Is it all about views or does something else come into the mix?
If you have had one or more, could you shed a little light on this, please.
My best performing hub was edited. It had few products, but all were removed from the article. Makes no sense to me as it has more than 2200 words and consistently generates high traffic from different sources including Google. I wrote it more than 8 years ago and regularly update it. It's evergreen, but not earning me or HP much.
Not writing anything new and did not request the HubPro edit.
Were they high scoring hubs or are all the hubs moving to the new site being edited?
Mine that got selected to pethelpful did not get any edits.
Was it something which was written especially for the new niche site?
The latest one yes. However, the other two were done before news of niche sites.
Do you think that the number of view was taken into consideration or were the hubs selected for the subject matter?
My understanding is the team edited the hubs that had the most views.
Now, they are reviewing hubs that are moving to new sites. I presume they are still moving the ones with the highest views first, but they might be looking over all of them to make sure they fit the criteria for moving them.
I could be remembering incorrectly, but I believe HP has chosen not to divulge that information. IIRC, Christy at some point stated that there is no across-the-board magic number. I think she said it varies from topic to topic. Sorry, I don't have a link to that statement.
Hi Sally. Here is a link that will explain the decision process:
http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/Comm … d_37950506
Edit: I am sorry. That is the link to Editor's Choice. My mind was not intact at that moment.
That's the explanation for how they pick Editor's Choice hubs, not hubs to be edited by HupPro.
Here is the link to the HP Blog (scroll down to HubPro info)
It was a little reassuring to read that again, thank you.
I think I am suffering from deep insecurity. After having spent three years and thousands of hours writing in a niche site I feel deeply concerned that my hubs may never get selected for a 'niche site' especially after having been told that staff had edited just over 3000 Hubs which account for 41% of search traffic, I wonder why HubPages would want to keep the current site going at all with Hubs which were not earning them any money. I can't stand the thought that I had put in so much of my time to have my work, not to be included. This is when I start to question whether I should begin gradually moving my work to my own site. I can't be the only writer here is feeling insecure and thinking the same thing.
I am sure your hubs will be a welcome addition to a new niche site, Sally.
When HP goes through transitions like this it has a great effect on all of us, causing stress and feelings of insecurity. I am debating on what to do. Usually I just flow with changes and do my best to stay in balance, but this is a really big change we are facing and not a very comfortable one.
They may not be disclosing their method of choosing articles, but given their objective is to create new sites that "please Google", they are obviously going to pick the ones that get the most Google traffic first. Where they have a shortage of Hubs in a particular category, they then choose some lower-trafficked Hubs to fill the gaps.
So, when it comes to creating the Crafts niche site, I'd say your Hubs would be in with an excellent chance of being chosen to represent wet felting.
Like you, I am pessimistic about what will happen to the main site after all the niche sites have been created. Niche sites are being created because the main site is failing - how much worse will it perform when all the best articles have been removed? And in that case, why would you bother maintaining it?
However, I am not moving any Hubs elsewhere. I have my two specialist dance sites and I'm not interested in running another one - and besides, I don't have enough material on any of my other topics to make it worthwhile. The earnings potential of other writing sites is not sufficient to be worth the effort of moving stuff. I am just going to wait it out!
I am going to adopt the same attitude as you and wait to see what transpires. I do make fairly regular payments here so staying would be a much better option for me. I really don't have the time or the inclination to work on moving the material to my own site.
I have had two articles put through HubPro editing. The first just had an ad removed, and then it was transferred to a new niche site. The second is presumably being edited for transfer to the same niche site, but it has been in editing for over a week now, and currently it looks horrible! All that has been changed is formatting (bigger headers, moving video capsules around), but photos are now oversized and many of the video capsules in the article have been duplicated multiple times, so the videos randomly appear two or three times throughout the article. You can't edit your own article while it is being edited by HubPro, so it has been in this editing limbo hell now for some time...
I have yet to be edited by HubPro. I am sorry to hear that your experience has thus far not been a good one.
