This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (14 posts)

Wisconsin Votes Back: Take THAT Governor Walker!

  1. Mighty Mom profile image85
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    Justice David Prosser will no longer be your proxy on the state supreme court. Guess you won't be stripping unions of their bargaining rights after all.

    With historically high turnout -- 1.5 million people for an April election -- Wisconsin voters on Tuesday voted to send Gov. Scott Walker’s staunchest ally on the Wisconsin Supreme Court packing.

    Justice David Prosser was a very right-wing state legislator before becoming a very right-wing, pro-corporate judge on the state’s high court. He had made statements indicating that he would be little more than Walker’s proxy on the court, especially when hearing the inevitable legal challenges against Walker’s legislative assault on workers and the middle class.

    Of course, corporate cash poured in by the boatload to help Prosser hold his seat -- via expenditures by groups like Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the so-called Citizens for a Strong America (CSA), Wisconsin Club for Growth and the State Tea Party Express.


    Prosser’s opponent JoAnne Kloppenburg’s victory was a close one -- only a few hundred votes -- and Prosser will likely request a recount. But just a month ago, Prosser was polling way ahead of Kloppenburg.

    And if this victory stands, it will be only the fifth time a Wisconsin Supreme Court justice has been unseated since the court's establishment in 1852.



    Source: PFAW.org

    1. tony0724 profile image59
      tony0724posted 7 years agoin reply to this
      1. Mighty Mom profile image85
        Mighty Momposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Wow!
        Thanks Tony!
        I stand corrected.
        Although, I must say, that is pretty sketchy.

        I feel bad for that poor woman who is taking the blame for this.
        She is probably one of those hated government employees....

        1. Jim Hunter profile image61
          Jim Hunterposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          Don't you wish you had a delete button?

          "Take THAT Governor Walker!" lol lol lol lol

          Democrats.

          1. dingdondingdon profile image58
            dingdondingdonposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            Yeah, stupid Democrats not being able to see into the future and predict a mistake! Those idiots, eh?

            1. Jim Hunter profile image61
              Jim Hunterposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              You should consult your Obamagod more often.

              Ameeeeeeeeeen

    2. eileeneleanor profile image55
      eileeneleanorposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks for this news.  I have my fingers crossed.

  2. Ralph Deeds profile image63
    Ralph Deedsposted 7 years ago

    I predicted something like this would result because Wisconsin is historically a strong labor union state. The current State-Federal unemployment compensation system is patterned after a program developed in Wisconsin. Wisconsin also passed the first workers' compensation statute. In the 1950s or 60s the UAW struck Kohler Co. for five years or thereabouts.

  3. Mighty Mom profile image85
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    Well according to the huffingtonpost.com article Tony posted, the exclamations of victory were premature.
    Apparently several ballots were not counted last night and -- surprise, surprise -- these ballots decidedly swing the vote back in Prosser's favor.

    Jim -- Who needs a recount when you can conveniently find thousands of votes? No, I don't wish for a delete button.
    Publicizing the battle for this position and the rally behind the challenger is still important.

    1. tony0724 profile image59
      tony0724posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      MM a Democratic representative has already verified they were legit.

    2. Jim Hunter profile image61
      Jim Hunterposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      "Jim -- Who needs a recount when you can conveniently find thousands of votes? No, I don't wish for a delete button.
      Publicizing the battle for this position and the rally behind the challenger is still important."

      Maybe you can wing on down to Florida and find some votes there?

      "Take THAT Governor Walker!" lol lol lol lol

      Thats classic.

  4. Mighty Mom profile image85
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    April 8th
    I find it quite odd that this change of events isn't getting more media play. Not only did I NOT receive an update in my inbox (from the usual sources). But a repeated Google search of "Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Results" comes up surprisingly empty --even when I qualified search with "April 8, 2011!

    I DID find this interesting piece of information about Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus:

    Kathy Nickolaus demonstrated a lack of professionalism that is expected of an official with her responsibilities.  She has also failed to be professional over time, and in so doing helped create the chaos that now engulfs Wisconsin. 

