Can Any creationists provide any real world evidence for creationism, without using their holy book?
I am just curious for any creationists, what is your proof and reasoning for what you believe? Obviously your holy book or own personal experiences, but can any of you provide any geographic, mathmatical, scientific, historical, or even logical evidence for why you believe in creationism. No holy book, no personal relationship or feelings, just straight up facts.
Thank you I am doing this for research.
This is a challenge for me because the bible has all the answers , but I still can attempt the question,
Just as a project say the making of a robot , what would it take, to start materials , the robot put together would function say as a human in a mechanical way,
Head, arms, legs, brain box, power source,
How are we made, head, arms, legs, brain, power to function, power to regenerate, power to see , power
to store infomation, power to reproduce another human.
Power to heal cells rapidly, power to express emotions ,
What is one of the greatest proofs for me is about the creation of the human body it has the same amount
of bones , in the man as in the woman.
The skeleton of an adult human consists of 206 bones. It is composed of 270 bones at birth, which decreases to 206 bones by adulthood after some bones have fused together. It consists of 80 bones in the axial skeleton (28 in skull and 52 in torso) and 126 bones in the appendicular skeleton (32 x 2 in upper extremities including both arms and 31 x 2 in lower extremities including both legs). Many small and often variable bones, such as some sesamoid bones, are not included in this count
The point here it is exact eveytime , not 300 bones , or 600, or 10 ,20, only because of birth defects we know this would make a change.
But comparison to the robot parts change up, but ours do not .
Most Doctors count on it in their profession.
Also consider organ count , each number , not five kidneys but exactly 2.
Proof that he is a God of order.
1Co 14:33 For God is a God not of disorder but of peace.
This is a great witness of his existence , because if we can believe a robot did not create it self , why can God not create us , as said from dust to clay, from clay the breath of his power house life.
Alright, so in yours it is the pattern of human beings that provides your believe? The complexity requires a creator thing? However what about people born with extra organs, some doomed to die, is that a flook or what?
Just as we can believe that the robot did not create itself, we can also believe that God did not create HIMSELF. So who created God?
Getit, where is the beginning and end of a perfect circle ?
Is accepted. He has no beginning or no end we do.
I admit i have a atheist biast here but i have to say getitrite has a valid point there
The point is it does matter to you , but criticism and questions that suit your own views does not make them valid
But the truth will always stand , not by your demands , but when God decides. He does not die , we live because he lives.
Look I am inherently curious. I was pretty christian for a long time, as i got older i fell out of my faith and then realized it doesnt make sense to me. My finacee and her family are very christian and i just wonder how people can believe this
Please disregard the link and comment. I feel sheepish discovering that it was a hoax. I apologize for any of your wasted time due to it.
I know you said without using holy book
but as a Muslim, the Quran told us these things about 1400 years ago by unlettered man
80% of what he said have proofed
20% are unknown
then I assume the creationism is true based on 80% true and 20% unknown
I will admit I did not look at every one of those, i merelt skimmed but I will go through later. However from what ive seen most of these are a stretch at best, and simply putting it merely coincidental with somr just sounding like gibberish.
Make sure to research various sources, not just the one - I fell for a few tricks before, and I do a bit more research nowadays, on websites that are created to expose false claims as they arise.
I saw a video of a Chicago Tribune writer researching God proof. I don't recall the name but it was very intrigueing. One part showed a rotifer-microscopic critter-it has a body part that resembles a drive shaft. Cars were made before this was known.
Creationism fits the available facts in nature better than does evolution. You look at the complexity of nature and know that it must have a creator. Evolution lacks a scientific basics and is supported by circular reasoning. The belief in evolution requires blind allegiance to a secular faith. It defies some of the basic laws of nature. I.e. Things tend to go from order to disorder not the other way around. This breaks the 2nd law of thermodynamics, that a system tends to go to equilibrium over time, not to increasing order and complexity.
You literally just spouted every creationist cliche.
What makes you think nature cant?
Then something as complex as god needs a creator.
There is sufficent evidence, your belief requires blind faith.
And the 2nd law doesnt work...like ev
If God is supernatural, wouldn't He defy natural law? As for evolution, did male and female organisms evolve together or separately? Or what good would an eye be in the supposed million years that it took to evolve?
It adapts to situations, male and female originally started out as both a-sexual organisms. Do i know all the answers, no, because i am in the process of learning it. And god if super natural why cant he prove himself and the eye will be my nxt cmnt
What if God doesn't want to prove Himself? What if He's looking for faith? Not a blind faith but a measure of faith that comes from a love for Him?
However in response to god and faith,why create beings that he knows require more than bling faith from a contradictory book, fo you believe in allah, same difference. Do you believe in greek gods, same differenece. Faith is not a reason to believe.
I like your comment wba, because we need him, he has the answers , the cures, the future of continued life, he is not intimidated by humans who do not accept him in any form
Because he keeps living while our days are not sure.
