...never doubted it for a minute...maybe one day all will be revealed about every political crime on all sides of the aisle, for now this will do
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/wikileaks-re … on-crimes/
It's happening in this election.
Any Ron Paul fan can explain it to you.
It's believable. Maybe wikileaks can serve a useful truthful purpose after all.
And the article mentions the McCain dilemma. I agree his behavior (his nonaction) was baffling. He could've been President, I really believe, if he had wanted it bad enough. He had the conservative vote and he had the military at his beck and call; they just needed a leader to give them the commands to protect America. But he didn't want it bad enough to see this beloved Nation ripped apart. Better that we've had to endure 4 years of nonsense and soft tyranny (painful as it is) than to have another Civil War at that time since all the liberals were intent on following Obama blindly.
If this is true, why isn't it all over the news?
...you haven't heard...MSM is bought and paid for
I find it hilarious that this forum post only got one real response.
I guess that shows you the character of the democrats on hubpages.
Ummm, no not really. It's just...
You DO remember the prez elections of 2000 and 2004?
You remember the articles that came out alleging that the R's stole the elections?
You see, it's already been revealed that crimes have been committed. And what happened?
So sorry--you guys want sympathy or outrage when you claim it on the other side?
What was it you said to us?...oh yeah: STFU.
Besides, Wikileaks has it's own problems in the fair and balanced department, if you get my drift.
Get over 2000, an unofficial count performed by e left leaning college that wanted to proved Bush stole it backfired when the count showed Bush won by a bigger margin than what was certified.
Oh OK.....you get over 2008!
think the Right will give it up? I still hear about Chappaquidick.....40+ years ago.
What should I get over? Obama won a decisive victory. I can accept that, so what should I get over?
Get over the fact that illegal activity is accepted by your side as long as you're the ones doing it.
Because in 2000, you didn't want to hear about it.
Hilarious that this isn't getting more replies.
I'm going to keep bumping this to show the hypocrisy of the left.
(Don't worry, conservatives, your day will come)
The attitude in America is "who cares".
I came on this site screaming about 9/11 and the Buscho horror years, and all I got in response was "Oh you Republican hating anti-semite".
What do you want in return?
No that is not what you got, that is what you spin the responses you get into. That is the new Dems talking point, Oh poor me, they attack me. Sorry, pointing out the misinformation spouted by the left is not attacking. Disagreeing with Obama is not racism, it was not racism when I disagreed with Bush, or with Clinton. The Tea Party obstructs, despite doing exactly what they said they would do, oppose the out of control spending in Washington, Oh they are baggers, seems to me they are the only ones who are doing what they said they would do when they went to Washington. Oh sorry, Obama is making good on his promise of $5 gas prices. And of course he did deliver hope and change. he changed things for the worse and now we hope to vote him out.
I want you to fight against Obama's wars.
Then you can't insult Bush for his wars unless you're a hypocrite.
Some people do it because they have to, others because they want to.
And I can insult whomever I want.
YOU are hypocritical in my eyes for claiming "freedom", and supporting a man who signed the personhood amendment!
I was called an anti-semite and a Republican-hater plenty of times. For my stance on 9/11.
Was called a hater by all sides when I spoke after the Loughner shooting. Said I was spreading hate on hubpages....
and IF you hold a sign with Obama as a voodoo witch doctor and a bone through his nose..you are a racist!
Since you didn't do that , then ......what did you say?
Is this why you gave up fighting against Obama's tyranny?
I fought against Bush.
I think some people do things because they have to, and others do them because they want to.
You need to pay closer attention to nuances, not loud-mouths.
I follow my intuition, not what is going on out there. There are people behind the scenes ending this madness IMO. I think Obama is one of them.
ANY folks who steal elections by fraud should not be taken seriously when they say they promise to defend the Constitution...anybody! How hypocritical can hyposrisy become?!
The fact that the Democrats didn't put out any Democratic challenger to oppose Obama proves that the Democratic Party is just as capable as the GOP of playing dirty pool...and they've done it1
No kidding! I wonder what's up with that?! Surely they know he's a worse liability than they first thought. But then....maybe they're still in head-buried-in-sand mode.
by Jack Lee 9 months ago
As most of you know, I support many of Trump’s initiatives and I defend him here on hubpages when he is unfairly criticized by the media and others.You may also know I did not vote for Trump or Hillary in the 2016 election.Now, after over one year in office, and the signing of the latest Omnibus...
by Cleanclover 2 years ago
Obama has threatened retaliation against Russia for election hacking. Hold elections again?If elections were hacked why don't they hold elections again after beefing up the security?
by Scott Belford 19 months ago
The Ds lost their fourth special election. Some say those are Big Wins for Rs and Disaster for Ds. Other optimistic souls say each was a Win for Ds because they were close. While I tend to agree with the last statement, I won't go so far as calling it a win. Instead, I call...
by Longhunter 7 years ago
If Obama sees he's about to loose the 2012 election, do you think he'll suspend the election in a bid to stay in office?
by Greensleeves Hubs 5 years ago
I ask this question because I feel a sense of dilemma. I hate extremism in general and religious extremism in particular. I am not sure exactly what the policies of the Muslim Brotherhood government are, but the idea of any government associated so directly with religion worries me greatly -...
by Audrey Selig 4 years ago
Do you think Mitt Romney could beat Hilary Clinton for president in next election? Explain.Romney may try another run at presidency.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|