I'd have laughed in the face of anybody posting this question. Of course it's not enough. You're idle, that's not good enough. No way. Breaks the rules. Dumb farquer - what ARE you thinking? Go away and write more you moron.
All valid responses....? And more....
Yet I've been "Hub Pro'd" - and they've taken my hub from a 600 word "masterpiece" (well, it was working), to a 255 word hub. I can also see no image attribution for the photos that have appeared by magic
Is this what I should be emulating as my template for success?
If so I can bang those out all day ...... !!
Now, I don't wish to "undo" it, if the professionals believe they've constructed a huge hit .... but it does make you wonder.
Maybe my Tip of the Day should be: tear up the rulebook folks, this is easy!
So which Rule Book do we tear up This Weeks v2 or Last Weeks v3?
Oh my what is the world coming to ?
I did read somewhere from an official source that lack of attribution on images does not mean that a Hub cannot be awarded a HOTD ?
I think the Hub answers the question, although I think we should have added a section on why it's not safe to reheat chicken more than once. Maybe you can add that bit; personally, I'd like to know! Your Hub gets most of its traffic from the keyword "reheating chicken". I think we should have changed your title to "How to Safely Reheat Cooked Chicken". I'd suggest doing that. Let me know if you would like us to take a second pass at editing the Hub. Editing is a process, and I appreciate you looking at your Hub and evaluating it. We'd love to work together with Hubbers to get it right!
The photos were commissioned by HubPages photographers, so we don't need to attribute them. I hope you like them!
Do let us know the effect on your traffic to that Hub.
You've now got 10 H2 Tags on a 255-word Hub. Not good.
In addition, you have five images without Alt Tags.
http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/130692? … ost2735826
Your Hub is now in violation of Google Webmaster Guidelines. I predict your traffic will fall in a couple of weeks.
There is a typo in the quote at the end. You can add at least one more word in perfect safety.
It will be interesting to see how your Hub does from here out.
I'd be even more interested in hearing about the thought process that led the editor to think that 255 words is an acceptable mark. Is there a new case study they should be sharing with the community?
Otherwise, just about every piece of reputable advice I've read over the past several years suggests that articles with a much, much higher word count tend to rank better on average.
The last thing we need is for the HP community at large to start pushing out 250-word Hubs.
I will, of course, be checking the stats ... but it was "doing all right" before they upped its game. So, it'll probably be subjective whether any changes/improvements are to be attributed to the re-write, or if it'd have done better as it was.
I think I will "rob" my old copy and bung it on my own page/s elsewhere. Shame to waste all the hours of time I've spent writing that, finding the images, watching it, tweaking it over the years.
Talk about striking gold if that works out well. I always thought it needed to be 1500+ words to generate decent traffic.
I used to sweat over hubs - and haven't written any for many months (years?) as it's so daunting.
I will have to reappraise my attitude and approach to writing and see if I have been "missing the point" all along
Nothing noticeable stats-wise so far.... *twiddles thumbs* ... actually, I shouldn't do that. The amount I make wouldn't cover the cost of the band-aid/plaster required for a sore thumb!
If you enjoy your subject, you'd end up with 2500 words easy. The idea on how to write all this is to babble on about every thought about the topic, then edit it to make it sound professional.
It's more fun doing it this way than worrying about word counts!
I find this particularly interesting and will be keen to know if the traffic on this hub takes a dive or remains steady.
We were encouraged en masse to produce lots of shorter style articles on Squidoo in the run up to its demise. They did not work and attracted almost no search traffic at all. I know they were pretty much a complete failure from talking to many other writers as well. This is hardly surprising since, as you'd expect, it normally takes a lot more than a mere 255 words to explore a topic properly.
It didn't work on Squidoo and shorter blurbs haven't worked long term on other sites either. I'm not just talking about working with search engines since some of these websites also get labeled as spammy and banned on social media like Pinterest.
I'd be amazed if this new style took off on Hubpages. Would 255 length hubs even remain featured if not edited by a professional? I'm not going to be trying it anyway.
