This is the religion of evolution. If you are a Christian find yourself debating an evolutionary atheist you will find all their tactics here, just compare this to everything mark says and you'll get a laugh.
Evolutionary thinking did not start with Darwin, it started with Aristotle, who believed some races were lest evolved than others, so idea of racism started long before we realize. But it was Darwin who had a reason to want to disprove God. After marrying his first cousin, he had a daughter who died tragically from illness at the age of 10 or 12, and for then on Darwin became severely depressed, he believed that since he felt this bad God can't be real(sound familiar)so he theorizes how world could be created without a creator.
That over time pond scum gave birth to life and evolved in to everything we see around us today, the problem was it never happened. But why do people believe it did?
Let an atheist answer “[I suppose the reason] we all jumped at the Origin [Origin of Species] was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores.” Sir Julian Huxley. Accountability that what it all comes down to. Fear of Final Judgment and the bible predicted as much in Romans 1:20-27 For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God. 21 Yes, they knew God, but they wouldn’t worship him as God or even give him thanks. And they began to think up foolish ideas of what God was like. As a result, their minds became dark and confused. 22 Claiming to be wise, they instead became utter fools. 23 And instead of worshiping the glorious, ever-living God, they worshiped idols made to look like mere people and birds and animals and reptiles. 24 So God abandoned them to do whatever shameful things their hearts desired. As a result, they did vile and degrading things with each other’s bodies. 25 They traded the truth about God for a lie. So they worshiped and served the things God created instead of the Creator himself, who is worthy of eternal praise! Amen. 26 That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. 27 And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved. But why are so true sure it’s true? 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 10 He will use every kind of evil deception to fool those on their way to destruction, because they refuse to love and accept the truth that would save them. 11 So God will cause them to be greatly deceived, and they will believe these lies. 12 Then they will be condemned for enjoying evil rather than believing the truth.
In order to keep the lie going they’ve come with scams from Piltdown Man to misleading drawings to Ida(whatever happened to fool me once). As for added proof evolution is a lie. Since the indoctrination of our kids in schools with evolution, test scores have gone down and violence has gone up (Kip Kinkle, Columbine shooters all avid evolutionary thinkers).
Evolution is a Religion!
Pope- Charles Darwin
Pastor- Richard Dawkins
Future plans- Karl Marx
Members- Haters of God, lovers of sin
Holey Text-The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. The God Delusion and God is not Great. Any new myth evolutionary came up with other than a creator.
gods- satan, Father Time” Time is the god of evolutionists. The evolutionists' claim their time-god is very slow but infinitely powerful. The time-god is credited with the ability to accomplish anything and everything given enough time. It simply takes the time-god millions or billions of years to accomplish it. Scientifically impossible events are credited to the time-god. Evolutionists keep their time-god close at hand where they can watch their god's hands move around slowly, slowly, slowly trying to evolve new species but never succeeding.” and Materialistic naturalistic junk(FSM)
Faith Creed- Even though we have no concrete proof the evolution(macro ,cosmic, Stellar and planetary Organic) is real we must believe at all cost, because wants to believe in a designer who will judge us for are sins. Btw Biological Evolution is a fancy spin on mutations and conjugation compare the two you know I’m right!
Actions-Always be sarcastic never think you are wrong. Whenever a creationist shows us proof, deny and unleash hell on their character and use big font, and smiley’s and by all means completely ignore the argument. Insult their intelligence, tell them read a book. Never debate on your own travel in packs. When ask about in other forms of evolution, call them names and insult their intelligence tell them to read a book. Never question the "holey" theory no matter how ridiculous we sound.(0+0=1). Show no respect after all we are just animals. When anyone brings up Hitler and all the murder and racism caused by evolutionist deny and deflect attention to something Christians did "wrong". Even evidence doesn’t fit ignore the evidence and stick with the lie. When all else fails mock the Bible that will anger Christians and will show they are not perfect (even though no true Christian will claim to be perfect.) Our sources are talk origins.com, Dawkins and every other atheistic site. Stick your fingers in our ears and yell “there is no God,” to drown out all common sense. Whenever possible use words like "which god?" “sky daddy“, “imaginary sky friend,” “old book,” “Jebus” “Babble” “religious” “bigot” “homophobic” put God in lower case, Bring up old refuted bible “contradictions” deny all the facts in favor of Jesus the biblical account of he life and the 500 eyewitnesses and the fact that even other atheist acknowledge his existence.
