jump to last post 1-31 of 31 discussions (44 posts)

Is Adobe Photoshop better than Illustrator?

  1. Azhar Kamar profile image80
    Azhar Kamarposted 6 years ago

    Hi fellow Hubbers! I'm a graphic designer for an advertising company in Singapore and I've been using Photoshop (CS, CS3 Extended and CS4) for almost 2 years now for most of my work.

    Now, I'm beginning to try Illustrator but I don't seem to like it and I think (based on my little experience) Photoshop has all the functions Illustrator has, and even more. So I thought I'll just go back to my friendly Photoshop CS3. But what I don't understand is why are some people using Illustrator?

    1. 0
      ryankettposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Would you use a camera to draw a picture? Or perhaps another perspective, would you use a pencil to take a photo?

  2. agvulpes profile image88
    agvulpesposted 6 years ago

    Azhar as they have a saying in the racing industry 'horses for courses'.
    I am no expert but as the name would imply Illustrator is mainly for drawing images (vectors) whereas Photoshop as the name implies is mainly for working with images (pixels).
    There is some cross-over in each program , so it would depend on what your own use was for each program.
    Personally I love Photoshop. cool

  3. MikeNV profile image76
    MikeNVposted 6 years ago

    Two different purposes as noted.  So I'm missing the question here? Vector graphics and Bitmap graphics have much different uses.

    1. darkside profile image83
      darksideposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      That there is the difference.

      Vector vs Raster.

      Some amazing illustration work can be done in Illustrator (though I prefer some good old Macromedia Freehand version 8). And when resized, it doesn't lose quality.

      But they have two different uses. They can overlap a little. But otherwise Illustrator isn't for editing photos.

      1. FuzzyCookie profile image90
        FuzzyCookieposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        I think I need to do a bit of research on "Vector" and  "Raster" yikes

        cheers! big_smile

        1. timorous profile image92
          timorousposted 6 years ago in reply to this

          If you have Illustrator or CorelDraw, and also have Photoshop or some other photo editing program,  start a new project in each, and use the Text tool and type in a short sentence at 12pt type.  Do the same in both programs.

          Now zoom in to view the text close up.  Illustrator, being primarily a 'vector' drawing will maintain full clarity at any zoom setting.  Whereas Photoshop or any (bitmap, or 'raster') photo editing program will go all fuzzy (pixellated) the more you zoom in (depending on the resolution you've chosen).

          That should give you an illustrative idea of the difference.

          1. FuzzyCookie profile image90
            FuzzyCookieposted 6 years ago in reply to this

            Thanks timorous! You've provided a great start with my research.  Your example helps to clearly distinguish between raster and vector smile.

            1. timorous profile image92
              timorousposted 6 years ago in reply to this

              You're welcome smile

          2. 59
            gdrockzposted 5 years ago in reply to this

            tumorous can u pl tell me which one is better for logo,banner designing.

  4. Siotosh profile image60
    Siotoshposted 6 years ago

    Use both, as the two programs complements each other. I started using Illustrator about a year ago and I've found it quite useful. The quality of the graphics in Illustrator looks so much better.

    1. arak1547 profile image61
      arak1547posted 5 years ago in reply to this

      I have to agree with this reply. Both have their advantages and they do compliment each other. I frequently create drawings in Illustrator CS5, but do all my cropping of rasterized images in Photoshop. I can load my PS layers in Illustrator and maintain everything I need for a great composition. In my opinion, they both are good at what they do.

  5. Ben Zoltak profile image82
    Ben Zoltakposted 6 years ago

    Useful information here, I've always wondered the difference, I've only used Photoshop. I find that rendering original art on Photoshop to be difficult. I've tried using Google Sketch Up for this purpose all seems clumsy...

  6. sunforged profile image68
    sunforgedposted 6 years ago

    every try to do extensive text layout in Photoshop!

    "horses for course" is well said

  7. 59
    curioxatposted 6 years ago

    I think the two programmes have two different uses...photoshop for more creative/ complexing designing and illustrator for intricate detailed drawings.

  8. timorous profile image92
    timorousposted 6 years ago

    The main difference is that Illustrator (and CorelDRAW and the like), are vector-based drawing programs.  This means that (non-photographic) graphic elements, including text, can be extensively re-sized and retain the same clarity of lines and edges. 

    I use CorelDRAW for doing layouts.  It's much easier to resize rectangles and other non-photo elements without losing quality.  Text editing is very flexible.  You can of course import bitmap photos as part of the layout.  I'm sure Illustrator works the same way.