This would be unacceptable to me. I would write to the editor and/or Robin to politely let them know. In my opinion, Hubs should be presentable at all times while they are published, and editing should be in small batches if it can't be done all at once.
I've just received notice of more of my hubs being selected for HubPro. They might as well have shipped me a flashing neon sign as to what one of the future niche sites will be, but I won't tell.
I don't think so, note your profile score of 97 versus my 88.
We are told to pay no attention to profile scores - apparently they mean nothing:)
I was in the low 90's for a long, long time.
I have now been in the medium to high 80's for a long, long time.
This saddens me and makes me periodically break out my security blanket.
I really hate those scores, this is precisely what I think they are designed to do. I don't think they are a good idea as I am sure it confuses readers who I am sure must avoid low scores, after all who wants to read something which is not rated high. Makes no sense at all, best to do away with them altogether. There should be no need to have them when everything is moved over to the niche sites - as all the material should be top notch if it has been preselected.
Oh come on, give us a hint. Just a tiny little one.
I see they took a point away from both of us, tough town around here.
I had Hubs go through the Pro Edit. It was great. They were chosen by traffic. I had a lot of others go through snip editing.
Since having my Hubs go to the niche site (PetHelpful), my total Google views are up at least 1/3 overall - including Hubs not on the niche site or on other topics. I think if all of my Hubs went to niche sites, I would be seeing at least a 50 percent increase in Google traffic.
I also suspect they are choosing Hubs to fill in topics as suggested before. Some ;lower traffic Hubs may get edited and go over to a niche site because they fill a topic that has few Hubs from which to choose.
If I were you, I would definitely wait for your topic's niche site to come around. The uptick in views will be worth it. Don't worry. You will have Hubs chosen.
Does anyone know how I can stop my hubs from being edited by HubPro? I checked my account settings on my profile and I have the "My Hubs are eligible to be edited with HubPro Premium" set to "no" and yet when I checked my Hubs, one of them had the HubPro symbol beside it, indicating that it had been edited. How come my hub still got edited when I already said no to HubPro? Is there something else I need to do so my hubs won't be edited by HubPro?
I don't think there is a choice anymore, you may be able to change the hub back to a former state.
There is no way to stop it, but once it (finally!) exits the editing process, you can make your own changes to the article again, so you should be able to return it to its original state.
As I understand it, this is so though I am not sure about hubs which have been moved to Niche Sites.
by Dr Abby Campbell 5 years ago
On Sunday, I noticed that many of my hubs made the Editor's Choice list. Though I was pleased, I noticed that my views had fallen somewhat. I figured it would take a few days for views to increase since my hubs are no longer on my subdomain but on the main HP domain. However, I checked on my...
by Beth Eaglescliffe 5 years ago
I was really excited when some of my hubs were awarded Editor's Choice, but it seemed to make little difference to number of page views to those hubs. However, getting two HOTD has been great! One of my HOTD was also an Editor's Choice and one wasn't. Both got huge spikes in views from HP but not a...
by Kylyssa Shay 2 years ago
I've noticed that I keep seeing HOTDs that fit the niche sites yet weren't chosen for the niche sites because they still have HubPages URLs. Why not save some time in the selection process for the niche sites and mine all the recent HOTDs and all of the Editor's Choice hubs for use on the niche...
by Kat McAdams 5 years ago
I had a hub that was receiving around 1,300-1,500 views per day. It was chosen as Editor's Choice. It then dropped by about 1,000 views per day. I opted out of the program, but that hub is no longer showing in Google for the keywords that brought it all the traffic before EC messed it up. How can I...
by Donna Herron 5 years ago
I know there's been a lot of discussion on the forums about the Editor's Choice hubs. First, I want to say that I really appreciate all the hard work and creativity that the HP staff put into our community, but I guess I just don't understand the idea behind the Editor's Choice hubs. I...
by Catherine Giordano 4 years ago
My "Inside the Beehive" hub just got the "Editor's Choice" award. After reading the posts about Editor's Choice, I feel like it is like getting the key to the city. It is a great honor, but it's not good for any thing. It doesn't even show up on my profile...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|