The common mistake made when an outsider views Buddhism, is that a Buddhist must be devoid of emotion. This is not true. Buddhism is about acceptance. Acceptance of pain, acceptance of sorrow, acceptance anger, acceptance of wisdom. A Buddhist is human and is realy only on a path to enlightenment and it is a moment to moment thing. A true Buddhist, must forget that they have ever reached any understanding of enlightenment and move along. True enlightenment is accepting that there is no such thing as enlightenment, only stages of awareness.
True enlightenment is only metaphore for acceptance and not knowing. A wise Buddhist will still get angry, they will still feel pain and they will still suffer. Buddhism is about not fearing these aspects of life and being in the moment of it. The aspects of life that will rarely change, must be accepted as they are, for everyone is Buddha. Everyone is aware, there is no pedestal. It is about humility and mastering the one true self that is "I am". It is about accepting that the one is all, the one is everything.
I got talking to my Daughter about Taoism , she replied ,,,,wait. wait a minute you are going way too deep for me Daddy
Tell her it's about the flow of nature and one must move with that nature, not against it. That is the Tao.
I did , it was all the other details that was too much. My Daughter is smarter than me at her age, it just a few people have the focus and attention span to adventure into these many spiritual or wisdom unknowns.
You are absolutely right - and nobody commenting in these threads these days seems to understand these things.
Study all things and and study as best you can with true acceptance, then you will be able to explain it without hesitation. She may not understand, but you did the best you can.
I think almost every truthful religion says to follow nature which is a creation of the Creator God.
"A wise Buddhist will still get angry, they will still feel pain and they will still suffer. "
If he is wise, he will not get angry. However if he realized his mistake of getting angry, then he is wise to that extent. When I get angry, I am giving in to foolishness in that moment of unmindfulness. This happened to me throughout my life. As age gets into me, I can now admit how foolish I was when I got angry. I am just that wise to this extent.
Please quote from Buddha for the above expression.
"True enlightenment is only metaphore for acceptance and not knowing".
Don't think it's a metaphor for anything, it just is what it is unto itself. Acceptance may be part of the path to enlightenment but they're not one and the same. Not knowing is it's own thing, also.
Patanjali believed that once we reach full enlightenment, there is no association with awareness at all and we become pure consciousness.
A Buddhist Monk from Tibet told me most important thing for me to remember was to ease the suffering of others.
So the "outsiders" ideas on Buddhism are the Americans?
How do you know what Americans think? Your point of view would have made a better impacted if didn't refer to another group of people that you have never met. Singling out a large group of people as if you knew them all but you don't.
In a statistical way,I can not say were you live; that all people are an 'outsider' on any topic.
I think it distracts from the point you are trying to make.
Even though America has adopted Buddhism, there still lingers ideas as to what it truly is. The Americans that don't know what Buddhism is, still refer to it as a religion. It's not... That was the idea of the thread.
We can all believe what we want. Some people believe it is a religion and some a philosophy or both. And it is not just Americans
You nailed it, Cara. Religion is a philosphy, a way of life and philosophy, if truly held, is held religiously or it is not truly held. They are one in the same, IMO. Many think there must be some sort of figure worship to make a philosophy a religion. It's all semantics.
I'm American and I was raised all sorts of ways. I had the idea that Buddhism was about escaping suffering and being eternaly happy. Now that I've been a Buddhist for a while, I have had the realization that it truly isn't. It's about being a gentleperson and gentle person. I learned that it was about self saccrifice and being one with that, that I see all around me, not just the people I want to be part of or the memories I want to be part of, but part of everything. To put it lightly, the oranism that is the universe.
Sometimes irritating sometimes helpful all the same.
And if you have ever put salt in your coffee ,instead of sugar you'll know what I mean
by sandra rinck 13 years ago
The four noble truths:life is suffering- happiness is only temporary:1. suffering- pain, fear and mental distress2. suffering caused by change- while temporarily happy, changes in this illusion cause suffering ie: death, divorce etc. 3. suffering of suffering- not even death is an escape from...
by RFox 10 years ago
1. Buddha is not God.2. Buddha never preached "the word of the God" and never considered himself a prophet. He said repeatedly to his students that he was merely a human being. 3. In teachings the Buddha specifically avoided all discussion of creationism or debates about the existence of...
by johnscott00 9 years ago
In a way there’s nothing very “Buddhist” about the meditation you’ll find on Wildmind. When you pay attention to your breath, or to the sensations in your body as you walk, or when you cultivate feelings of love for another person, you won’t have a sense that you’re doing anything very “religious.”...
by Gina Welds 4 years ago
I believe Buddhism makes me a better Christian. Can one be Buddhist and Christian at same time?Recently I have been battling with the question, "Am I a Christian Buddhist or a Buddhist Christian," and is it even possible to be both? I do believe that there are principles about...
by KrisL 7 years ago
Is there value in Buddhist meditation for people of other faiths?What is the value in Buddhist meditation for people of other religions, such as Christianity? Can it be combined with Christian spiritual practices?
by BobMonger 6 years ago
Can a person consider themselves to be both Christian and Buddhist without compromising themselves?In their purest form the teachings of both Buddha and Christ for virtuous living are identical. The great difference, as I see it, is Christ's teachings on the Kingdom of Heaven-a subject The Buddha...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|