Council of nicaea

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (17 posts)
  1. jonnycomelately profile image82
    jonnycomelatelyposted 5 years ago

    It looks like the deliberations of the Council came about mostly because of political expediency.   They "agreed" to this and that..... they reached consensus, largely based upon the predominant beliefs of those individuals present.   Presumably those individuals represented the majority beliefs of the populace.  The Arabian world had a lot of scientific knowledge, I believe, but did Rome give much notice to that knowledge, especially if it conflicted with Rome's desire for dominance?
    So, how does modern-day religious argument rest upon what came out of Nicaea?  And how much credence can be placed upon the arguments?

    1. wilderness profile image97
      wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I don't know that the bible is based predominately on the beliefs of those present, mostly because it was very political.  Actual beliefs almost certainly took a back seat to what would be useful in the eternal quest for power.

      One of the biggest losers was apparently the gnostics of the time; those people that followed Jesus (Christians, in other words) but found that neither priests nor church were necessary to worship.  Their god was inside them, not given by a priest, and their holy books were all deleted from consideration for inclusion in the bible.  Even writings from eye witnesses to Jesus' life were eventually to be destroyed in the effort to maintain power for the church and Rome.

      So...most modern day religious arguments come from the efforts of the people at Nicaea (and Constantine), working hard to maintain and extend their power over people.  As such, they cannot be given anywhere near the credence most people give them.

      1. Zelkiiro profile image94
        Zelkiiroposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        And if the Biblical accounts of Jesus' teachings can be trusted at all, then Gnosticism is the likeliest candidate for what his teachings represented. Shed personal possessions, care not for the things of the world, always live in the present--it all points to the metaphysical being more important than the physical. Coincidentally (or not), it's a key Gnostic principle.

    2. donotfear profile image87
      donotfearposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The most significant alteration that came from this council, was changing the method of Baptism.  The apostles baptized in the name of Jesus and this was the practice until the Nicaea council.  They then changed the method of baptism to Father, Son & Holy Ghost. 

      Yes, there is a reference to this in the new testament "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"  Matthew 28:19.  But perhaps it was never meant to be changed.

    3. Ericdierker profile image45
      Ericdierkerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The important part is the Nicaean Creed. You say WHAT?1
      What they argued is small, what they agreed upon is major. I believe there were 7 councils of Nicaea. Gnosticism and Christ being the focus. They showed clearly that man after Christ's Ascension was still argumentative and sophical. Ridiculous rules were enacted. But not one Christian follower cared until she was crucified for not following it.

  2. Zelkiiro profile image94
    Zelkiiroposted 5 years ago

    The Council of Nicaea is especially hilarious as the writings of the Essenes, believed to be the direct followers of James (a.k.a. Jesus' brother a.k.a. the guy Jesus was said to put in charge of his teachings and his legacy), were thrown away right away.

    And instead, half the New Testament contains the propaganda of a Roman spy.

    1. Ericdierker profile image45
      Ericdierkerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Buddy - Nicaea was Eastern not Western.

  3. Jerami profile image69
    Jeramiposted 5 years ago

    You may have a point here!  I believe that Constantine did have a purely political agenda in the formation of
    the RCC. It is believed that he was not himself a believer until he was on his death bead, IF in fact he did at that point.  IF this and everything posted thus far in this thread is true, All that proves is that Atheist should not logically believe they can use this political version in their attempts to disprove the existence or non existence of GOD.  ALL this proves is the bible is the product of a political agenda.
    However ...  according to the bible, (approx 230 years prior to the Council of Nicaea) when John received the Revelation, an institution such as this would at some time in the near future come into power, It would, if possible, fool even the very elect.  It will be given 42 months (in prophesy) to Blaspheme.
    SOoo , “IF”  these statements concerning this council of Nicaea could be proven and accepted as true, all this would mean is that the RCC was the beast described in Rev. 13.

    1. wilderness profile image97
      wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Sounds much like the predictions of Nicodemus.  Assuming the religion grows, at some point writings WILL be collected and that action WILL be politically oriented.  Man is a political, power oriented creature and it is a simple prediction that any group assembling such a bible will use their power to extend their power.

      And like Nicodemus, the prediction fails badly on details.  It is been a little more than 42 months since the bible was compiled.

      1. Jerami profile image69
        Jeramiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        As far as time passing in biblical prophesy goes, it is plain to see that 42 months in prophesy is not the same amount of time as our calandar.   For instance ,,,  in 538 BC  Gabriel is said to have told daniel that in 62 weeks the Messiah will be killed.  Approx 538 years later Jesus was killed.    SOoo as far as biblical prophesy is concerned ?  568 of our years would be equal to approx. 62 prophetic weeks. 

