I only wanted to stop by to give you a round of applause. Okay, I'll comment, too.
It seems that many republicans suffer from memory loss. Perhaps another explanation is that they had their eyes glued to the terror alert level during Baby Bush's presidency and couldn't pay attention to anything else.
I didn't say I wouldn't vote for Santorum. I said I wouldn't vote for Bachmann, Perry, or Newt. I don't really know much about Santorum. And I don't think I could vote for Obama now, after he signed the NDAA.
Georgia W. Bush did 171 recess appoints. Bill Clinton 139 recess appoints. President Reagan 240 recess appoints. Georgia H Bush 77 recess appoints. Presidnet Obama so far is 28 recess appoints during his first term. So the winner by far was President Reagan. I don't recall the Republicans complaining back then? But today President Obama is attacked? Go figure!
It's all a stupid game perpetrated by people who care little about doing the people's business.
"The president’s right to do so is clearly stated in the Constitution: the recess appointments clause empowers him to “fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”
However, since the twilight years of the George W. Bush administration, the Senate has tried to nullify this power by holding “pro forma” sessions every three days, during what no one doubts would otherwise be an extended recess. In these sham sessions, manifestly serving only to circumvent the recess appointment safety valve, a lone senator gavels the Senate to order, usually for just a few minutes; senators even agree beforehand that no business will be conducted.
It is this transparently obstructionist tactic to which President Obama said “enough,” striking a badly needed blow for checks and balances with strong support both from the text and the original purpose of the recess appointment clause."
Yes, technically the Senate is not in recess. Like I said, it's a stupid game wasting time and money that the American people do not have the luxury of wasting.
The Senate is not in recess. This technique was pioneered by Democrats while George W Bush was President in order to thwart the long established and well used ability to make recess appointments. Recess appointments last only until the next Congress begins - a maximum of two years. I don't care if recess appointments are made or not. The problem is that Democrats are now being hoisted on their own petard and are whining about it.
As for "how a Republican thinks" I am not a Republican. I am a conservative and a (small r) republican.
And yet which party instituted these sessions? Wasn't it Obama's party? Did he ever sit in a "proforma session?" If so than it sounds like Karma to me.
As for not having the money - Obama just requested another $1.23 trillion nonexistent dollars be added to the already $6 trillion that has been added to the deficit under his brief watch. I don't think the "wasting" of money is an issue to Obama or the Democrats.
As for wasting time - isn't it all just a waste of time.
It's amazing how it's twisted to say, Democratics did it so who are they to say. But Republicans have had more recess appointments in the past then President Obama. With President Reagan taking the most followed by President Clinton.
I am not saying ALL Republicans are, I am just wondering why anyone would actually stay with a party that is clearly not on the same page as most of America? Most (not all) but most who are die hard right Republicans...
in light of the current sociopolitical and socioeconomic situation regarding the United States of America? Do you believe that President Obama is doing the best job he can under the circumstances? Do you maintain that...
Okay, I know this probably isn't that big of a deal to some folks, but i thought i'd bring it up anyway. On the radio the other day, I was listening to two political analysts, and one of them still insists on...