Google's scorecard says Squids have NO style! Well, that's my loose interpretation of it anyway. I just had the opportunity to read a previous post from Paul Edmondson regarding site-wide traffic loss, and that was the conclusion. Oh my, shocking for me to finally be told I have no style. My tentacles are in quite a tizzy right now…
Aw, that doesn't bother me a bit. I have never claimed to have style. My grandma used to say that I needed to be refined, and not act like a hillbilly. I told her that refined flour has all of the good stuff taken out, and all that's left is starch and fluff - so, who wants to have style and be refined?
So, if we don't have style, we certainly have passion!
@Shades-of-truth "So, if we don't have style, we certainly have passion!" So then, I shouldn't worry about my seriously questionable style moments? I have no style, but I have a sizable smile right now, thanks to you!
It's the step child syndrome ... guess some people need to re-read Cinderella
Well, this Squid had enough style to have a Hub of the Day last week, and have another hub shared on Facebook by a local radio station, to the tune of about 45,000 page views.
Don't judge me by my monster-patterned sweater...
Lisavollrath, is that the one that went viral? I was wondering if you ever found out what caused it.
You may want to reread the article. As I'm reading it, it doesn't say Squids have no style, not in the least. In fact, it asserts that lensmasters coming from Squidoo have a certain style of composing lenses / hubs and suggests that it is the style that is this being targeted by Panda. "... it is common to see what looks like a site wide change because many authors use a similar style of making Hubs. I believe this is the case with Squidoo imports. Many imported accounts [that] share a similar style... ," and "It appears that this Google update is particularly hard on it."
I didn't see that as a negative statement, but rather an assertion of fact. We used the same tools to build lenses on Squidoo, so to a degree there are many similarities in the way the articles are drafted. Though I've seen quite a few attacks aimed directly at Squids from Hubbers (and visa versa), I find no reason to take the statement to be an verbal attack on former squids, or even a snipe at them.
Please forgive me if I misread your actual statement and concern.
@lisavollrath That's my [facetious] point, Lisa! Write on…
Google rates HP Hubs with the Red thumbs down button. I would not go by their rating methods.
This is what Paul E. said on that post:
"However, it is common to see what looks like a site wide change because many authors use a similar style of making Hubs. I believe this is the case with Squidoo imports. Many imported accounts share a similar style. It appears that this Google update is particularly hard on it."
I think he was talking about the cookie-cutter articles that were made using the software program that was for sale for making Squidoo articles. It wrote about 200 words of content and then uploaded 20 or more Amazon products. There's at least one new account on HP now which has hundreds of those. Truthfully, many writers on Squidoo complained about that style of article, too.
Paul wasn't talking about every article which came from Squidoo and he was offering an explanation why the newly imported articles were experiencing loss of traffic.
He did say in that post that he would look at the data and be "back shortly." That was two weeks ago. Maybe he'll give an update today.
It is 3 weeks ago now. I don't think they've figured it out yet, since some of the older accounts on Hubpages aren't doing well either. Google might not like so much similar content.
I know some of mine are hurting, because some of the new Squidoo articles that are on the same topic are outranking mine and some of mine are doing that to theirs. We ended up sharing traffic with each other. The site traffic is down too, so maybe Panda hit us for that too. Who can figure it all out?
I suppose when the 4 months squid time is over, HP will deal with cookie cutter hubs?
by Tanya Jones 4 years ago
It's been only six weeks since that fateful morning when I learned, before my morning coffee no less, that I'd be moving my lenses to HP. I seem none the worse for the event and am glad I made the move. You, fellow former-Squids and Hubbers? How have your thoughts changed or not since that...
by Lisa Vollrath 4 years ago
Fellow Squid refugees, as many of us come to the end of our first full month on HubPages, I'm wondering how those edits are coming. What's been your process for slogging through the old lenses, to turn them into shiny new hubs?
by Person of Interest 5 years ago
I just compared the 3-month, Quantcast charts for HP and Squidoo. Based on trends, HP is now your better bet! I kid you not. Although Google is probably still not thrilled with all writing sites in general, I believe that HP is no longer in any special doghouse.Squid chart, click the 3-months:...
by Dani Merrier 20 months ago
I recently read some reviews on Consumer Affairs, which were absolutely devasting and have got me a little worried. I was wondering if anyone else wrote at similar sites prior to HubPages and why they made the switch, and if they had thought about going back.
by Paul Edmondson 2 hours ago
For those of you that are writers on AxleAddict, we wanted to let you know that we are doing a small test on the site. Our plan is to edit every article on AxleAddict in the next couple of weeks. At this point most of the edits will be small. They will include title updates, sharpening of...
by Dr. John Anderson 5 years ago
There has been a huge traffic spike over the last two days that has appeared in my traffic as well. It is not shown by Squidoo. This time it may be a general increase rather than being due to one or two hubs going viral. Any one else seeing it in their traffic? Image shows Quantcast for page views...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|