Hi friends
I would like my friends to calculate the figure of Meccans killed in war with Muhammad- the Prince of Peace, during the life time of Muhammad. It will make a civilized comparison for humanity, I think.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
zzzzz....do not give yourself a reason to think you're under attack. general rule in peace.
Don't you mean you want to know how many people Muhammad senselessly slaughtered when he conquered Mecca?
Hi friend Q
You will be surprised to know; none; not a drop of blood was shed, and the hearts of the Meccans got convinced,converted and opened widely; as prophesied earlier; very peacefully indeed.
It is a marvelous peaceful chapter of history; though misunderstood generally.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Yes, it would be have been surprising if your fantasy had any truth to it. Unfortunately, Muhammad was a murderous despot and conquered Mecca, murdering everyone who got in his way.
To continue fabricating your religious history only serves to make you less convincing and credible, if that were possible.
Have you not read any of the historical accounts?
Battle of Badr:
14 Muslims killed
70 Meccans killed, 43-70 captured
Battle of Uhud
70 Muslims killed
44-45 Meccans killed
Battle of the Trench
Muslim casualties light, heavy Meccan losses.
Right after that was the Siege of the Banu Qurayza where the Muslims decided that the men should be killed and women and children enslaved.
After that in 630, Muhammad marched on Mecca with a force said to number more than ten thousand men, and with minimal casualties, Muhammad took control of Mecca.
He declared an amnesty for past offenses, except for ten men and women who had mocked and made fun of him in songs and verses. Some of these were later pardoned
So yeah, a lot of people were killed on the way to and going into Mecca.
I know you'll ask for proof, so try...
Ali, Abdullah Yusuf (1987). The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation & Commentary
Armstrong, Karen (1992). Muhmmad: Biography of the Prophet
Crone, Patricia (1987). Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam
Hodgson, Marshall (1974). The Venture of Islam: The Classical Age of Islam
Lings, Martin (1983). Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources
Nicolle, David (1993). Armies of the Muslim Conquest
Ramadan, Tariq (2007). In the Footsteps of the Prophet
Watt, W. Montgomery (1956). Muhammad at Medina
it doesn't matter Sabre....
He will deny and espouse the opposing view like a good lil Muslim. He even thinks the Madhi is going to come in peace. LOl Hahahahaha
That is hysterical.
Actually he thinks his Madhi has come already.... heretical and uneducated in his own religion. There would be no Jews or Christians, nor would there be unbelievers still upon the world.
The entire world would be under Islam and Shari'a had the Madhi come. (or so the story goes.)
But he insists...
I know Christianity has had a long and bloody history.
I don't embrace that, but I don't deny it either.
True I wasn't physically around for the Crusades, Inquisition, witch hunts etc., but I believe they happened.
As far as I know from what I have read, Jesus didn't lead any attacks on caravans or cities.
Christianity acknowledges the crusades as a shameful period in history, along with the inquisitions etc. One never hears Islam apologise for their murderous history though.
Hi friend Disappearinghead
The concern of the Ahmadiyya peaceful Muslims is the present era. The problems faced by humanity cannot be resolved in history. Every religion and nation has its own history and claims. These issues could be resolved in the roots only. Hence, the present discussion.I have presented things here from the Wikipedia, a neutral source.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
True, they will only begin to be solved once religion has disappeared from the planet. Until then, we're screwed.
What Miraz (supreme actor) of Ahmedi ..... so die of wash room ..... and who claims to Mary, Jesus, Adam , Noah and much more even once God !! therefore Miraz a Top class liar...... shame on him ............
And Ahmedi are not muslims because they believe in false Prophet Mirza and ignore the Ayat of Quran and Hadith of Prophet of islam Muhammad (saw) about the Muhammad (SAW) as SEAL OF PROPHET .......
And yet, despite such a bloody history, people flock to that cult and continue the shame.
Hi friend (Q)
The shame is mostly on the part of the Skeptics Atheists and Agnostics;they either had no good history or they are so shameful of that that they don't even own it.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
I feel no shame, Usmanali - I even use my own name and do not need to lie about who I am. I do not even lie about being peaceful and then provoke others.
But - I am not a Muslim. We atheist skeptics are honest. We even hold honesty as a value to be admired. I see that is not a virtue you hold dear.
