After reading the forums about using wide capsules and carefully captioning each one, I went back yesterday to the first four or five hubs I published and upgraded them. I widened the first photo, where possible, and wrote a more pertinent caption, and did the same with all the other photos where possible. The results shocked me. While these articles do not get huge daily views, every single one increased.in views, some significantly. For example, one article that has been lingering for quite awhile with very few daily views, got 37 of them yesterday. I don't know whether this is just a coincidence, but I do know my articles look better and are more enticing with that first photo wide and at the top of the page. For a long time I thought doing this would block Google ads, but since the structure of our hubs has changed, it appears the pix do not get in their way. I do wonder, though, about not having enough above the fold content when I do this. I have heard that the caption should be enough, but is it? Would love to get some feedback on this.
One thing many writers overlook is that photos are content.
I have been going to wide-view photos at the top & it does look better.
Then, I have been adding the title of the hub in the photo caption.
(As suggested on the HP blog to improve hubs.)
Unfortunately, I am not seeing a surge of views like you have.
I suddenly realized that I have been a bit too casual with the way I do my photos, especially the captioning. If this little experiment had been with just one hub, no big deal...but with several, I see a pattern. I was just reading some articles that discussed the "above the fold" issue and most seem to agree that this kind of thinking is outdated due to the advent of numerous types of devices. So, guess I have some work to do lol!
That's great to hear, TT. Photos are content, so a great eye-catching photo can do the work of enticing the user to continue reading/scrolling. We know that many users only browse a page unless the text is written in such a way to fully engage the viewer. Great photos and captions can make a huge difference. I think with certain topics the top photo can make the difference of whether a user stays or clicks away.
I've updated some of my hubs to full width, but not all of them. But each one that I've updated has seen an increase in traffic. At first I was hesitant, especially because my hubber score went below 85, but now I like the way the page looks and it seems to work better, and my score increased. I'm sure part of it are the photos and the page being more mobile appealing.
I'm sure certain topics bring in more photo image searches than others.
Another benefit I'm finding is that taking more time with photos and captioning is bringing in more Pinterest views! It is very tedious to upgrade this way, but I think doing it might really pay off. I wish HP had updated our financials and stats the past few days so I could see if my latest updates also are increasing views.
Thanks so much for taking the time to share your results with us.
That is an interesting experiment. I will try that later.
Thanks for sharing TT. I have also asked this question about full vs. half-width images on the SEO subreddit, Quora and in a couple of Google Plus communities to see what the latest thinking is. I will report back here anything that I find out.
Thanks, Paul. It is beginning to look like the old "above the fold" thinking is coming to an end. The articles I looked at, one of which was from Moz, seem to support that thinking and say it is due to the fact that people now read on such a large variety of devices. Please do let me know what you find out. Thanks.
Content "Above the fold" is still important but it seems that a captioned photo now counts as content. As we've discussed, the key is that the photo and caption need to answer the search query.
It will be more interesting to see if the traffic "bump" continues or dies out. HP features new (or newly edited) hubs as they come through the QAP process and that usually produces a bump in traffic. I've done the same thing you have (but with 50 hubs at once) and my traffic is the highest it's been in months - with the increase all from HP. It is already dying out, too (hard to be sure because the weekend always shows fewer views), just as expected.
I suggest telling the story in the captions. You can achieve the best of both worlds - images in a half-size capsule to the right for non-mobiles, and images which work on mobiles when displayed at full size by having informative and carefully constructed captions. Also remember that the photos stand alone on Pinterest and so the captions should be enticing and encourage viewers to want to get more from the article. I don't like defacing great images with text - Yuck! It is all about the captions. On mobiles users will see an image, read the informative captions that tell a story and move on to the next one. That's my approach.
Easy to say but hard to do. I also do not like putting text on photos, but for Pinterest this is a "must". I think telling the story in photos would take lots of them, and for my niche, they are hard to come by. I try to tell the story in my text capsule headings and then support as much as possible with the photos. If you can do all this, terrific...I don't know if I can.
Thank you TIMETRAVELER2 for this photo post!!! I had no idea that placing the picture first (you do mean absolutely first, right?) would help traffic. I've already changed two of my Hubs & you are so right, it really does look better.
Yes, I do mean first. So, you have your title, your summary, your made for Pinterest photo (a great photo with appropriate text on it that, if possible, perks interest, a caption that refers to or repeats the title, the photo credit...and then you start writing.
I'm still working on this but am seeing lots of red arrows as I go. At the very least it is increasing my Hubber score, which I think is important.
Take a look at a few of my hubs to see what I am talking about. If you don't see a photo first, I have not updated it yet!
by Paul Edmondson 6 years ago
We've been talking about leading photos in the forums and while it's not just about having a leading photo, it's about having a really great leading photo. We recommend this because we see these photos get shared a disproportionately number of times higher.The quote of the day "People...
by Carolee Samuda 6 years ago
According to Site Pro News, these are 18 things that may be affecting organic traffic since the first Panda update in February last year. Some of these terms I do not understand so it would be helpful if we discuss these issues. 1. Duplicate content2. Keyword stuffing3. Doorways4. Footer links5....
by billd01603 5 years ago
According to Google Analytics, I got 92 pageviews last Monday and earned .32. Yesterday I got 161 pageviews and earned only .20. Why the discrepancy?
by Yvonne Spence 6 years ago
In line with advice a few months ago, I changed the layout of several hubs so that the top part contains a full-size photograph, and layout almost all my new hubs this way. (Studies suggest this is what readers find most attractive and so are likely to read on.) However, I have read several times...
by Liz Elias 6 years ago
Sorry, folks--this is getting old for me, too.Ok, today's problem is with my first photo on my current in-progress hub,(actually a sketch I did). There are internal captions within the sketch, and no matter how much I tried to 'stretch' the text capsule with extra words, (and yes, added...
by Eugene Brennan 2 months ago
I just noticed that traffic to my article on how to grow willow has surged over the last few days. However it seems that the reason could be a featured snippet which has extracted captions from the photos and turned them into a series of steps. However it seems to be a pointless effort on behalf of...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|