Is the United States justified to declare war on governments that blatantly supress their citizens' want for freedom and kills large amounts of the population?
There needs to be a very good cause for any war. Civil Wars are internal problems of individual countries.
This is one of the hardest questions to answer. Any free nation has a moral obligation to protect the rights of people no matter where they are.
However, the United States first has an obligation to protect its own citizens. Thus by engaging in a war with a belligerent country, the United States may be exposing itself to retaliation by that country or other countries.
The short answer is yes, our country is justify in helping to protect basic human rights.
The difficult answer is that it is not always possible. The abuse of human rights is so widespread in this world, the United States does not have the resources to be everywhere, all the time.
So the realistic answer is yes, if we have the means an capability of doing something without endangering the health and safety of our own country and stand little if any risk of retaliation.
That sounds like a political answer and I apologize for that. But we live in a political world, where it is not always possible to do the things we want to do. Also, if there is an established government in that country, you face other challenges under international law.
I hope someone has a better answer, but this is the best I can do.
I agree with Larry about we can't be everywhere. But, the only things that frustrates me is when people claim because of that we should help no one. That's why I think you're right to include your "political" reason. I think its logical to think that way.
I think your question is too generalized to be answerd with any specifics.
There are no absolutes. But in general, if one anaylizes the motiation for wars, it's usually for economic reasons.
Tells us which wars and which governments you are concerned about and maybe we can give a more specific answer.
Fair enough peoplepower73. In my head I was thinking about Iran primarily and Iraq.
In my opinion, the Iraq war was totally unjustified. There were two reasons for that war. Saddam Hussien posed a threat to Israel and we wanted control of the oil. It was done under the guise of converting an entire Muslim country to democracy, which was and is totally unsucessful.
The conflct in Iran is for the same basic reason which is to protect Israel. Iran does not have weapon system to reach this country, so therefore, they are not a threat to us...of course, this is all in my humble opinion.
I would ask if the US was justified in declaring wars on countries whose governments don't agree with the US.
Murray Rothbard argued that there are only a few "just" wars.
Those of self-defense, and those of retrieving freedom from tyranny.
The second type is only to retrieve your own freedom, or to voluntarily help others with your own property.
by AdsenseStrategies 8 years ago
Even though there is a perception that the United States gives large amounts of aid to Africa, the fact is that the Chinese and the Arabs are licking their lips at all of that mineral resource wealth that Africa holds, and are in the process of filling the gap left by the West's lack of interest in...
by StripedCrunchy 6 years ago
Cubaâ��s totalitarian regime controls all aspects of life through the Communist Party (CP) and its affiliated mass organizations, the government bureaucracy and the Department of State Security. The latter is tasked with monitoring, infiltrating and tormenting the countryâ��s beleaguered...
by Laura Thykeson 5 years ago
I know this is controversial, but it is a honest question, I promise. Why does our country feel theI know this is controversial, but it is a honest question, I promise. Why does our country feel the need to force democracy on countries that have lived under religious laws for thousands of years? I...
by Rajab Nsubuga 7 years ago
When the Jews rebelled against the Roman Empire in AD 70, Titus the emperor destroyed Jerusalem. From then the Jews stood apart from other peoples in two important aspects. One was that in general they did not intermarry and assimilate with the other peoples of the region. The other was their...
by ryankett 7 years ago
Firstly, let me point out that I am a full supporter of the continued efforts in Afghanistan. Whilst I am still slightly cynical of the possible underlying motives, there can be no doubt that the country under Taliban rule was one which seriously oppressed its people and was (and still is) a school...
by Dennis L. Page 5 years ago
Why aren't governments calling China, Communist China anymore?I know that China is a global force to be reckoned with, but I'm confused at why the world is no longer calling them "Communist China?"
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|