I would use my own name, but it's not very funny.
And, while I ponder that provocative yet void of content statement, I can't help but see it as little more than a childish, emotional outburst meant to produce hostility.
Or, can you actually explain it?
Hi friend sabrebIade
Please check your sources as to how many people were killed on way to and going into Mecca; besides what you have already mentioned in your post " except for ten men and women who had mocked and made fun of him in songs and verses. Some of these were later pardoned".
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
OK; and consequently the results have been presented here.
Thanks
Mohhamud peaceful...?
Thats is just too easy.
I ain't even goin to say anything Paas.
And the use of the title "prince of peace" is halarious man.
You knew this thread was bait when you came thru the door.
hahahahaha
Isn't war what your fishing for?
Chummin for chumps?
It represenst what I think I smell every time I hear a leant leftist liberal progressive spout off.
It makes the perfect statement.
Every time I hear the babbling inanaity of the left. I think..."What the hell is that smell?". Then I just look at the pic and it is all clear.
Hi friend Greek One
Will you please provide the detail battle-wise?
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
oh it was terrible!!
The dead fought until their very last breath, and then some even battled on after that for a few hours!
you must be very sad at the misconception and misinformation that is being spread about your people.
can I update my total?
I just got work that 1 of the wounded final died (his was a VERY long suffering)
I now count 109 killed, 78 wounded, and 14 suffered a bad rash
I thought the Meccans were at war with Dan Dare???
The Meccan was green, flying around on his little personalised flying saucer trying to cause problems for everyone...
Or am I off on a different tack here??
Mostly peacful and ass like LM
http://www.dandare.org.uk/
I think everything you need about the war is on this website...
Hi friend luvpassion
There have been wars for spread of democracy, you know.
Thanks
I would like my friends to calculate the figure of Meccans killed in "war "with Muhammad- the Prince of Peace,
You will be surprised to know; none; not a drop of blood was shed.
You contradict yourself here Mr Ahmadi, if no blood was shed what did they do?
Thumbwrestle?
At the age of 25, Momo was pressed into battle by his uncle Abu Tabir against the Ethiopians. What was the result of this battle for mohhamud?
How many kills did Mohhamud himself, score?
Hi friend TMMason
It never happened; please check your sources.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
oh it did...
It is a shameful part of your prophets history and one better forgoten as far as Islam is concerned.
But yes. It happened.
You know as well as I do.
His score was 0.
Because he ran from the field of Battle and hid.
His uncle Abu Tabir could barely keep the people of the city of Mecca from killing him, or exiling him.
Instead... they made him a shephard.
Something which was considered the lowest rung of the ladder back then.
Ahhh... poor Momo.
That lil episode made it a pretty funny thing. When he came back from contemplating his cowardice and shitty life in the hills one day and said he was a prphet.
I can hear 'em all laughing hysterically now.
Hahahaha.... yeah musta' been a good one.
That was a big hurdle to over-come in declaring and enforcing his prophet-ship.
Really...I had some respect for him til learning this info. Thanks TM. As a soldiers wife I have no respect for cowardice under fire.
Hi friend TMMason
I think you saw a bad dream. Now wake up; and quote your sources.
Thanks
You could read Serge Triffkovik and some others.
But you wouldn't believe it anyways, Paas.
You know the sources well as I do. The Qu'ran itself constantly defends Momo and makes allowances for his sick behavior, or bad choices.
There are so many concilliatory verses in the Qu'ran for Mohhamud it is a joke.
That book serves Momo's behaviour, and Momo, more than it serves any God.
Hi folks
There are no such historical sources; he might be referring to some fiction work. Others are requested to check and confirm.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Im not sure how accurate it is, but "The sword of the Prophet" is a book writen by Serge Triffkovik.
I believe he refrences it in there. I also believe Daniel pipes writes on it.
Hi friend Greek One
I think he is not an historian; Muhammad had not uncle named "Abu Bakr" and Muhammad never fought against Ethiopians.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Yes I noticed my error and corrected it long ago man. To many Abus in Islam for me...
The battle and the story is a fact. There were many such battles between the Ethiopeans and Mecca, not to mention the Muslims upon the founding of Islam, also.
