today )
No your not!LOL Your being spitefull today!LOL So what? It happens to us ALL! But yes, you get my drift on the issue exactly. These guys have already fallen into the status quo trap on the hill. Make no mistake, the Tea Party has been good in the sense that it makes Elected Officials LISTEN to their constituentcy. That benefits both parties voters. Don't believe me? Take a look at the voting prior and after the Tea Party came on to the scene. Several Congressmen have changed their position or were conviently absent on contriversal votes. Congressmen from "Blue Dog" states have had to move back to the center. RINO's have had to move further right. If only for appearances.
Very true, CJ. We should expect the presence of TP members to influence how Congress votes! If they have no effect,then they are not doing their job!
I better go take my sweetness pill before I go see clients today!
Apparently it's a thin line between zingy and spiteful .
by Susan Reid 7 years ago
Every day we hear from hubbers about how Obama is out to destroy the Constitution. Across this great nation there is a movement of very vocal, very serious "pro-contitutionalists."The Constitution is suddenly quoted and defended like the Bible.It's all the vogue -- ALL OF A SUDDEN.My...
by PrettyPanther 5 years ago
I'm sick of hearing that liberals don't care about the erosion of our civil liberties "now that Obama is doing it." I have a good memory, folks. And I remember VERY CLEARLY that liberals were the the vocal opponents of the Patriot Act BEFORE it was enacted. I remember...
by Evan G Rogers 7 years ago
This link shows a list of TEA PARTY CANDIDATES that actually voted FOR the Patriot Act.http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/tyner5.1.1.htmlHYPOCRISY!!! OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!! Less than a year in and they've sold their souls.If you representative is on that list, demand they vote against the accursed...
by Evan G Rogers 7 years ago
Rand Paul recently tried to filibuster the passage of the continuation of completely tyrannical aspects of the Patriot Act. But both the House and the Senate were able to end it and pass the bill.http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-201 … e_facebookObama signed it into law just a few minutes...
by William R. Wilson 7 years ago
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20029393-281.htmlThe House Republicans' first major technology initiative is about to be unveiled: a push to force Internet companies to keep track of what their users are doing.
by edmondpogi 7 years ago
Should the Patriot Act continue as is?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|