Which of these two intro images is more appealing and why?
I just had my hub edited by HubPro. I think it's just nerves making me think the new photos are not as attractive as the ones pinned tens of thousands of times on Pinterest, but I'd like to ask others if they find the new ones just as "Pinterest-worthy" as the old ones.
I'm not going to identify which is which.
I liked the first one right away, not so junky looking and scarier.
The one with the off white background is better.
Sorry, I didn't give you the "why". The first one is clearer and cleaner, looks like a pretty high quality camera was used; or better photo shopping; the color is brighter and there's a symmetry to the layout of image and text. Also, the font looks better. I also agree that the bordering on the second image is distracting.
I prefer the first. I think the second is just a bit too much..but that's probably just my preference.
I like the first one better. It's cleaner; I find the text in the second one where it bleeds over the border distracting.
From a graphical viewpoint, I find the first one aesthetically more pleasing (if a bloody handprint can be aesthetically pleasing, LOL!), because it is far less cluttered. I also consider the wording on the first image to be more informative.
I like the first one because it's clearer to me it's a Halloween-themed decoration. I hope.
The first reads better both in text and image. The border and background elements in the second one are distracting and do not help.
Neither - both images could be improved. But stick with the first one if pinned
The second one was pinned, the first is the HubPro replacement. I guess I'll stick with the HubPro version, though, until I can make the craft again and get better photos.
That is really interesting. My traffic from my highest trafficked hub is also more from Pinterest than from Google. I often wondered what would happen if they were HubPro'd especially with the the pinned image.
Did they suggest that you keep the original image somewhere in the hub or take it out entirely? Personally, I would keep it somehow near the conclusion, so that if people did come to the hub through that pin, they would at least know they were on the right page and didn't get gypped. And that way, if it is the image that is pulling people in, they can still keep on pinning that image.
Please do let us know how the traffic does on it.
The original photos of the craft and all its steps were all removed as sub-standard. Multiple photos from it had been pinned, but mostly the photo of it on the mirror.
I need to remake the craft and re-take photos pretty quickly because it no longer shows an example of what the craft looks like if made exactly according to the instructions. The HubPro version is missing the center of the palm clearance that the original and commercial versions of similar decorations have.
I know this seems like knit-picking, but it has gotten hundreds of thousands of views as it originally was because people liked the craft project and the craft project results look different now if one looks at the photos.
If the hub is about Halloween decorations, the first. If it is about making window clings, the second (although I'm not enamored with the verbiage).
Simple and clear is always better.
But what you really need is a good clean of your windows!
I think they both have readability issues, but the design of the first one is better.
I like the first one better too. The second one looks like it is in a box or something and makes it confusing. There is also a shadow which is also confusing. The first one is simple and clear, and the dripping paint looks like dripping blood. It is also clearer and easy to see what it is about.
First one: cleaner design that's more eye-catching and easy to read. The second looks rather dated in design, too many effects that obscure the message and looks, honestly, a bit cheesy by today's standards.
I like the first photo. Not too much going on but cleaner & more appealing.
Thanks for all the replies. I'll keep the HubPro version until I have a chance to make the craft again and get a better photo to use.
What I've gotten from this thread:
It's better to get a new photo than to try to make an older, lower-resolution, square photo work as a rectangular Pinterest image, despite success of an image on Pinterest.
Photos of this craft in actual use on windows or mirrors probably do not make the best photos, a non-reflective, non-translucent background is best in this case.
Readability is an issue for both photos. I need to take a clearer photo and ad text that's more visible and not so close to the bloody bits.
The appearance of the finished craft doesn't really matter, only the arrangement of the elements in the photo do.
Things that get popular on Pinterest aren't necessarily good.
by Faith Reaper 6 years ago
In a recent HubPages weekly email, it was discussing the fact that many use photos and do not provide a source. I was thinking that this may easily be addressed by HP by requiring a source in the source field inside the photo capsule, whether it is "self" or the Freedigitalphotos,...
by Dr Mark 3 years ago
In looking over my edited hubs, I find many inconsistencies. Some hubs will be changed so that all large photos are seen (for mobile viewers?), others will be changed into thumbnails, others not changed at all. Some photos are moved above the text capsule, others below. What does HP now consider to...
by Will Apse 3 years ago
Long, long ago, it was easy to write a hub. This is what I did:Spent two days producing 1500 words or so. Got the page about 80 percent right. Published it.After a couple of weeks, if the visitors started coming from the search engines, I would put in a few more hours editing and improving. The...
by Deb Kingsbury 3 years ago
I'm very disappointed in HubPages. Yes, I know ... I know ... we cannot opt out of their HubPro Basic program. And it's their site. Yadda, yadda, yadda--I get it. But that doesn't mean I'm not very upset. Make that pissed. I received one of those heads up emails, warning me that an unnamed hub of...
by awordlover 6 years ago
Do you work on your "unfeatured" hubs to improve them? Or let them stay unfeatured?On your hub list, when you see the message "This hub is not featured because it doesn't receive sufficient engagement" next to one of your hubs, are you likely to revamp the hub to try to get it...
by Jess B 7 months ago
Hi fellow hubbers! I’m wanting to see what you all do in this case. I’m wanting to improve some of my articles that I have already written. Do you find that it helps their score and traffic when you do edit them? Does it really help or do you think it’s just best sometimes to start over completely...
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|