Islam did not spread through peace Paas.
Srđa Trifković is a Serbian-American writer and was foreign-affairs editor for the paleoconservative magazine Chronicles (1998–2009).
He has a PhD in history from the University of Southampton.
He is also director of the Center for International Affairs at the Rockford Institute.
Trifkovic was also an unofficial spokesman for the Republika Srpska government in the 1990’s.
He is the author of Sword of the Prophet, a book on the history and doctrines of Islam.
Srđa is also the former consultant to President Vojislav Koštunica.
He comments on Balkan politics, and is a regular columnist for several conservative publications in the United States.
So he knows a bit more about history than I do.
Hi friend sabrebIade
I thank you for providing me the information about the book and its author. Is the book available online? I will read it.
Have you read the book yourself?
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
@paar ...then why did muhammad moved out of mecca at first place my friend?..since he did , it meant ppl didnt welcome his ideas..isn't it?
Yes Paas.
You can purchase Trifkoviks book online.
You should also invest in a book by the name of... "The Legacy of Jihad", by Andrew Bostom, and his other works may help you out a bit too.
Hi friend sabrebIade
I have checked Srđa Trifković's book on the Wikipedia; it seems to be more on the current political scenario in the World rather than a history book on the life of Muhammad.
I might agree on many points presented by him on the Militant Muslims presently and in the past.
He might have only studied the History of the West; I don't see any depth in his writings on roots of Islam or on the Life of Muhammad.
We Ahmadi peaceful Muslim; do see always Religion and State separately. You may like to view a Press Conference of Mr. Nasim Mahdi, Vice- President of our Community in America on FOXNEWS in this connection:
http://bit.ly/dttFZB
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/ … lam-peace/
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
There were absolutely no killings on the event of conquest of Mecca, it was a very peaceful conquest indeed unparalleled in human history. I give hereunder a chart given by Wikipedia, link at the end:
Conquest of Mecca
Part of the Muslim-Quraysh Wars
Date 11 January, 630 CE
Location Mecca
Result Muslim victory and Quraish surrender
Belligerents
Muslims
Quraysh
Commanders
Muhammad
Abu Sufyan ibn Harb
Strength
10,000 Unknown
Casualties and losses
0 0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquest_of_Mecca
for the details, the above link should be accessed.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
Regarding Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, between Muhammad and the Meccans, Wikipedia adds:
Thus, Muhammad was left with "no alternative" but march on to Mecca. With the 10,000 men of his army, he marched on to Mecca where he ordered his troops not to harm women, children, old people, those who surrender, those who are sick, those who are weak, not to destroy houses, and destroy trees or gardens.
Thus, there was no bloodshed in the conquest of Mecca.
Islam spread widely and quickly during the two years that the treaty was in effect.
While Muhammad had 1,400 followers when he signed the treaty in Hudaybiyya, he had well over 10,000 for his conquest of Mecca two years later.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Hudaybiyyah
As could be seen and observed Islam spreads more in peace than in war; due to its brilliant, rational and reasonable arguments.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Stop it oaas... my stomach hurtds sooo bad from luaghing.... it isn't funny anymore.
Islam spread through te sword Paas. We all know it.
Your Islamic history is as revisionist, as the left's American history.
You guys are toooo funny.
"Thus, Muhammad was left with "no alternative" but march on to Mecca. With the 10,000 men of his army, he marched on to Mecca where he ordered his troops not to harm women, children, old people, those who surrender, those who are sick, those who are weak, not to destroy houses, and destroy trees or gardens."
As per your quote above....
Why would someone have an "army" if he intends to spread Islam pecefully?
We would someone give specific instructions for not harming certain groups of people if he intends not to harm anyone at all?
Hi friends
I quoted the source as it is; one could form one's own opinion; it is OK with me.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Lets take a look at our peaceful prophets messages:
Um Haram informed us that she heard Muhammad the Great prophet saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition."
Um Haram added, I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Will I be amongst them?'
He replied, 'You are amongst them.'
Muhammad then said, 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.' I asked, [/b]'Will I be one of them, O Allah's Apostle?' He replied in the negative." [/b]
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 175 Narrated Khalid bin Madan.