Geez, and I posted an 800 word hub yesterday and thought I was pushing the limits on short length. I too will be very interested in how that works. For some things I can definitely see a "less is more" approach to be the best, where other subjects demand more detail. I personally think that drawing out something that could be short and sweet can also be seen as "spammy" or gaming the system, especially if you end up being repetitive.
Like anything else, I think there is no one size fits all approach to great content. This definitely piques my curiosity though, so definitely going to follow along and see where it leads .
Is it a poem? A flash story? You should have at least 750 words. A normal Hub needs 1150 words to begin with. Add photos, etc. and see how many words that you have, then you have less to write.
Just get excited about the subject, write heaps of whatever brain dribble you have, then edit and polish to professionalism! I often write 2500 word hubs that way, with almost no effort because I am soooo excited about the subject and want to share my opinions (though these get dumbed down in the edit).
In most cases, longer, in-depth Hubs do better. However, we don't think you should add fluff just to achieve word count. We recommend building out your topic and providing your reader with all of the information that they will need around the topic. I agree, we probably could have figured out how to add a bit of content to this Hub, but it would be hard to write 1200 words on this topic. We also think that photos are an important piece of the content. The original photos in earners Hub add a lot of value. We are also starting to commission infographics now in HubPro which is really exciting. We are thinking about photos/illustrations as content and not just a supplemental piece.
Looking at this particular Hub and the attractive use of photos and the Classic callout option surrounding important information about reheating chicken, I think it could go viral on mobile - maybe on Pinterest. I'll post it.
I think Infographics are big news on Pinterest as well.
I agree with the ones who believe that the long articles do better. I can see it in the numbers.
I have always thought that more words are not always better. It depends on the words. If I take a 1000 page article and edit it down to 500 words, I often feel like I have made it better, distilling it to its essence.
On the other hand, if I take a 500 word article and stretch it to 1000 words, just for the sake of word count, I rarely feel like it is an improvement.
Shorter articles are not always the easy way though, fewer words does not always mean less work.
HP has not usually supported this view though.
I don't know ....looking quickly at the stats graph there was a very noticeable drop in the first instance (probably when I first moaned in this post), it's since gone up to where it was before.
CBA to load up Analytics right now to ponder an accurate answer to that.
I would hold onto the content that was taken out and save it for updates if the hub does not perform as well as it did or as hoped it might. Best wishes, I hope it does well and puts even more money in the bank for you. I am interested in knowing how things go too.
I just checked the Hubpages' provided stats again and the graph is showing that it's slumped again, so no real noticeable difference at all so far.
by Dr. John Anderson 8 years ago
To meet the 'quality' standard to avoid hubs getting sleepy ZZZd just follow these rules:=> A minimum of 1500 words of truly informative, well-written, useful content => A minimum of 5 relevant, high-resolution, properly-attributed photos (ideally your own) => 2 videos (ideally your own)...
by Thomas Byers 9 years ago
A lot of people fail to see how important research can be. Below is a list of the most popular niches. Make Money or Save Money* Debt* Insurance* Credit cards* Loans* And many moreSelf DevelopmentSpiritual/SupernaturalInformation Technology (IT)Online shoppingHealth And...
by Carolee Samuda 8 years ago
I was hub hopping and had to flag a few hubs for being substandard (word count). One hub had exactly 10 words and 2 photos. There should be a way the system prevents you from publishing a hub like that except if it's in the poetry section.
by Dan Harmon 10 years ago
Along with the Google effect lately I've seen a lot of forum posts about spam, and every time I hub hop it is obvious that there is a lot submitted here of both spam and simply substandard hubs.I would suggest that the following rules apply to the first 5 (or 10 or 20?) hubs by any new...
by Ginny 9 years ago
I thought the new article http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/Elem … tellar-Hub change the way you write articles?It will for me. I have been trying to write longer and more thoroughly researched articles, but this advisory really hit home. What about you? Does it...
by Susannah Birch 5 years ago
An ongoing topic I've seen over the years I've been on Hubpages is "How do I make my low traffic hubs better."I saw it again today in a Hub Pro thread (if you haven't already, should definitely opt in - it was a fantastic experience.)My best advice to anyone who is writing online is:If it...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|