PORN?

1. 57

   Mrvoodooposted 13 years ago

   Firstly let me make it clear that I'm not complaining about this hub, personally I quite like it.
   
   <no links please>
   
   But I know that both HubPages and Google have rules against porn, and this is nothing you couldn't see inside many English papers and magazines but I was just curious as to whether other hubbers considered this to be porn or arty pictures?
   
   So the question is, 'porn' or 'not porn'? (you decide)
   
   * and yes I know the issue of these gallery's comes up often, and if you don't like it you can ignore it or flag them (I have done neither) this hub shows no nipples or ladies bits, but does that mean it isn't porn?

   replyreport
2. 61

   Colebabieposted 13 years ago

   I see areola!

   replyreport
   1. 57

      Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Definitely a little glimpse of, lol, and blatant ass cheeks (I've bookmarked it) haha
      
      But is it porn?

      replyreport
      1. 61

         Colebabieposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         No, I've seen porn, and that's not porn.

         replyreport
3. 60

   tantrumposted 13 years ago

   Where's the porn in there?? I only see a beautiful woman !

   replyreport
4. 64

   Mishaposted 13 years ago

   not

   replyreport
5. 39

   vancouverposted 13 years ago

   I think with the way society has evolved today , this would not really be considered porn. Flip to A&E on a friday night and you will see more.

   replyreport
6. 70

   Ladybird33posted 13 years ago

   I don't think so...I have seen much worse on here...

   replyreport
7. 57

   Mrvoodooposted 13 years ago

   So what would make it porn?
   
   Nipples?
   
   Lady bits?
   
   Spit-roast?
   
   Donkey?
   
   Just curious as to where the invisible line lies.
   
   

   replyreport
8. 61

   Colebabieposted 13 years ago

   Well I may have a different definition than HP or Google.

   replyreport
   1. 57

      Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      That was pretty much my point, I'm no anti-porn crusader, hell my drawers won't close for porn, my palms are too hairy to hide and I'm seriously worried about going blind, lol
      
      I'm thinking that maybe 20-30 years ago this might have been considered porn? These days it ain't porn unless it's 20 guys, one woman, and a power-drill with a dildo stuck on the end.
      
      Guess I was just feeling silly and curious as to how others felt, lol.

      replyreport
9. 64

   Mishaposted 13 years ago

   Ummm, you just gave me an idea....
   
   
   

   replyreport
   1. 57

      Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      lol, dildo and drill right?
      
      I see this thread getting closed right about............ now.

      replyreport
10. 0

    fierycjposted 13 years ago

    Dude, there must be like a million hubs of the nature in here! Just check the Bollywood 'AUNTIE' hubs! What's new!

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Nothing new dude, although most of those 'auntie' hubs tend to be bikini based (and pretty grim), like I said I'm not complaining, just wondered where the line was (for Google mainly).
       
       I'm thinking of making some myself (joke)

       replyreport
11. 61

    Colebabieposted 13 years ago

    Well 20-30 years ago there was porn. Bushes bushes everywhere! But porn. Like I said, this (to me anyway) isn't porn. Porn is sexually explicit, like simulating (or doing) a sex act.
    
    
    
    Bikini, even nude pictures of women isn't porn to me. But I understand HP/Google has to draw the line somewhere, so often that includes nudity.

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       'It's a jungle in there'
       
       Cool pic, I probably should have said further back than 20-30 years, is a woman down on her hands and knees sticking her ass up in the air simulating a sexual act?  not really a natural position for much else, lol
       
       Think I'll go do a little research to see if Google themselves state where the invisible line lies.

       replyreport
12. 0

    Leta Sposted 13 years ago

    Wow...lots of porn postings lately.  Hey, cool.  It's better than some of the stuff in the Glen Beck threads about rifle killing and such. 
    
     
    
    Carry on.

    replyreport
13. 61

    Colebabieposted 13 years ago

    Well that pic is from the 50s. And the position you described I've done in yoga

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       I knew I should have taken up Yoga.

       replyreport
14. 57

    Mrvoodooposted 13 years ago

    Just in case anybody else was curious:
    
    Adult content
    
    The AdSense network is considered family-safe, which means that publishers aren't permitted to place Google ads on sites which contain adult content. In addition to photos and videos which contain nudity or sexual activities, here are some other examples of unacceptable content:
    
        * Lewd or provocative images
        * Crude or indecent language, including adult stories
        * Sexual tips or advice
        * Sexual fetish sites (e.g. foot fetish content)
        * Adult toys or products
        * Ads or links to external sites containing adult content

    replyreport
15. 73

    sunforgedposted 13 years ago

    not porn, but it is an example of someone stealing someone else art for their commercial gain
    
    no image credits, links etc.