Evolution is the religion of death disease and racism that offers nothing, but the bondage to sin (Now while you google bible slavery verses and look up a counter "arguments".)
So except them to defend their beliefs like the many other religion except evolutionist tend to be more violent(hilter, stalin, poi, eugenics labs etc.) but unlike the others they try to call their religion “science“, and you know their tactics. Darwinist seem to think variations, genetic recombination, adaptations, mutations conjugation within a kind + TIME god= speck to everything, but that's simply impossible. "The amount of information in the 3 billion base pairs in the DNA in every human cell has been estimated to be equivalent to that in 1,000 books of encyclopedia size. If humans were 'only' 4% different this still amounts to 120 million base pairs, equivalent to approximately 12 million words, or 40 large books of information. This is surely an impossible barrier for mutations (random changes) to cross" Dr. Don Batten, Ph.D.
The biggest fallacies in the evolutionary atheist argument the are a philosophy pseudo scientific religion with no base they have no logical answer for how it all began, where did the information came from, but without a superior answer to that they’ll still proclaim there is no God. It’s a dizzying intellect.
I have no problem with variations, genetic recombination, adaptations, transduction, mutations, transformation, vital enzyme exchange through plasmids, conjugation and natural selection within a kind, it’s biblical and a proven fact, but when you Darwinist try to take leap of faith with “Give it enough time you turn anything to anything look at these bones” that where it stops being science and becomes a pseudoscientific religion. and you even can't tell how it all began and where the information came from. I‘ll stick with God and His word.
You definitely will be nominated on the anti-evolution hall of fame, and are likely to become a champion
Evolution's belong the anti Science Hall of Shame! Fool me once. How many more times will you be deceived of the evolution lie or did you miss the retraction of Ida as the missing link? .Let me guess and your pack didn't even read it all. Atheists ignoring facts? NEVER!
Evolution is a scientific theory, not a religion, and most people who believe in evolution also believe in God. Even a lot of more fundamentalist born-again Christians accept evolution as a reasonable scientific explanation for how all life got to be the way it is now. They believe that God created and uses evolution.
Charles Darwin was himself an agnostic who bore no hostility to religion in general or Christianity in particular, and he refused to advocate atheism. "On the Origin of the Species" was heavily influenced by the Christian theodicy espoused by William Paley, particularly in his own work "Natural Theology." It also received the support of many of Darwin's Christian contemporaries.
To claim that evolution is irreconcilable with Christianity is to express ignorance of both.
That where you're wrong!
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creatio … lution.asp
lol - I can smell the fear through the computer screen. And speaking of pictures - did you get my last PM?
Mark? I am curious
What is it that you think we believers are afraid of in making the choice to believe?
Death? But if death is final where is the impending danger that would make one be afraid of that?
Uhm, is the fear you are tLking about coming from all of us believers becoming awe struck when man/science finally fills in all the gaps and declares them to the world?
Uhm, news flash, this hasn't happened, and I am so sorry to tell you this, it will not happen.
How do I know this?
The mathematical probability that all of creation, the universe and all that is contained inside it, all the matter etc. , the probability that all that came to be as a matter of chance is non-existant. There is no probability about it.
It is mathematically impossible for it to have happened the way science has theorized it has.
Seven Requirements to Sustain Life:
Requirement 1: Neutron Mass ≈ Proton Mass
Requirement 2: Proton Charge = Electron Charge
Requirement 3: Strong Nuclear Force
Requirement 4: Epsilon Constant ≈ Gravitational Fine Structure
Requirement 5: Primordial Escape Velocity = Primordial Expansion Velocity
Requirement 6: The Cosmological Constant = 0
Requirement 7: Weak Nuclear Force
What Are the Probabilities?
