There is a hub on here that has William Wordsworth's poem, "I wandered lonely as a cloud...."
published without any credit to the original author, without comment or text backup, such as a review, or commentary on why the Hubber likes the poem; it is simply published as a stand-alone piece.
The person has just the one Hub; joined but 2 days ago, and apparently is totally clueless..
Is this outright plagiarism, or is the era of the poet so far back that there is no possibility of copyright infringement? I was not sure whether to flag it or not, so I just left a simple comment, saying,
"Ah, yes, lovely poem, originally penned by William Wordsworth (1770-1850 / Cumberland / England)."
It is not showing up, so they evidently set their comments to be moderated prior to appearing....
Hi, what I think is that because it's a famous poem it should not be plagiarism. But the author of the hub should have definitely put the authors name. So I would not flag it, only if it keeps happening.
Hope this helped
The definition of plagiarism does not depend upon whether or not the author if famous. None of us Hubbers are famous, but if anyone copies our work, it is plagiarism.
The issue here, is whether any publishing house, or possible descendants, still have a copyright interest in the works of Wordsworth.
Work goes into the public domain that is 1920 or maybe it's 1921 or earlier. Not listing the original author is bad ethics. I don't think doing it is right. This is claiming it as your own work.
Right--UNLESS a descendant or publishing house has inherited or purchased the copyright, in which case, it could go on virtually 'forever.'
You generally can't do anything about copyright. X-amount of years pass and it expires, with a very small number of exceptions (Peter Pan etc). You can't just by your copyright back.
The eternal rights grabs generally relate to trademarks rather than copyrights.
Wordsworth's poetry *is* out of copyright.
* It was published before 1923, Wordsworth died over 70 years ago, no Berne Convention perpetual copyright exception that I can see.
Because of when it is written, the hub is probably not violating copyright. But you still can't take credit for writing the poem. I would also think that you could still get in trouble for duplicate content (assuming it is published elsewhere online).
I can't find that hub. Maybe it's gone. Anyway, regardless of copyright concerns, it would eventually be flagged as duplicate content.
I feel that the author should have been credited for his work, Whether it is copyrighted or not is irrelevant. If i am not mistaken Wordsworths works are now public domain. Maybe the Hubber who posted the poem thought that public domain literature does not need to be credited. Your comment to the hubber was very diplomatic DzyMsLizzy, I doubt I would have been able to restrain myself, i would probably have just commented ( Please Credit the Original author ). Keeping in mind he might not have intentionally wanted to commit the crime of plagiarism, but rather show his appreciation for a much liked poem and not have known the proper way to credit someone, that is as polite as I could have been.
I myself am a fan of Wordsworth, and will probably write a hub about two of my favorite poems he wrote ( We are seven and She was a phantom of delight by William Wordsworth ).
sorry for the long winded reply, I do tend to ramble on a bit in the wee hours of the morning before my first cup of coffee.
Actually, Hubpages does not accept any duplicate content. I am sure that poem is published on hundreds if not thousands of websites.
yes but in this case we cant share any quote or poem?... unless its not published? I cant even say ...."home sweet home".... because it was published on millions websites.... hmmmm....
A short phrase like "home sweet home" isn't long enough to trigger any plagiarism detector. That's intentional, of course. It would be impossible to post anything otherwise.
I am talking about an entire poem. You can get around it by posting the poem as a graphic.
When I first started here I had the full text of a Robert F. Kennedy speech and it got flagged as duplicate. I got around it by quoting less of the speech.
Yes, you can post copied material, even copyrighted copied material, as a graphic or even as a pdf file and will usually get around the bots and software looking for it.
It is still theft (talking large blocks here) however. I have found a couple of pdf files republishing my material without permission and have gotten them taken down. No matter what the form I take a dim view of people stealing the content I worked hard to produce.
Just my personal opinion, but I hate seeing instructions posted on how to get around the requirements; how to steal without getting caught.
We are allowed a certain percentage of content in our hubs that are quoted from elsewhere. It's somewhere in the Learning Center. It is a small percent.
While not under copyright, I am pretty sure it would be duplicate content.
I have just flagged the loser for duplicate content. It would be good if lots of other people would do the same. I hope the moron's account will be deleted as well.
I notice said imbecile replied to you in text speak, Dzy. I doubt this subhuman is capable of writing a sentence in English on its own.
Thanks for flagging it! If it is duplicate content, it needs to come down. Of course, one flag is all we need. Multiple flags of the same thing will only make it harder for us to get to other important flagged issues in a timely manner.
When I initially looked in the flagging menu, "duplicate content" did not appear in the list...only similar things, such as 'miscategorized' or 'copied content,' which specifically referred to other Hubs, not works-at-large.
So, I was unsure how to proceed, hence, I came here.
Good call DzyMsLizzy,
I am sure the Wordsworth family will have something to say on this matter.
Basic copyright law states that any published work is the property of the author and estate for 70 years after the death of the author. If however there are descendants then the copyright goes to them in perpetuity. The Wordsworth family are very much alive.
in other words publishing this poem is totally illegal, without permission of the Wordsworth family and as to the point about using quotes. That is okay as long as you cite the author. Apart from just plain good manners you will avoid a costly court case.
It is hard to believe these people are ignorant of the law, and they are publishing here?
I think that's plagiarism, regardless of the fact that this poem was written a long, long time ago. The hubber should have mentioned that this is the poem by William Wordsworth, or at least in some way made it known that it is not his original work. If he did no such thing I'd flag the hub.
Maybe your coomment didn't appear because he simply didn't want to approve it. Perhaps he denied it.
by akeejaho 12 years ago
I am kinda flattered, but mad as a wet hornet. Has anyone here ever heard of barryrutherford? Well, compare his Hub, Bipolar,more on this subject, and So, whats wrong with being bipolar? I mean, good grief! And this guys profile says he has studied law. (Studied, but...
by Missy 6 years ago
I posted this hub about MOPS a few days ago: http://thatmommyblogger.hubpages.com/hu … S-Meeting. It took me hours to write, and I wrote it about a very personal topic. There is no chance that I plagiarized it, and I did not post it on any other site.I'm getting a duplicate...
by Jean Bakula 4 years ago
I wrote a piece about Scorpio Sun Sign People about 6 years ago when I was new here. Most of my main niche is astrology, and instead of contacting me civilly to ask if there was a problem, my piece that was on Exemplore was just pulled from the site. I had just edited it tonight because it's a good...
by Marlene Bertrand 8 years ago
What is duplicate content?When I get flagged for duplicate content, it kind of breaks my heart, especially when I write something that is totally original - no quotes, no links, etc. I see so many "duplicate" hub oriented hubs and wonder why they exist without being flagged as duplicate...
by Aficionada 10 years ago
A while ago I checked out one hub of a suspicious writer. I mean by that, a forum post seemed to indicate that the writer was one of the get-rich-quick, I-can-teach-you-everything-you-need-to-know-to-make-a-million-online types. That was my assumption, but I could be wrong.Anyway, the...
by Keith Schroeder 11 years ago
I propose that duplicate content be banned outright on HubPages. Hub Hopping shows the massive amount of stolen or copied content on HP and denigrates serious writers here. Others have made the same complaint, but I think HP should seriously consider banning duplicate content outright.This isn't...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|