    Whereas Photoshop and other photo-editing programs are bitmap-based.  You can't re-size too much without losing quality (blocky pixellation), unless you use a fairly high resolution, i.e. 600 dpi or more.

  9. Cheeky Girl profile image85
    Cheeky Girlposted 6 years ago

    Photoshop is for mainly editing and manipulating artwork that can include Photography, it's a "bitmap" editor, whereas Illustrator is a "Vector" editing software application. It's totally awesome. I just did a hub on Illustrator with an artist, and version 8 is muck compared to the new version. But in the hands of a pro, it can sizzle. Web desingers will - if they do it for a living - use both these packages and an honorable mention for Corel Painter too, as it rocks, and has more paint options than Photoshop. Hope that helps yawl!

  10. asalvani profile image71
    asalvaniposted 6 years ago

    I think with illustrator you can do better vectors and there is a big difference in this field.

  11. Sandro Signoli profile image60
    Sandro Signoliposted 6 years ago

    Use Illustrator for web design such as logos and Photoshop for photo editing.

  12. Ashukah profile image59
    Ashukahposted 6 years ago

    I have used Illustrator a little bit before when I was taking a graphic arts class, however, I normally only use Photoshop Elements since it's all I own on my laptop and it is GREAT.

  13. Stacie L profile image87
    Stacie Lposted 6 years ago

    i use free or nearly free programs that are similar to Adobe Photoshop.
    it doesn't make sense to pay so much for software hmm

  14. geraldinegerongay profile image76
    geraldinegerongayposted 6 years ago

    These programs have their own specialties and features. There are instances when you need to use photoshop because illustrator doesn't have this feature and vice verse depending on your needs.

  15. 59
    lilunsiposted 6 years ago

    Those are 2 programs with 2 different functions
    Maybe you work with more imaging jobs, so the illustrator just help you a little

    1. DenverPhotography profile image60
      DenverPhotographyposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Agreed.  The OP is comparing apples to oranges.

  16. ProCW profile image84
    ProCWposted 6 years ago

    I like PS better than Illustrator. I guess it's more about preference.

  17. Sunny_S profile image60
    Sunny_Sposted 6 years ago

    They are two different software programs for two different things matey. Stick with Photoshop and beware of the content aware function.

  18. FuzzyCookie profile image90
    FuzzyCookieposted 6 years ago

    Never tried illustrator, I think it's similar to corel draw. eh?

    1. Sunny_S profile image60
      Sunny_Sposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Kinda similar but illustrator has got many features.

      1. FuzzyCookie profile image90
        FuzzyCookieposted 6 years ago in reply to this

        In  that case, I'll have to try and get Illustrator on my pc big_smile

  19. I am DB Cooper profile image66
    I am DB Cooperposted 6 years ago

    You should ask BP this question. They seem to be doing photo manipulation on every picture they release to the public these days. If only they could spend their resources doing something else...

    1. FuzzyCookie profile image90
      FuzzyCookieposted 6 years ago in reply to this

      Sorry, I aint aware what BP stands for :s. care to elaborate ? smile

  20. LilMsMoonshine profile image61
    LilMsMoonshineposted 6 years ago

    Illustrator is a vector based program that does not use pixels whereas photoshop creates with pixels. If your resolution is too low, your image becomes pixelated, which can sometimes happen with text in photoshop. Vector based programs such as Illustrator allows the artwork to be resized without losing resolution.

  21. DaveysRecipeRead profile image61
    DaveysRecipeReadposted 5 years ago

    It's the flexibility that Illustrator offers. You can make a pixel graphic from a vector illustration  for web projects where gifs or jpgs are needed but you can't make a pixel image into a freely scalable vector graphic.
    Photoshop's intended use was originally that of retouching photos and Freehand and Illustrator were made for making razor sharp, scaleable graphics (also for export into flash).

    In the textile industry vector work is preferred over pixel graphics because prints can be made in just about every conceivable size for any conceivable product from one source file. Since Illustrator is object oriented (like cut outs, each with it's own unique information) each object can be targeted for special colors or treatments. Pixel graphics just don't offer that kind of flexibility. The same options are open for printing of ads in magazines, cards and other literature (all of us have seen this stuff before).

    Thanks to Illustrator's mesh tool (first appeared in the 9th version) you can also make photorealistic illustrations. Photoshop can and is also used for illustration but it's real power is in enhancing pixel graphics for web and print and also 3D materials and wraps among other things. It's like  the Rome of graphics in that just about all roads in pro graphics lead to it and must go through it.
    Illustrator and Photoshop are like apples and oranges, they really  can't be compared because their jobs are quite different.

