The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
I approve of anyone with good aim. I aim to stay away from dentists.
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
No, just like I don't approve of the congress man yelling 'liar' at Obama. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike the president, he's still the commander in chief. Treat him with respect or get the hell out.
Maybe you're right, but at least it were better than throwing a backpack.
Did you see those shoes? They had no style whatsoever. I would have ducked too. No way would I have let those ugly shoes brush my person.
Yeah me too. Funny how all Presidents are most artful at that.
Pr0metheus wrote:
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
No, just like I don't approve of the congress man yelling 'liar' at Obama. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike the president, he's still the commander in chief. Treat him with respect or get the hell out.
Get the hell out of where? The incident took place in Iraq.
Pr0metheus wrote:
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
No, just like I don't approve of the congress man yelling 'liar' at Obama. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike the president, he's still the commander in chief. Treat him with respect or get the hell out.
I approve of the journalist's action, Bush deserved to get hit, I'm just mad the guy missed. Pr0metheus, it doesn't matter if Bush was President/'Commander-In-Chief', that doesn't automatically grant him 'respect'. Respect is EARNED - not given simply because of a title someone holds. Bush did nothing respectable in 8yrs but be relieved of duty as President of the United States
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
I think it's funny how the secret service got no coverage for failing. Bush would have been screwed if those shoe's had bombs in them.
marinealways24 wrote:
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
I think it's funny how the secret service got no coverage for failing. Bush would have been screwed if those shoe's had bombs in them.
I'd assume that scanning and sniffing procedures were in place. It's hard to detect a whiff of an impending throw though.
darkside wrote:
marinealways24 wrote:
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
I think it's funny how the secret service got no coverage for failing. Bush would have been screwed if those shoe's had bombs in them.
I'd assume that scanning and sniffing procedures were in place. It's hard to detect a whiff of an impending throw though.
lol agreed
Don't you think they should have reacted in between the first and second shoe?
Remember, they have missed shoe bombs going onto airplanes. This is government workers we are talking about.
F. Kenneth Taylor wrote:
Pr0metheus wrote:
dentist83 wrote:
The Journalist who threw the 2 shoes to Bush. Do you approve his action. Tell Why.
No, just like I don't approve of the congress man yelling 'liar' at Obama. It doesn't matter how much you like or dislike the president, he's still the commander in chief. Treat him with respect or get the hell out.
I approve of the journalist's action, Bush deserved to get hit, I'm just mad the guy missed. Pr0metheus, it doesn't matter if Bush was President/'Commander-In-Chief', that doesn't automatically grant him 'respect'. Respect is EARNED - not given simply because of a title someone holds. Bush did nothing respectable in 8yrs but be relieved of duty as President of the United States
I agree with you, by that I mean I agree that Joe Wilson did the right thing by calling Obama a liar! He deserves no respect simply because he is the President!
darkside wrote:
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.
tksensei wrote:
darkside wrote:
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.
Did he hit Bush with the shoes or did he miss?
darkside wrote:
tksensei wrote:
darkside wrote:
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.
Did he hit Bush with the shoes or did he miss?
Not sure, but I think Bush dodged them.
darkside wrote:
tksensei wrote:
darkside wrote:
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.
Did he hit Bush with the shoes or did he miss?
He missed. Good thing for him that he did.
tksensei wrote:
darkside wrote:
tksensei wrote:
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.Did he hit Bush with the shoes or did he miss?
He missed. Good thing for him that he did.
A vicious beating for a miss, what would he have got for a non-lethal shoe to the face?
tksensei wrote:
darkside wrote:
They should have given the guy a Nobel Peace Prize.
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.
Bush is the anti-christ.
marinealways24 wrote:
darkside wrote:
tksensei wrote:
They 'should have' given the guy what they probably did give him after he was dragged out of there - a viscious beating.Did he hit Bush with the shoes or did he miss?
Not sure, but I think Bush dodged them.
Bush dodged him , he was quick.

working