All HP staff are between a rock and a hard place right now it seems, and trying to climb out of a disastrous event and save the site.
Everyone loses when offenses start operating and putting out little ground fires takes precious time away from the advancing crown fire. We need plenty of fire retardant and working together.
Devastating events are devastating and each person has their own view and the closer to home it comes, the more easily offended. Its hard to move on from how awful it is on a personal basis to see the possibility of a common good.
Even the best author or editor may make errors or be perceived to.
It seems like life and death online and HP is going for life.
HP may make some errors along the way and some more folks may leave.
All is not yet lost and hopefully those who disagree with decisions made will be able to recoup their perceived losses without personal attacks. Its hard though not to take things personally.
Great commentary, colorfulone. I've been feeling this ugly fire for the last couple days with all that's going on (HubPro, ECs, etc) and it's not good for the writer atmosphere. I hope it burns out soon without too many more casualties. But it wrong stuff happens, it needs to be exposed and addressed. Whew! Rough times for our little community, huh? Peace.
I'm in the dark about the problems you mentioned, colorfulone, but I hope they get resolved without too much difficulty.
The personal attacks made on a Hub Staff member yesterday sickened me. HubPages is a good site. The Staff here have always acted in good faith.
I agree. I think it's fine to offer constructive criticism and that this criticism was very necessary in the case in question. I don't think that the HP staff member should have been attacked, though.
Paradigmsearch - I agree with you that having names named was an unfortunate thing, and I also agree that HP has always acted in good faith (from what I know). The thread probably needed to happen, though, because the manner in which at least that one hub was edited should be examined. Is that really the way the site intended for the HubPro program to operate? Are there other extremely modified hubs on the site now?
I did wonder, when all of that was going on, whether this discussion was basically the result of one incident and the misunderstanding of one editor in terms of what was required. I cannot speak to what is happening with HubPro because I do no participate in it, but if this whole thing is the result of what I just said, I think we need to tone things down a bit. Clearly, more training is needed in some areas, but this is no reason to rip an entire program, that was set up to help people, to shreds.
Thank you, colorfulone for this thread and your message. It is very difficult for a lot of folks right now as well as the staff. Yet, if we all pull together I strongly feel we can put out these fires and go forward with renewed confidence and motivation to make HubPages a superior writing site.
Even if I disagree on some points, it is encouraging to see Paul Edmonds so involved in threads and communicating with those who have so many concerns. He strongly supports HubPro, yet is open to concerns and suggestions. I truly admire him for that.
And I admire hubbers who are able to express those concerns directly to Paul in mature and positive ways.
Am glad you posted this. It is always helpful to think of how we can all get out of whatever fire there is rather than escalating it. I think it is part of a healthy community discussion to have some airing out.
Face it, wrong is wrong is wrong. What was done to that hub, we all know about, was wrong, beyond wrong. The HP procedures were apparently never followed. The total rewrite of that hub, has been completed and has continued to be locked for weeks.
If people can be hired as editors without the credentials, then I suggest those who want to do the flag waving, start sending a me next, me next,, I can't wait to have unqualified people destroy my work.
We had flag wavers, happy dancers, at Squidoo too, but they got tossed along with everyone else.
I haven't read thoroughly the threads/hubs referred to, just browsed enough of both to see what was discussed. I think valid points can be made without dragging people through the trenches.
I hope that the future edits will be done according to the stated policy.
While I understand not spending valuable time on editing hubs that don't receive a lot of traffic, I hope that very careful consideration and current SEO knowledge is implemented while editing a high traffic hub. Only after the author consents and agrees with the final edit should it be published.
I think it is a pretty small issue on the scale of all of Hubpages and all the people who write here.
I guess that I missed all the excitement. I think we are all just trying to get by and it is indeed a trying time on the Internet at the moment. Things always settle down after a bit so I don't worry too much. Best just to keep plodding along doing whatever it is that you feel is best. If you panic and get too crazy it really does not help any situation out.
by Scott S Bateman 19 months ago
I reported someone on Monday for calling another poster an idiot. Five days later, it's still there. Now I see the following post:"Now that's funny, you a severely biased spewer of fake news stories "found them to be free of bias in all cases" ? lol You wouldn't know the difference...
by Juliette Kando FI Chor 4 years ago
There have been so may forum threads and posts (some quite offensive to HOD authors), that I would suggest the HOD should be selected by readers votes.Under the "useful, funny, etc." chain, a link: "Vote" would allow a reader to vote for the hub as HOD.The hub that...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter 5 years ago
Why can't people on Hubpages disagree without attacking others?Opposing positions can lead to a better understanding. Personal attacks say a lot about the commenters' inability to discuss a matter intelligently.
by Kylyssa Shay 21 months ago
I seldom use the forum because I frequently get treated with a condescending attitude or bashed no matter what I ask or say. For instance, the last time I used the forum, a long-time user decided to argue against my desire for hubscores to reflect the eligibility of hubs for the network sites by...
by Maddie Ruud 8 years ago
There's been a lot of discussion of forum rules and policies recently, as well as criticism of the HubPages staff, so Paul and I agreed that a thread reiterating our position was in order.The rules are very clear:No personal attacks in the forums. Substantive debate and differences of opinion...
by Person of Interest 2 years ago
And why?http://hubpages.com/about/teamFor the purposes of this thread, consider them all single. Hopefully, the respective spouses will let me live. Consider yourself single for the purposes of this thread as well.As for me, I'm still contemplating.Humorous responses are also welcome.Negative...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|