There are tons of evidence that the Most High, Almighty Creator God indeed exists. So come on (atheists and agnostics) and covert your delusion into a faithful return to Christ and the life everlasting....
Don't be surprised if a few of the atheists and agnostics here "have a go"!
No he doesn't! Is that "having a go"?
I'm sure you will have a (real) go, (at the newcomer)!
Why would I have a go at someone who signed up here specifically to preach his message of hate and division? When here you are to welcome him.
Is that your feminine side, or your reasoning logical side speaking right now?
Let God and His only Son (Jesus Christ) pacify your delusional sentiments into a creative whole that benefits all.
what is an atheist's delusional sentiments?
Atheist's delusional sentiments is someone who questions everything and has the ability to think for themselves based on evidence. It's also someone who does NOT believe in the story of how the world was created in 6 days and how God made man from the dust of the earth, deceived by a woman over a fruit and encounters an evil serpent. Then there's a flood that kills the earth's population because they were evil, an ark to save a family and each species of animals. Oh wait! That's all a rip off from the ancient Babylonian's view of creation and from an earlier Sumerian story called The Epic of Gigamesh!
Just on a sidenote, alot of Christians don't believe this (the whole 6 day creation, etc.)That's based on a literal conservative Christian view only. There are about as many different Christian views on creation, the flood, etc. as there are Christians.
I'm sue that doesn't help matters much!
There is only ONE true story, and that's God's story.
Christians can make as many interpretations as they like, in the meantime.
Non-believers don't seem to care anyway.
They have made their choice to put all bets on some natural phenomenon, like the Big Bang.
Why do you ask?
If my opinion is one of "countless other believers", it is meaningless to anyone else.
And the first personal attack. Well done - you have just reminded me why your religion causes so many fights.
So where's all this evidence that points to the existence of this imaginary Bronze Age sky daddy?
Here's my advice, gather up all this so called "evidence", get it peer reviewed and go collect your Nobel Prize! For some bozo to claim god exists because he or she simply says so, doesn't cut it.
Nowhere in the Bible is God referred to in this way. It's an atheist's fabrication!
Here's my advice right back. Even if all this were done for you, you would refuse to believe.
Jesus showed Himself to BE who he claimed to be, yet many, many people (read, religious people) rejected him. Asking for, PROOF, no less. So, your position on faith is nothing new!
But, I'm sure you already knew that.
Can existence exist? Does not exist have to be an objective observation with finality of least to this moment? (Or the moment of reading and pondering pondering and determining it as so, thus a worth is assigned)
That would be rational thought seeking proof of occurring would it not? Existence is experiential, independent of human thought or consciousness, and a present occurrence. Would one not have to offer proof of existence before proof of 'exist'?
Fiction is a story of the mind dealing with unreal events having occurred. It is a false 'truth' or untrue. It is a determinate worth seeking a value under false pretenses. The value arrives from someone seeking to exchange worth for worth with a means of exchange with another. If there is not any worth determined by one party of least then there simply is not any value.
However for that value sought there must be consideration and worth is assessed. Does not of least the hypothetical value of the exchange of one's worth with the worth of another need consideration? Faith and trust need not occur only acceptance and recognition of possibility with factors of probability.
Without value an exchange does not occur. Seeking value will occur and that at times is called 'haggling' or negotiating. There of least is 'questionable' interjected offering doubt. Doubt has not loyalty. Doubt is doubt. For the exchange to occur then a value must be determined. A determinate value.
Non-fiction is firstly writing and it is about real events and/or facts. This thread for instance is written. It is non-fiction since it did occur and is documented as occurring. It is factual as written. Therefore, with regard to exist and existence this thread most certainly does exist. There are objective truths and subjective truths.
They are undeniable of least until the thread no longer is published publicly and then privately is another matter. Is human memory, capacity of human memory as recall, and the testimonial value of that recall then at question as being private? Does not plausible now enter especially with regard to deniability?
So, what does that share with any of us of 'existence' regarding this thread? Does this thread have or meet the defined criteria for 'existence'? I dun'no . . . however it was fun pondering
In reference to the OP, if you claim there is a lot of evidence, you will probably receive only disrespect and cause ridicule for the beliefs you are attempting to promote if you do not present any evidence following the statement.
Oh, God exists alright. All fictional concepts exist in the minds of those who created them.
Cool. Let me rephrase this to the way it really is.
"Oh, God exists alright. He exists in the hearts of those who have accepted Him."
I like that much better!
Not really. If something exists in your heart other than your heart and blood you are in a rather bit of trouble.
Shush! It's called "jargon" and you're not allowed to question it. You know, where word meanings are all changed to make it sound neat - "day" means "million years or whatever else I want" and "world" means "the valley Noah lived in". Things like that.
Technically, those meaning confusions are caused by inadequate knowledge of the ancient Hebrew languages and resulting in vague translations highly dependent upon context (which is why we have so many translations which sound nothing like each other.) I studied ancient Hebrew. It's a pain to translate and can be translated so many ways that you almost have no clue what it's really saying.
I see you are trying to get to the "blood pump" of the matter.
Keep going, and you are sure to get there.
Rad man is not "trying" at all. He did it.! You're the one that's trying. You're just trying to pump "BS" into the matter.
As opposed to this non-hubber God spam which is trying to... I don't know. Equate God to a dodgy weight loss product? Something you just drive buy and fling at people's faces in the hope it will stick?
Not an approach, IMHO, that is owed much respect. At least the Jehovah's Witnesses go the trouble of walking over and ringing my doorbell. I'll give them that much.
So, you NEVER use the term "heart"? (In any other context besides the physical "blood pump").
by Thom Carnes 11 years ago
A few weeks ago I asked what I thought was quite a serious, searching question about the existence of God, and was rather disappointed when it got a very limited response. (This could have been because we were all wrestling this other equally important issues at the time.)Peter Lopez made a valiant...
by PhoenixV 4 years ago
Can You Prove God Exists?What are your arguments for an existing God?
by preacherdon 9 years ago
There are many who are atheist and agnostic because they either don't know or don't believe God exists. Creation tells us that God exists but atheist explain Him away with evolution and Big Bangs. So, my question is, how can God prove Himself to the point where there would be no doubt? The Book of...
by Michael Ward 8 years ago
What Would You Do If You Were Faced With Completely Irrefutable Evidence That There Was No God?And I mean completely. As irrefutable as 1+1=2. I asked my friend about this and he had a mini-breakdown so I thought I'd ask you guys. Still not certain if I'm just unsatisfied with his answer or I'm...
by wordscribe41 11 years ago
The following post is in response to a statement made by another hubber and the many posts I've read using logical fallacies:"the burden of proof" is NOT on the believers. There is no burden to prove He exists because it is by FAITH that we believe. It is by faith we called on to believe....
by Thinkaboutit77 12 years ago
God has "shewed himself alive ....by many infallible proofs" (Acts 1:3). If you'd like the FREE Power Point slide showing 5 infallible proofs that the true God exists then just email me and I'll gladly send it out.
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|