  22. rembrandz profile image87
    rembrandzposted 5 years ago

    I personally think that Photoshop and Illustrator cannot be put through a competition in the same pool. Photoshop generates raster images whereas Illustrator generates vector images.
    Illustrator and Photoshop have their own advantages and disadvantages. It takes a lot of work for illustrator to get what we could create in Photoshop (for instance the airbrush effect). But if an artist is able to pain-stakingly create such a thing in Illustrator, then the sky is the limit for that image because it becomes a masterpiece in the vector world. Hence one can scale it up to whatever large size imaginable without loosing image quality or worry about anti-alias issues.
    I love Illustrator, however I still cannot live without a regular dose of Photoshop. Thanks for this QA session.

  23. Maxine Lee profile image79
    Maxine Leeposted 5 years ago

    The programs aren't in competition with each other - both serve a different purpose.

    If you do a lot of flat vector work, logo design or surface pattern illustration then you need to get to grips with Illustrator as Photoshop isn't as geared towards those things (as Illustrator).

    I use both programs - Illustrator (for the uses I've already mentioned) and Photoshop for texture work, layering type and digital painting.

  24. ChristinS profile image93
    ChristinSposted 5 years ago

    Illustrator is superior for text graphics and vectors.  In design I use both as both have strengths and weaknesses.  Vector graphics are especially useful for items that would need to be both in print and on the web - because you can stretch them without pixelation, loss of quality etc. 

    Illustrator and Photoshop each have their advantages and you'll be a better designer if you master them both.

  25. imkd profile image60
    imkdposted 4 years ago

    whatever we can design on illustrator, we can't draw it on photoshop. so both are different but in quality i like illustrator most.

  26. Prokid profile image60
    Prokidposted 4 years ago

    Both are good and do the same thing but most people just prefer photoshop.

  27. vectorism profile image72
    vectorismposted 4 years ago

    For some who thinks Photoshop & Illustrator is the same, such as they saw the plane & helicopter is no different.. lol

  28. businesscardprint profile image78
    businesscardprintposted 4 years ago

    From a commercial point of view, if you're starting out as a designer then it's important to learn the differences between pixel-based software (Photoshop etc.) and vector (Illustrator, Freehand, Corel etc.) as this can impact heavily on the print costs for your client.

    If the logo(s) is only ever to be used on a website, then any of the graphics programs, such as Photoshop, Illustrator, Corel, Freehand etc. are suitable.

    However, if the site owner is ever likely to need printed stationery, (to include the logo), then the best option is Illustrator.

    Logos using more than one colour, and designed in Photoshop, can generally only be printed using a 4 colour process (CMYK). e.g. if the logo is designed using just red & black in Photoshop then it would still need to be reproduced using a mix of CMYK, (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow & Black). This means that all the client's stationery would need to be printed in 4 colours, (expensive!).

    This is ok for business cards, but when you factor in such things as letterheads, compliment slips, printed envelopes, NCR forms (Invoices, Credit Notes, Statements) etc. etc. then costs are going to be a major concern.

    Illustrator can produce the logo as 2 spot colours, red & black. Spot Colours are explained here: http://businesscardprint.hubpages.com/h … olour-CMYK

    This significantly reduces the costs of stationery, especially NCR forms, printed envelopes & continuous stationery (computer forms).

    Most professional logos are created in Illustrator for that reason.

    If anyone is looking to make the switch from web design to print design, (which can be very lucrative), then I've written some tips on making the transition here: http://www.castleprint.co.uk/web-design … esign.html

    When I get a bit of extra time I'll create a Hub on the subject as there's a fair bit involved.

    Hope this helps.

    1. lobobrandon profile image82
      lobobrandonposted 4 years ago in reply to this

      Hi businesscardprint - I'm new to designing and have got both illustrator and photoshop. It would be awesome if you could write a tutorial on how to use them smile There's so much in them - where do I begin?
      Plus there aren't any good ones online you could rank high there in time

  29. carolinemd21 profile image70
    carolinemd21posted 4 years ago

    I'm a designer and use both photoshop and illustrator. Illustrator is for drawing and kind of harder to use at first then photoshop. Photoshop is for editing photos.

  30. 0
    Rad Manposted 4 years ago

    I can't imagine one without the other. Illustrator, photoshop and indesign are all tools of the trade. Only using one would be like eating steak with only a spoon. Photoshop and Illustrator are nothing alike, but both are needed.

  31. adriatk profile image72
    adriatkposted 4 years ago

    I think they're both important in their own ways. Photoshop is essential for editing photos, and Illustrator is crucial for the manipulation of text and typography. Personally, when I am making a graphic design piece, I prefer Illustrator because I love to play around with the text.