I am a serial offender in the unprofessional use of HP forums so you can trust me on this issue.
This is mainly to apologize to staff for my own contribution to the recent announcement of niche sites.
The failure of the switch to categories from sub-domains has taken its toll and that led me to be less enthusiastic than I should have been,
I think if the original post form HP had said something like:
'We are going to trial some new niche sites over the coming weeks. If they are successful we will report back.'
Then I would have said great idea, never give up!
The rather nebulous nature of the information actually given and the uncertainty concerning which pages would move, where and when left me feeling ill-used.
But that is not a real excuse. So apologies...
I agree with your wording of the announcement of new niche sites. But, I do not see any problem regarding switch off to categories from sub-domains. Can you elaborate the allegations regarding this, so that I can also come to know of the problems and failures?
I think long enough has passed to say that the switch to categories from subs did not help traffic. In fact, there has been a downturn.
Nothing wrong with trying something new but you need a little success to keep your spirits up.
May be or may not be. But, I don't blame Hubpages for any downturn to be the result of switching to categories. May be other factors are there. It is a normal case of ups and downs in traffic as far as I see it.
That post was meant to 100 per cent sincere, but I could see when I reread it that I hadn't got around to forgiving them for the bio thing.
Who takes bios from an unknown site seriously?
Some guy could be a convicted murderer and honestly tell you that he has 'extensive experience with the justice system'.
As for someone who takes his cat to the vets to be neutered and describes the ordeal and what he learnt from it, what should he say?
"I have a cat and brain enough to record events".
To be honest, I haven't been doing too badly recently (I have eleven accounts and it's a mixed bag, but I'm talking overall) - so I am currently wary of changes. Change can sometimes result in drops as well as success.
The effects of uncertainty also make me reluctant to do too much editing or creation of new hubs until I can see what the new lay of the land is going to look like.
Moving material to other sites will also give HP the opportunity to "leave behind" some of the hubs they consider inferior. So I hope my best stuff gets picked, because it may well open up a dumping ground and I'd hate to be stuck in there!
I've always had a general faith in HP's competence, vision, and professionalism and intend to keep that. But I must confess that I'm a little anxious as to whether and how I will fit in with the new order of things.
Maybe I am devious in my thinking, but it also occurred to me that it would be a good time for HP to move poor quality hubs away and put them out to pasture somewhere where they couldn't do any harm! Maybe that's why they're being a little quiet/vague?
I know HP staff are invested in the site. But some of us hubbers have given a lot of time and effort too over the years. Some of the hubs that are bearing fruit now are ones that I wrote 9 months ago or more. You always have to think long term, there's no quick bucks in this game!
I know the internet is constantly changing, but I like an idea of what's happening so's I can plan.
"Moving material to other sites will also give HP the opportunity to "leave behind" some of the hubs they consider inferior. "...I think this may be one of the underlying reasons for making this change. It has been an overwhelming task for them to find and dump bad articles, and yet they persist.
As Paul said, the new sites will start "clean", which means they will be able to control what goes into it (assuming they vet every single article before moving anything).
Once the task is completed, I'm guessing the people with garbage will lose ranking and leave. When the ashes settle, good hubs that did not make it to the new sites will have less competition and may have fewer garbage hubs to harm them.
If this does not happen, then the original HP site likely will fail.
On the other hand, those garbage hubs will be much easier for the team to find and dump.
I'm hoping for the best, and by the way, I don't think an apology was necessary. Many of us are nervous about this change and right now are sitting in limbo due to a lack of information about exactly how niche site hubs will be chosen and which categories will be used.
As a professional unprofessional, it has been my experience the unprofessional gets the most ad revenue generating traffic. My posts alone paid for the Jacuzzi installed at HQ last month.
I can't wait until my Jacuzzi comes in the mail from writing at Hubpages. GOALS.
Well, anything to clean those butts off our hubs. When is this supposed to happen?
by John D Wilson 2 years ago
The chart showed a loss of about 55% of the traffic on Hubpages in the last 6 months.I also looked at the traffic trends on some of the niche sites, and they don't seem to be making up for the loss.In fact the bounce rate seemed higher than that of Hubpages.What are the old timers thoughts about...
by Sondra Rochelle 2 years ago
Many of us here are working hard to upgrade our hubs so that they can be moved to the niche sites. I think it would be a good idea if those upgrades are viewed by the team the same way as new posts so that they can more quickly addressed. It's a shame to let much better upgraded...
by Missing Link 14 months ago
I'm thinking the answer is probably yes?If you have hubs that have been deemed "not featured", for one reason or another, will that factor into lowering your overall score/rating as a HubPages member? Example--let's say your overall rating is 75. If 10 non featured hubs become...
by Abigail Hreha 115 minutes ago
Anyone know which are the highest and lowest traffic niche sites? From my own stats I’m seeing ToughNickel and Bellatory do pretty well while Letterpile and Delishably get much less traffic, though it could just be me.
by Scott S Bateman 2 years ago
I'm very happy with the results of the niche sites. It's a win-win for HubPages and writers like myself. But I'm a bit curious about the process for choosing Hubs that go on those sites.One of my most successful Hubs on a niche site has more than 1,250 words, multiple photos and an original video....
by Sondra Rochelle 3 years ago
I know a lot of you are curious about how the niche sites are doing. Recently, 21 of my articles were moved over. Some were edited, some were not. Most did not have ads, but of the ones that did, some were left in place, others were converted to in text links to products.I've been...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|