        SOo if this concept were explored,  ???

        1. wilderness profile image97
          wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          So Gabriel was wrong, just as John was.  Or maybe Daniel misunderstood, or changed the number to something more palatable to him. 

          Changing the words of the bible to mean something other than what was recorded always seems a little wrong somehow.  Particularly when dealing with such as these prophecies, it seems just a method to retain the "truth" of the prophecy rather than accept that it was wrong to start with.  Changing the words just creates the impression of truth without ever changing the reality that it was wrong to start with.

          1. Mark Knowles profile image60
            Mark Knowlesposted 5 years agoin reply to this

            But - unless you change the words to mean something else, the logical conclusion is that it is all rubbish. Hence 2,000 years of arguing over what the words should say instead of what they actually say. Jerami is good at this game. wink

            1. wilderness profile image97
              wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

              Well, yes.  But as we know without doubt that it isn't rubbish, we must find a way to rationalize.  Changing the meaning of words is easier than changing history.  Eventually, I suppose, the words themselves will be changed to match the meaning.

              1. jonnycomelately profile image82
                jonnycomelatelyposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                ....Change the word to match the meaning.....   Is not the purpose of a word to convey a meaning?  We use words to communicate something that occurs in our mind.

                Jerami, Mark, Wilderness, myself.... we each have a difference precept in our minds and want to convey to the others what IS in our minds.   There seems to be the objective of coming to a relaxed state in my mind...... by convincing others of my precepts, getting them to accept, agree, then I can relax because I no longer feel threatened about what is in my mind.

                Whether what I have in my mind is categorically true and factual is not really important.  It's just getting accepted which makes me relax.  There is always a personal agenda.

                Applying what I have said to all of your (very much respected) posts here might give you some insights.

                1. wilderness profile image97
                  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                  There can be many objectives in the choice of a particular word.  To create anger, fear or other emotion in the listener.  To convince some else of a particular viewpoint.  To soothe the speaker and reinforce personal beliefs (as in the case of changing the meaning of biblical text).  To convince someone a lie is true.

                  There are many, many objectives in both speech in general and in the choice of specific words.  It would be a wonderful world if what you said was always true, but it isn't.

  4. Disappearinghead profile image74
    Disappearingheadposted 5 years ago

    I felt I ought to look this up on Wikipedia before commenting here as I had previously assumed that the Council of Nicea was concerned with agreeing which books were in and which were not to be in the bible. I was wrong.

    According to Wikipedia the discussions covered:
    Arianism, the nature of Christ, celebration of Passover (Easter), ordination of eunuchs, prohibition of kneeling on Sundays and from Easter to Pentecost, validity of baptism by heretics, lapsed Christians, sundry other matters.

    To me these all seem to be pretty minor issues regarding impact on Christian doctrine with the exception of the nature of Jesus which appears to have been the dominant issue. Two Arians believed Jesus was created by God, whilst the other 300 or so believe he was of the same essence as God. I guess this latter idea led to the Trinity doctrine which is hotly debated even today.

    Does it really matter? Well if you are a fundamentalist Christian who believes that believing the wrong doctrine can result in being sent to hell, then yes. Otherwise it's just an argument over semantics.

  5. Nicholas Fiorito profile image70
    Nicholas Fioritoposted 5 years ago

    The Council of Nicea was certainly political in its aim.  Constantine became interested in Christianity as a tool to further empire, and then all his conversion story and such proceeded backwards from there.

    Gnosticism was certainly the loser in the council, however, I don't think Gnostics were simply ascetics and more enlightened, spiritual searchers.  They likely had house-churches and congregations much like their "orthodox" counterparts (they weren't termed that yet, of course, but anyways...).  They also had great teachers, leaders, and members of the community.  Valentinus is probably the best known.  He was a teacher of philosophy and quite well-versed in Platonic theory.

    I think the debate ultimately came down to this -- which would be more politically expedient?: 1) a doctrine that largely challenges the status quo -- Gnosticism claims corporeal reality was created and is ruled over by an imperfect creator, and that the established spiritual/ontological hierarchies are oppressive, and thus one can be liberated through gnosis with the truth of Christ (likely experienced personally and through the community of faith), or 2) corporeal reality, the body, and the physical Earth is all created by a good God, redeemed by Christ, and that goodness and holiness is available, but mediated through the power structure of the Church on Earth.

    While I think the former could be used and twisted to serve the purposes of warmongering, empire, and all the other lovely things Christianity has committed in the past 2000 years, the latter is certainly much easier to work with.  The former also has plenty of potential to give rise to reaction against oppression and worldly corruption.  The latter allows for much more control over "salvation."


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)