How do Christians explain the many various evolutionary changes that have taken place in humankind.
There is no denying that a direct chain (minus a few "links") of ever advancing humanoids leading up to modern man, so how can that fit into the Biblical view?
The answer to that question has to be given in two steps. First, you have to identify which type of evolution you are referring to. If you mean micro evolution (change within a species), the answer is easy.
God designed changes with in the human genome. He intended for red hair and blond, brown and gray. Haven't you heard the song, "Red and Yellow, Black and White. . . They are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world." No matter if you are big small, fat or tall, we are all still humans. Micro evolution is something that God made because He loves variety.
If you are talking about Macro evolution (Change between species), the answer is even more easy. There has never been any evidence of humans coming from anything but a human parent. There is simply never been any Macro evolution.
Neanderthal was not a lesser link. His brain case is larger than ours. He is just human with big brow ridges. Incidentally, did you know that brow ridges continue to protrude with age. Neanderthal was an old guy with a big brain.
As far as the other "links" that have been complete hoaxes or have disappeared with no evidence left, they were not human.
Evolutionists need to explain why they will not even consider a fair academic debate on why there is certainly as much evidence against Macro Evolution as there is for it. Ever seen the documentary "Expelled"? I would love to see you explain that.
@PastorAndrew: I was speaking of Macro, as evidenced by my speaking ape evolving into man.
As for Neanderthal man; an old man with a large brain, really? First of all there is very little difference in the size of any two humans brains (there is little need evolutionirly speaking, since brains size doesnt seem to correlate with intelligence), so what would be the cause of such an abnormaly large brain?
And what of the differences in bone mass? Or what of bone size? Posture? Longer, more apelike arm?
So, your saying that he was a abnormaly large, muscular, long limbed, broad boned, big brained, old man?
As for expelled, I have seen it; I will comment on it when I have gotten a chance to look.
I don't know, but I'm sure all the answers your going to get from christians are answers to justify their beliefs and not actual facts, we have science to thank for pretty much everything we have in this day and age, no more reason to believe in talking snakes, the virgin birth, a man living inside a whale and water turning into wine=)
by CH Elijah Sadaphal 2 years ago
Recently, while reading The Magic of Reality (2012) by Richard Dawkins, I came upon this interesting proclamation in the chapter titled, “Why Do Bad Things Happen?”:"Bad things happen because things happen. Whether they are bad or good from our point of view doesn’t influence how likely...
by Julie Grimes 7 years ago
With some recent archaeological discoveries in India, and in South Africa has Darwin's evolution clouded our judgment about the creation of mankind? That's the question I would like to pose to all of you this morning before I scurry off to work.Why I am asking this question is because it is...
by thetruthhurts2009 8 years ago
Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy. If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to...
by CJ Simonelli 4 years ago
All of the so-called "evidences" for evolution theory are essentially "fluff" evidences that reveal NOTHING about the origins of life. To illustrate, let's say I falsely asserted that a particular woman had once been a boy during childhood. I then discovered and presented...
by Richard Parr 6 years ago
“Evolutionary theory is not a slam-dunk. It is an exercise in storytelling that masquerades as a scientific theory” [William A. Dembski]In his article 'Questions Evolutionists Would Rather Dodge', Dr Dembski asks five questions.I present only the first one here. What is the evolutionists...
by Marcy Goodfleisch 13 months ago
Which is true - Creationism or Evolution? Can both be right?It seems there are still arguments about whether the world was 'created' or whether it 'evolved.' What do you believe? Can you also accept the alternative view?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|