Hi friend Rishy Rich
This is not in Quran; all teachings of Muhammad must emanate from Quran; where we have the context and reason/wisdom of the things happened in Muhammad's time; it is better than seeing things live. It is the root source among Muslims, whatever the denomination.
Hadith was not collected in Muhammad's time; it was collected some 250/300 years of Muhammad, and there is no consensus on their authenticity; it does not provide the context of the things.
Why do you bank upon the auxiliary sources; shows your weak viewpoint?
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
I prefer the teachings in the "eagle" comic from when I was a kid... Dan Dare always beat the Mekon in the end....
No big debates, no problems...
What are you two fighting about anyway?? God is God.. do you think he cares about your petty squabbles?? I don't think so....
If you fight with an idiot no one will ever tell you apart.....
Who use to memorize the quran? His followers! Who use to write down hadiths? His followers!
Its not weakness in my view, its the hypocrite nature within most muslims which hide the flaws of islam by selectively choosing hadiths depending on the context of any arguement!
Hi friend Rishy Rich
Hence; we only depend on the root; the first source of guidance for all the Muslims that is Quran; and in fact the only powerful historic source of Muhammad's life and his time. It is for your convenience also; you find all things that matter in a compact source.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
I dont think the root mentions that Jesus moved to India neither the root mentions the name "Mirza Ghulam"
I think, it does not pertain to the topic here; you may however express anything you like; It is OK with me
Thanks
First of all .... you did not mention the book name and secondly that is 100% accurate if spoken My Prophet of Islam Muhammad (saw) !!
Hi friends
I think everybody here now agrees that there was no fight between the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah done in March 628 CE till the death of Muhammad in June 632.
If there was one; please correct the figures; otherwise it would be considered a peaceful period; and Islam progressed in peace very much as is evidenced:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Hudaybiyyah
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
No, the evidence is clear, Muhammad murdered many to spread Islam.
lol.. i love you paarsyrrey...
you set up a forum topic without fact about a certain place where Islam has spread peacefully.. and then despite what anyone writes, you always sum up with "I think we can not agree that Islam spread peacefully"
What geographic area are we covering next?
Brazil?
Mexico?
Uranus?
a secret army of soldiers that have been stuck up there since I ate those two big macs the other night
Hi friend Greek One,(Q),Rishy Rich and others who opt to respond
Please see; I asked for only the period CE 628-632;
"I think everybody here now agrees that there was no fight between the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah done in March 628 CE till the death of Muhammad in June 632."
If you disagree; then please mention their names or number of Meccans killed in this period with your evidences in this connection.
If you cannot; then obviously, there was none.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
there were 24525 killed
they were all named Bob
Hi friends
Muhammad was born in the year CE 570 and he died in CE 632; he died at the age of 62/63 years.
He lived in Mecca upto the age of 52/53 years.
He migrated to Medina in CE 622; and live there for about ten years.
Out of this in the last four years; the period between Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the peaceful conquest of Mecca there were no killings of Meccans.
Now going to the post of our friend sabrebIade on page 2, four days ago, the previous battle between the Meccans and the Muslims was Battle of Trench.
“Battle of the Trench
Muslim casualties light, heavy Meccan losses”
Please see details by accessing the link:
http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/43801
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Now I get it. "Peaceful" means going to war and slaughtering everyone, with Ahmadi.
Hi friend (Q)
It is Muhammad's arguments that convinced the Meccans; so they attacked Muhammad and his followers lest their blind faith would come to an end.
You could see Medina people were only 3000 in numbers when 10000 Meccans attacked Medina; but after a year or two, when the Meccans tore away the Treaty of Hudaibiyya, and Muslims marched to Mecca; Muslims have increased to 10000 people. They all peacefully joined ranks of Muhammad.
If you ponder; you will agree with me; no compulsion.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Only if my brains disappeared entirely and were replaced with bat guano.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upOhSJTt8RE
watch !! this video VERSE OF QURAN clearly mentions that Muhammad (saw) is seal of Prophet
Hi friends
1. Muhammad was born in the year CE 570 and he died in CE 632; he died at the age of 62/63 years.
He lived in Mecca up to the age of 52/53 years.
He migrated to Medina in CE 622; and lived there for about ten years.
2. Out of this in the last four years; the period between Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the peaceful conquest of Mecca there were no killings of Meccans.
