How do you feel about having a VOTE UP button only?

Jump to Last Post 1-17 of 17 discussions (17 posts)
  1. MazioCreate profile image64
    MazioCreateposted 10 years ago

    How do you feel about having a VOTE UP button only?

    I'm all for constructive feedback for hubs, but feel the VOTE DOWN option doesn't do anything to assist a writer with content or grammatical aspects.  If you don't like the content etc then don't vote it up. It's that simple.

  2. Dale Hyde profile image83
    Dale Hydeposted 10 years ago

    That makes sense, and I agree.  However, on a bad hub that violates rules, well I will flag it and also vote it down, simply to have it low on whatever list it shows up on until it is reviewed by a mod.

    I would not use it in the context of "punishing" someone who uses bad grammar and such.

    I would like the Vote Down to remain for the reason I have shared.

  3. ChaplinSpeaks profile image94
    ChaplinSpeaksposted 10 years ago

    I have to say that I have never used the vote down button.  Like you said, if I'm not too impressed, I don't vote up.  But, then I think I did read something about HP wanting help in flagging poor content.  Still a bit of a newbie, so not sure on that.

  4. Man from Modesto profile image81
    Man from Modestoposted 10 years ago

    There is a good psychology argument for this: people are three times as likely to act on negative emotions as they are to act on positive emotions.

    Meaning, the actually negative audience is overly represented in a vote-up, vote-down system.

    However, I think the vote down should remain. When I give vote downs, it is for one of two reasons:

    1. Extremely poor quality content: short, auto-translated from another language, etc. Or articles posing as experts, but with bad information or ineptitude.

    2. Things that will harm the reader if they get into it ( e.g. witchcraft, etc)

    So, there are good reasons for the vote down.

    What I would like, though, is to know WHO it is that has flagged a hub. Twice, I have had someone start flaming me... and then had a hub flagged. I would like to have a system in which a false-flagger can be punished, to protect the innocent. One of the flagged hubs was booming in daily views. While it was offline for three days, it dropped, and never recovered.

  5. Pollyannalana profile image60
    Pollyannalanaposted 10 years ago

    I hardly use the down anyway and since they both disappear I am not too sure it is not a vote up, who can say? I really think if there are certain rules that you have to have so many words or this or that it should be graded on that and if you don't put in what you should no one can pull you out. How is it fair for some to do the work and others don't and get a free ride? Do rules mean anything here or not? I really would like to know. People always jump in to tell you the rules but we have eyes. Is it a popularity contest or what?
    I agree with the man about a false flagger, surely they deserve a punishment! Some of us put serious work in our hubs and then a trouble maker is allowed to blow it all up.

  6. Faceless39 profile image90
    Faceless39posted 10 years ago

    I totally agree.  Not only that, but if you make enemies (or ex-boyfriends) they can systematically vote all your hubs down, all day every day.  I think it's time for it to go.

  7. sportgames profile image60
    sportgamesposted 10 years ago

    The vote down must be there.
    If a hub is great I will give it a vote up
    If a hub is ok I don't vote
    if a hub is horrible I vote don

  8. profile image0
    wilbury4posted 10 years ago

    Should keep both the "Vote Up" and "Vote Down" buttons but take away the anonymity, if someone is prepared to vote something down they should be prepared to do it openly by name. Maybe an option to give reason for such votes could be made available.

  9. profile image0
    khmohsinposted 10 years ago

    I totally agree with you. Not only that, but if you make enemies then they can vote all your hubs down.

  10. Cardisa profile image88
    Cardisaposted 10 years ago

    Would that make sense? I mean shouldn't things be in balance? How about no button at all so all answers remain neutral and on the same level as every one else. The answers would be ordered the way they were replied. So no answer would seem more special than the other as all answers would be made equal.

    Answers that make fun of or are insulting would be flagged so a special feature would be there for that.

    But that's the reason why HP has a vote down button, that answers that are rude, irrelevant and insulting be voted down. So if there are no red buttons then we would have to deal with the consequences of being insulted by rude hubbers, or just accept the stupid answers.

  11. rLcasaLme profile image74
    rLcasaLmeposted 10 years ago

    Without it, Hubpages will just be a clutter of junk articles. It's a way to help our moderators or HubPages system to easily spot low quality ones that shames HubPages.

  12. athena2011 profile image56
    athena2011posted 10 years ago

    I would be fine with that. I avoid negativity, whenever possible, so would never hit the Vote Down button unless something was really really bad, offensive, abusive or something like that.

  13. rob_allen profile image71
    rob_allenposted 10 years ago

    That would be cool. i don't use Vote Down button ever. I don't see the need of clicking it. I guess it would be a waste of my energy if I click on it instead of clicking the home button. I agree. The Vote Up button is more than enough.

  14. thejeffriestube profile image60
    thejeffriestubeposted 10 years ago

    I feel the vote down button is critical, especially when Hub Hopping. Sometimes, you have to be able to say, "No, this should not be included amongst the work of other hard-working writers." In light of how Google views the site as a whole, it's important to cull obvious junk.

  15. profile image0
    klanguedocposted 10 years ago

    Both are important. The vote down is a must for flagging inappropriate content. Otherwise you either use the vote up if you really like the hub or don't vote all. Voting down on someones work is in bad form, unless like I said, a hub is a thinly veiled promo piece.

  16. Marcy Goodfleisch profile image88
    Marcy Goodfleischposted 10 years ago

    I prefer keeping the Vote Down option as well as Vote Up. In just a week on the site (while hopping hubs) I've seen poor translations, promotional pieces, blog or diary writings and even adult content and vulgar language. I've flagged things that are violations, and I vote them down.

    There are also some stellar writers here. I make positive comments as often as possible, and I vote up at the same time (plus interesting, or funny, etc.). The only time I dont respond at all is when the topic just doesn't appeal to me enough to read it. Then I keep hopping without reading.

    If the good writers here want to maintain a quality environment (which will only help everyone), the site needs to be informed of Hubs that are substandard or in violation.

    Just my opinion.

  17. Pikachusif profile image60
    Pikachusifposted 10 years ago

    I somewhat disagree with having a vote up button only, because it destroys a reader's ability to spread his\her view on a certain post or subject. I would certainly like to vote down if I thought something was extremely unfavorable, even though I do not like to put others down or demolish their spirits for writing. A simple opinion!

                                                                 -The Yellow Blur, Pikachusif


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)