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       OK I agree it's not porn, but is it 'Lewd or provocative images'?

       replyreport
       1. 61

          Colebabieposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Lewd can mean "lustful" so in most cases, yes
          and provocative, yes
          But it depends on what floats your boat

          replyreport
          1. 57

             Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

             lol, I'm desensitized these days, just wondered where the boundries were with Google, because the TOS does state that it's a violation to put your adsense on 'sites' with this content, not 'hubs', so technically am I breaking the Google TOS by being associated with Hubpages. 
             
             I know that's kind of far-fetched and stretching it a bit (I hope), but at the same time technically true perhaps?

             replyreport
    2. 74

       livewithrichardposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Definately adult content but not porn and definately duplicate content...lol I was distracted but I think I seen other websites marked on the pics.

       replyreport
16. 77

    mayhmongposted 13 years ago

    I hate to admit this, but its porn to me! A little too naughty there! Crap! The 7 year old almost caught me looking at it? LOL

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       From Google:
       
       'If your site has content which you wouldn't be comfortable viewing at work or with family members around, then it probably isn't an appropriate site to place Google ads upon.'
       
       Pretty much what you just said May.

       replyreport
       1. 61

          Colebabieposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Yup, makes sense.
          Except I teach sexual health to college freshman and we talk about sex all the time at work.
          
          And my family is very open and open-minded. So that doesn't apply to me, unless its actual porn (what I think porn is) Even then, they would walk by and say "i gotta try that tonight"

          replyreport
          1. 57

             Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

             I so wouldn't want your job, lol, although I guess you get used to it.
             
             Cool about your family though, mine were the opposite, lol

             replyreport
17. 83

    dohn121posted 13 years ago

    I wouldn't call it porn, mrvoodoo...Yet, I wouldn't want the kiddies looking at it, and I wouldn't want the kiddies (if I had any) watching me scoping it, just like May over here...It's neither this nor that...It's a grey, DARK grey area

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Same here dohn (looking good fella), I loves me some porn, this isn't a moral protest I'm all for variety at HP and I've got a few hubs that come close to the bone myself (in terms of sexual advice/fetish etc.).
       
       Just wondered where the Google stance lay, and now I know, guess I should have just gone and Googled it first before starting this, lol

       replyreport
18. 77

    mayhmongposted 13 years ago

    I'm glad you guys understand

    replyreport
19. 76

    AEvansposted 13 years ago

    It is an Art form it is certainly not distasteful I have pics like that of myself well my husband has them it is elegant and sexy just art, I have seen far more provocative hubs on HP. Would I allow my son to see them not at his age but there is nothing wrong with tasteful pics when they get older and a body certainly is not shameful she certainly is not butt naked, she has left some to the person's imagination. You (guys) know you are enjoying it or you wouldn't point it out. lolololo

    replyreport
    1. 57

       Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       I think you should post them and let me decide as to whether they're porn or not (I'll be honest with you)

       replyreport
       1. 76

          AEvansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          I bet you would. ((Hugs))

          replyreport
          1. 83

             dohn121posted 13 years agoin reply to this

             
             
             BTW, Thanks mrvoodoo

             replyreport
             1. 57

                Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Pleasure my friend, good to see the man behind the mask.
                
                03:30 here now, voodoo signing off (or sneaking off to watch porn) lol, night all.

                replyreport
          2. 57

             Mrvoodooposted 13 years agoin reply to this

             You knows it

             replyreport
             1. 76

                AEvansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Naughty to both you and Dohn

                replyreport
20. 61

    Lisa HWposted 13 years ago

    Even I wouldn't call that "porn" (and I have, I think, a fairly low bar when it comes to "decency").  A couple (more than the others) are pretty provocative (so I suppose I can see why someone may call them, "adult content").  Still, not all "adult content" is porn.  The pictures aren't crude.  There's no sex going on.  To me, even if they're considered, "adult", I'd rank those pictures among the "milder" of adult photos.

    replyreport
21. 67

    Ultimate Hubberposted 13 years ago

    I will reserve my judgement over this. But I am glad the lady in there is not one fat auntie, in fact a pot-bellied auntie.

    replyreport