    Kathy Nickolaus is also very suspect in this vote fiasco in light of the fact she was granted immunity after a caucus scandal when she worked as an Assembly Republican Caucus Employee while David Prosser was both Minority Leader and later as Speaker of the State Assembly.

    Simply put, what took place in Waukesha County reeks to the heavens!  Kathy Nickolaus must own up to the massive problem, and resign.

    Late Thursday the Waukesha County clerk announced that the vote total in Tuesday’s Wisconsin Supreme Court race had been mistaken, and that the corrected numbers changed the outcome of the entire election.

    This error seems more than fishy given the past working relationship Kathy Nickolaus has had with David Prosser.  For thirteen years Nickolaus worked for the Wisconsin State Assembly Republican Caucus as a data analyst and computer specialist.  During that time Prosser served in powerful elected positions in the State Assembly.

    Before Kathy Nicklous resigned in 2002 from her partisan job she  was granted immunity to testify about her role in the caucus.  The Republican Caucus was under investigation for using state resources (tax dollars) to secretly run campaigns.

    There is no way that I buy into Kathy Nickolaus’ near-tearful explanation of how Brookfield was misplaced when counting and adding the numbers.  There is no degree of plausibility given all we know about her.  Kathy Nicklous’ partisan dealings that landed her in the legal arena makes this latest, and most unbelievable turn of events, not rising to the smell test.

    ... but wait, it gets better!

    Kathy Nickolaus’ lack of professionalism is underscored by the fact Waukesha County has what can only be described as an outdated and rickety means of keeping  tabs of votes cast.  She has insisted the county results be kept on an antiquated personal computer, rather than upgrade to a new data system being utilized statewide. 

    When confronted about the problems in the past she smiled in face of the facts that were presented to her.

    The Waukesha County Board also heavily criticized the clerk after she brushed aside their recommendations for improving election security. At one point during a hearing in January, board chairman Jim Dwyer grew exasperated with Nickolaus and said, “There really is nothing funny about this, Kathy. Don’t sit there and grin when I’m explaining what this is about.”

    Again, what has occurred in Waukesha County regarding the court election does not meet the smell test.

    Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Barca gave voice late Thursday for voters all over Wisconsin in a blunt statement. 

    It is especially troubling that she waited more than 24 hours to report the startling discovery and then did so at a press conference and only after she verified the results. This makes it all the harder to challenge and audit the integrity of the vote. 

    The partisan, political history of Ms. Nickolaus and the serious concerns about the quality of her performance found in an audit raises the question of whether an investigation is warranted. The public deserves to know that the votes were counted properly.

    ...the damage that Kathy Nickolaus has done to our election process in Wisconsin is no small thing.  The people’s faith in casting a ballot has been damaged by the actions undertaken in the last 48 hours from the Waukesha County Clerk.

    It is time that Kathy Nickolaus resign her office.

    The people of Waukesha County and all of Wisconsin deserve no less.

  5. profile image64
    logic,commonsenseposted 7 years ago

    Democrats can never admit they lost.  They run to another state or they say the vote was rigged or they blame some right wing commentator.
    The truth is, the people that pay the bills are tired of the self righteous elitists spending our money on buying off the unions, as well as handing it out to every little special interest group to make them feel better about themselves.  Handing it out to corporations that donated to their campaigns, and then denigrating corporations for their greed.
    Not that the Republicans are much different, just a different set of special interest groups.
    At least they don't run like babies from a fight.

  6. Mighty Mom profile image85
    Mighty Momposted 7 years ago

    hi logic,commonsense
    I agree. I'm not thrilled with how the Wisconsin Dems handled that vote situation. It sets a bad precedent for other legislators.

    But this election -- I don't know what to think.
    It's just really puzzling that there is so LITTLE media coverage about the election results. Considering how MUCH media attentio/scrutiny was focused on WI for so long.

    Then again, in the bigger context of the federal budget impasse/looming govt shutdown and events in the Middle East, Wisconsin's Supreme Court Justice doesn't cut it as front-page news....

 
working