Universe Analyzer, a software program popular on engineering campuses a few years back, helped in calculating the mathematical probability of an un-designed universe meeting the seven requirements for the existence of life. Some of the information in this article was condensed and summarized from this program.
This software demonstrated how remote the probabilities were for all of these requirements to be met purely by random chance. One demonstration featured a total of 2,129 separate universe models. These models give a realistic picture of what the chances would be, given various requirements being met by random chance. Below is the list as to how many requirements were met.
• Models meeting 1 of the 7 requirements—404
• Models meeting 2 of the 7 requirements—8
• Models meeting 3 of the 7 requirements—0
• Models meeting 4 of the 7 requirements—0
• Models meeting 5 of the 7 requirements—0
• Models meeting 6 of the 7 requirements—0
• Models meeting 7 of the 7 requirements—0
Notice that of the 2,129 separate universe models, only 404 met at least one requirement by random chance. (The only requirements for which the random number generation program were able to qualify were requirements 1, 3, 4 and 7.)
Of the 2,129 models, only eight met two of the necessary requirements. Not a single model was able to meet three or more. The program user could alter the parameters to differ from the forces and constants found in the universe and score a higher probability than the demonstration covered. The point is this: Given the constants, forces and other parameters in the known universe, the probability of these seven requirements being met by chance would be nil for millions upon millions of separate models conducted continually across time!
A few decades ago, Harlow Shapley, a noted astronomer, made an interesting admission that still defines the predicament that evolutionists have always faced: “We appear, therefore, to be rather helpless with regard to explaining the origin of the universe. But once it is set going, we can do a little better at interpretation” (The Evolution of Life, Vol. 1).
Once evolution is allowed the assumption of an orderly universe favorable for life, they “do a little better” in explaining how life might have evolved. However, the origin of such a universe can never be assumed—it simply could not have occurred without detailed, creative forethought.
And with this post, I am going now from this forum topic as well, in fact all the forum topics as my son needs to picked up from school.
Yep, I did receive your email. Sorry, I am always slow answering, bet you noticed it already
Misha! you changed your picture again how come?
I can't keep the other one up too long, Mark gets very upset
I do put it up now and again for a while though, just to tease him a bit
Mark does? Oh Mark why do you get upset? and it looks like Mark has a stalker.
I don't fight with others thank you. I actually listen with an open mind.
by A Troubled Man 7 years ago
There is no dispute on evolution.It's one of the best understood, thoroughly tested scientific facts ever.No aspect of it at all is based on anything but sound, evidence-based, science.The current Pope accepts evolution, the previous Pope did, the one before him did. The current Bishop of...
by thetruthhurts2009 11 years ago
Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy. If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to...
by John Sarkis 5 years ago
What do Evolutionists really mean by "Intelligent Design?"For example: if you believe in Einstein's "Big Bang Theory" - then wouldn't the universe/cosmos had to be "Intelligent" enough in order to bring itself into existence? I've oftentimes heard...
by Tricia Mason 8 years ago
Hello:)I have had discussions, on this site and elsewhere, with a number of Creationists.For those who have not been involved in such discussion, I should clarify a few things:I do not think that the Bible is the word of God.I do not believe that the Bible describe's our origins.I accept...
by Richard Parr 9 years ago
“Evolutionary theory is not a slam-dunk. It is an exercise in storytelling that masquerades as a scientific theory” [William A. Dembski]In his article 'Questions Evolutionists Would Rather Dodge', Dr Dembski asks five questions.I present only the first one here. What is the evolutionists response...
by Marcy Goodfleisch 3 years ago
Which is true - Creationism or Evolution? Can both be right?It seems there are still arguments about whether the world was 'created' or whether it 'evolved.' What do you believe? Can you also accept the alternative view?
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|