3. Now going to the post of our friend sabrebIade on page- 2 (http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/43398?page=2) the previous battle between the Meccans and the Muslims was Battle of Trench.
“Battle of the Trench
Muslim casualties- light, heavy Meccans losses”
5. It was the Meccans who in large numbers preferred to attack at Medina; Muhammad had to defend his position with much less numbers; so it was the Meccans who were the aggressors and were at fault, and those who were killed were the responsibility of the Meccans on both sides.
6. Before the Battle of trench; the battle of Uhud was fought:
Battle of Uhud
Part of the Muslim-Quraysh Wars
Date 19 March, 625
Location: The valley that is located in front of Mount Uhud, and it is located about 5 miles (8.0 km) from Medina
Result Tactical Meccan victory
Strategically indecisive
Belligerents
Muslims Quraysh-led Meccan coalition
Commanders –Muslim:
Muhammad
Hamza ibn ‘Abd al-Muttalibbr>Ali ibn Abi Taleb
Muslim Strength:
700 infantry,2-4 cavalry
Commanders -Meccans
Abu Sufyan ibn Harb
Khalid ibn al-Walid
Ikrimah ibn Abi-Jahl
Meccan Stregth:
3,000 infantry,
200 cavalry[1]
Muslim Casualties and losses :70
Meccans Casualties and losses: 44-45
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Uhud
It was the Meccans who were the aggressors as they attacked Medina with much large numbers than Muslims in Medina. The casualties of Muslims of 70+casualties of Meccans 45= 115, was therefore the responsibility of Meccans; Muhammad only defended his position.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Have you noticed yet that no matter how many times you repeat this mantra, no one is biting?
Hi friend (Q)
I will express truth peacefully as I see it; I don't mind if some have deaf ears:
It was the Meccans who were the aggressors
Muhammad only defended his position.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
So we have observed that going reverse from the opening of Mecca for Muhammad upto the Battle of Uhud; the Meccans attacked Medina; they were the agressors and in large numabers they attacked and Muhmmad had to defend his position with much less numbers and he won with the mercy of the Creator-God Allah YHWH. The Meccans being aggressors were responsible for the killings that happened.
I think now everybody understands it.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
1. Muhammad was born in the year CE 570 and he died in CE 632; he died at the age of 62/63 years.
He lived in Mecca up to the age of 52/53 years.
He migrated to Medina in CE 622; and lived there for about ten years.
2. Out of this in the last four years; the period between Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and the peaceful conquest of Mecca there were no killings of Meccans.
3. It were the Meccans who attacked Medina ,in large numbers, in the battle of Trench, battle of Uhud and battle of Badr; hence they were responsible for any blood shed done and causalities suffered by both sides.
I think it should not be difficult to understand for anybody.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
Muhammad never invaded any country "to conquer"; what he has to do with conquering territories? He won hearts of the people with brilliant arguments in Word of the Creator- God Allah YHWH.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
by paarsurrey 13 years ago
Hi friendsMeccans attacked Muhammad at Medina:The Battle of Uhud (Arabic: غزوة أحد Ġazwat ‘Uḥud) was fought on March 19, 625 AD (3 Shawwal 3 AH in the Islamic calendar) at the valley located in front of Mount Uhud, in what is now North-Western Arabia.[1] It occurred between a force from the Muslim...
by gulnazahmad 13 years ago
Prophet Muhammad was the most peaceful man on the earth ever and he is and he will be. People who say that religion teaches aggression should know that all the prophets Muhammad, Jesus and Moses who followed their religion to the extremes were the most peaceful human beings. They never invoked any...
by Mark Knowles 11 years ago
http://www.france24.com/en/20121004-art … unir-fatmi
by paarsurrey 11 years ago
Hi friendsIt is a wrong notion that Islam spread with sword or bloodshed. Islam never needed it; Islam’s brilliant teachings are sufficient to convince anybody for its natural spread.This can be well observed from the following article:Islam in IndiaFrom New World EncyclopediaIslam in India...
by pisean282311 12 years ago
guys what r ur views on muhammad?...
by mrnasir 10 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_100What Non-Muslims said about Him?http://www.gainpeace.com/index.php?opti … Itemid=105
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |