What do you think of Princess Kate Middleton being pregnant?

Jump to Last Post 1-16 of 16 discussions (29 posts)
  1. Nell Rose profile image90
    Nell Roseposted 5 years ago

    What do you think of Princess Kate Middleton being pregnant?

    I know many people love the royals around the world, but there is a lot of feeling that one more leech in the royals is on its way. What with people starving, no homes and low wages, I used to love the royals, but now it just drives me mad! So, whats your take on it?

  2. Sunshine625 profile image92
    Sunshine625posted 5 years ago

    Woohoo! I'm excited for William and Kate. A royal baby! 4th is line, this baby bumped Harry to 5th place. I hope she feels better soon and is released from the hospital.

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Linda, lol! I'll let you off then! seriously I do see the historical relevance it just sticks in my throat!

  3. ThePracticalMommy profile image95
    ThePracticalMommyposted 5 years ago

    It had to happen soon, as most royals try to have a baby within the first year of marriage. To have extreme morning sickness, though...yikes! I just can't wait to see what all of the name possibilities will be. It's making me want to choose my baby's name asap so that I can say it wasn't influenced by their choice in names!

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      congrats on you having a baby! yeah! lol! as for the morning sickness I just had a cuppa tea and a ginger biscuit maybe thats what kate should have done! lol!

  4. Gordon Hamilton profile image97
    Gordon Hamiltonposted 5 years ago

    Hi, Nell

    First off - I didn't know she was until I read your question! (Then again, probably not a lot of sports pages reported it, in Britain or elsewhere... wink )

    Personally, I think it's wonderful news. As a passionate royalist and loyalist, I am intensely proud and protective of our royal family and am always delighted to hear news of further progenies to carry on the line. With so little left to be cheerful about in the modern day UK and the decimation of so many things we once held so dear, I personally think our Royal Family is one of the biggest symbols of our nationhood and our pride as a people.

    What a great Christmas present for the happy couple!

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks Gordon, yes you may be right. I do tend to sit on the fence about it, and all things royal. Sometimes I love it, other times when things get hard I get all grouchy! haha!

  5. Jackie Lynnley profile image88
    Jackie Lynnleyposted 5 years ago

    Ah, Nell, well now you know how I feel! I hear too this illness happens mostly with twins! How exciting would that be? I don't think about their money, they get none from me and they are royalty and my bible teaches that is none of my concern since I look to none of them for my support here nor there so I just enjoy the fantasy! May she be well soon and have a great pregnancy and bring the world many smiles!

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks Jackie, yes you may be right there! maybe I am suffering from the bah humbugs! lol! I am sure I will get excited about it soon too, thanks!

  6. fpherj48 profile image79
    fpherj48posted 5 years ago

    I think I know how she got that way.  You too?............I'm simply delighted for the Royal couple....!   smile  What's one more spoiled little RICH brat in that great big Castle?

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Haha! thanks paula, its just the privaledge that gets to me, but maybe I am getting old and cynical!

  7. Larry Fields profile image77
    Larry Fieldsposted 5 years ago

    Hi Nell. Being an American, I'm mostly indifferent to royals everywhere. And royal news is mildly amusing at best. The last time I checked, it was still legal for rich people--royals included--to have children. However I'm not sure that it's possible for the children of royals to have normal lives.

    By the way, we did have a 'royal' of our own in Northern California back in the 19th Century. A man who called himself Emperor Norton 'held court' in the city of San Francisco. People who were enamored of his chutzpah made it possible for him to survive without doing much real work.

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Larry, lol! sounds a great way to live, good old Norton!

  8. MickS profile image68
    MickSposted 5 years ago

    On one level I am happy for the couple and the very human joy they must be feeling at being parents in the future. On another level I just think that there will be another aristocratic parasite living off our backs.

    1. cfin profile image75
      cfinposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Your last activity. MIckS: "Probably because the Chinese farmers are more efficient at growing garlic on a large, industrial scale than US farmers.", Keep your nose out of other countries policies indeed. Hypocrisy of the highest level.

    2. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Sorry cfin, but whats that got to do with it? maybe you have eaten to much garlic!

    3. MickS profile image68
      MickSposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Sorry, that has nothing to do with it, the question asked why ... I offered a possible reason. I didn't tell US farmers how to run their work practice or society. I'm obviously very important to you to trawl through my posts to grasp at any failing.

  9. MG Singh profile image43
    MG Singhposted 5 years ago

    Frankly I dont understand whats the importance of this news. There are pressing things in the world than to bother about this normal act.

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks MG.

  10. christopheranton profile image70
    christopherantonposted 5 years ago

    I think people who declare themselves unemployed and claim benefits, when they are earning undeclared income on the side, are much more a drag on the country than any amount of royals.
    Also Nell, you need to correct the wording in your question. The lady  is no longer Kate Middleton. She is now Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cambridge.
    Sorry if I come over as a bit abrupt. I just hate "the politics of envy".

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Fair enough christopher, I just think some of the royals are leeches, such as edward, and andrew. the unemployed however should be able to earn a bit more, there dole money is equivalent to one royal meal! not good, but thanks for your opinion.

  11. Jaclyn Albanese profile image59
    Jaclyn Albaneseposted 5 years ago

    I think it's an exciting time for them. I think it will be the ultimate parenting challenge to try to give their child(ren) somewhat "normal" experiences in their upbringing.

  12. IDONO profile image81
    IDONOposted 5 years ago

    This isn't even news. Now, if the baby is born black, that will be news!!!

  13. joanveronica profile image80
    joanveronicaposted 5 years ago

    I'm so happy for the two future parents, they are such a charming couple! As I don't pay taxes in UK, I have no problems about income to consider and I can just admire the display of royalty from afar. What I do know is that, human nature being what it is, if Kate doesn't produce a child relatively soon, the news would be full of question of the "What is the matter? Is something wrong?  Is the marriage a go?, etc." type. I also rather liked the idea of Harry being pushed further away in the line. (I admit to being rather old-fashioned in my views, can't stand those pranks and weird attitudes).
    I wish both the parents and the new baby the best of luck!

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks joan, it will be interesting to see what she has, I am going to say a boy! lol!

  14. Judy G Gillis profile image76
    Judy G Gillisposted 5 years ago

    The news is interesting but not surprising. Not surprising in that most women who marry into the royals (I would venture to say all women who do - with the exception of Charles' most recent bride) are seen after one fashion or another as breeding stock to produce heirs. The late and great Diana, Princess of Wales was seen that way. I wonder if they get sick and tired of being so famous that the 'razzi' bend over backward to get photo ops of them in embarrassing or compromising situations - which the rest of us have every day, but we don't have a troop of photographers following US around. The press sensationalizes EVERYthing that they do. I was hospitalized with severe dehydration associated with gestational hyperemesis and was close to organ failure with my youngest child, but I don't recall it making the papers.

    A loyalist (an Anglophile) from way back, I'm still not sure that the royals need to live off the taxes of the people; with the billions they are worth, they could easily live quite comfortably (extravagantly by our standards) off the interest from their current assets. That said, I can imagine the public outcry around the world if they suggested that they were thinking of abolishing the monarchy!!

    It may sound calloused, but there are always going to be poor people. That they are poor while the royals are rich is just a fact of life. It's an unfortunate fact of life, but it is a fact. There is no guarantee that if the tax money spent on the royals' "salaries" were to be suddenly available, that the government would spend it on programs for the homeless and low-income families.

    It's not an easy question because there are so many divergent opinions. A large part of the problem lies in the need some people have to implicate themselves in the lives of people who are "famous;" they delude themselves into thinking that they "know" these people. We don't know them. We only know what we think we know. I say leave these poor rich people alone and let them have a little privacy.

    1. Nell Rose profile image90
      Nell Roseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Great answer thanks!

  15. Byonder5 profile image60
    Byonder5posted 5 years ago

    Royal baby: great news.
    Very sad about the death of the nurse who took the hoax phone call that spilt the news

  16. profile image0
    Deepes Mindposted 5 years ago

    Happy for the royal couple. Other than that, not noteworthy in my opinion and thus not my concern

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)