Why is your all knowing all powerful god need his ego stroked, why is the "proof" always the same shtick over and over. Faith, has to be creation, too complex.
Why can't you guys ever have validity, a fossil out of place for example?
This is fantastic in explaining God as creator:
http://dailycurrant.com/2013/02/01/mess … -sequence/
I have also been fascinated by the 'code' hidden in the unending stream of numbers in pi. Fibbonacci's sequence is also fascinating when considering perfection. All of these things are solid science based clues to God's existence. Because the odds of perfect in random are quite slim. Hope this helps.
I would like to add that although I am fascinated by science it is not the reason I believe. I have blind faith and because of such I have had many experiences to validate my blind faith in God. I mention science because that's what you requested.
I think you get the best answer from God, when you go to see him, after your heart stops beating, you poop your last poop, and breath your last breathe. Isn't life and death the best example?
Silly question. Focus on helping and loving others, not asking questions, you know you aren't eve going to bother to understand.
Your not ready for an answer. Answers like these will change your life.
Why focus on fighting your way into a worm hole, just to upset good people.
I love helping, if i had more time I'd volunteer more. However that is not the question at hand, i understand perfectly fine, your guys logic just speaks nocoherent sensr to me.
Did you go to my link? It talks about a message found at Harvard University in the human genome coded in aramaic. It said "Hello my children, this is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world"
I think it's first important to know and understand what you're looking for. We're talking about something that was specifically described as being spiritual, and not physical. So it would be illogical to look for physical evidence.
So what would evidence of creation, or should we say deliberate creation, look like? What are we looking for? Manual manipulation of natural processes? If God is the creator of the natural world, why would He then need to manipulate the natural processes of His own creation to realize what He wills? Are we looking for magic? What would magic look like in physical evidence? Just a gap in understanding where there's no natural/physical explanation for how something changed from one state to another? Would that not just be seen as a gap in understanding that we don't yet understand? There's plenty of gaps.
I know you specified "no holy book", but I think it's relevant. I have a hub I invite you to read that shows that the creation account is scientifically accurate. That would be about those closest you could come to having "proof".
Without that I'd say DNA is the best evidence. To find out we actually have coded information embedded in our cells, information that is passed on and then used to construct future generations of complex organisms, is a pretty good indicator for intelligent intent being involved.
But a natural world that by all appearances seems to have formed itself is exactly what we should expect to see if the God described in the bible is real. A natural world that 'banged' forth from a single point and became all of this. And all of this being the result of what was already present there in that singularity where it all began. The values of the natural laws were set, the behaviors of matter and energy already set, and that resulted in all of this, including intelligent self-aware beings on at least one planet.
Personally I don't find it much of an argument. It should be obvious that this was all deliberately intended and not just some big cosmic accident. I'll end with a personal favorite quote from someone I admire, the creator of South Park ...
"Out of all the ridiculous religion stories — which are greatly, wonderfully ridiculous — the silliest one I’ve ever heard is, ‘Yeah, there’s this big, giant universe and it’s expanding and it’s all going to collapse on itself and we’re all just here, just because… That to me, is the most ridiculous explanation ever." - Trey Parker
Regarding the quote, he believes like nothing and chooses to ignore it. Everything else, you would think there would be evidence in thr physical relm as consequences of the spiritual.
The evidence IS the physical. Look, you can't see the mind, can you? You can't see the will that drives people to do the things they do. Not all things that exist can be detected. So, logically, if anything's undetectable, there's probably more.
Isn't that like asking a scientist to explain things in the world without referring to a scientific theory? Both take faith. All scientific theories have flaws. Some more than others.
by Jake Brannen 3 years ago
Creationism vs. Evolution: Why?Why does there appear to be such a degree of animosity between people who believe the natural world is a product of intelligent design by an omnipotent creator, and people who believe it is the product of an evolutionary process that continues to shape the natural...
by Sean Thomas Gartland 6 years ago
If you have any evidence please present it.
by toobsucker 6 years ago
Darwinian evolution (atheistic evolution) requires 100% of all biological systems to be subject to the mechanisms proposed for evolutionary change, yet the conserved elements are not subject to any of the evolutionary mechanisms. A theory that predicts 100% system change must demonstrate 100% of...
by Csanad 6 years ago
Should BOTH Evolution AND Creation should be thought in public schools?I think yes. Evolutionists state that Creationists brainwash children by not allowing other things to be studied by children. However Evolutionists fall into the same trap; they only allow Evolution and nothing else. I think...
by Jacqui 5 years ago
Is it possible to believe in both Creation and Microevolution?A comment on another question sparked this. Those who believe in Creation often scoff at the idea of Evolution eg we can't be descended from Apes etc..Adam and Eve etc. Yet, someone answered with the idea that they believed in...
by cooldad 7 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/scien … wanted=allNew fossils were found in South Africa which may help further explain human evolution. The fossils apparently show combinations of apelike and human combinations.Any thoughts?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|