If you check the forum posters who are now most active in politics, you will notice, sneako, that they are all so-called conservatives now. (I call them 'so-called' because many of the more senior hubbers here would call them another thing.) The actual truth is that most of the 'left' leaning hubbers (often that is in the mind of these so-called conservatives, as we have all kinds of people here, often more moderate than anything else...I would also say the rational) have voluntarily elected to stop posting in the forums, because the words here that pass as debate (and resulting nastiness) are not worth their time or the intrusion of bad feeling in their lives. I am one these. I could name a dozen more.
I think some here are simply interested in controversy and drama of a certain nature...who knows why. I certainly haven't seen any one of certain group banned in a long time. But then, I haven't paid that much attention. This post just struck me--it seems to want to invite the drama once again. I like debate, but cannot say I understand the rest of this stuff.
Lita I appreciate your observations and it can be bad. The two individuals I'm referring to are consistant liberal debaters and that was their position in these treads. I come to play, I could careless what anyone believes. I like honest discourse but this little tattle-tale crap is more offensive than anything that was said.
I know that you are OK underneath everything, Sneako...I saw that. lol You remind me of our builder friend here, Tom. We had that conversation a while back, and I want you to know I respected what you said and did that one night.
I think its important to remember that we are all real people here (well, at least some of us are)...and to realize that even though this is an internet forum and we're on keyboards, this is still like talking to someone. Some of the stuff that goes on here recently is beyond the pale...
Anyway, I'm just responding to you, and now I'm off again. Good night.
Both comments were made to individuals in a left vs right debate. I'm not innocent but I'm not an ax murderer either:
1. one hubber was attacking another hubber and he'd done it before and he'd done it to me. He likes to imply you are an idiot with a reading comprehension problem. I told him to back off and he was a pansy.(my offense)
2. The debater stated he wouldn't take a bigoted position to another hubber. I said something to the affect a another piece wisdom from an enlightened progressive, ding. And I was warned again.
I asked for clarification on this procedure and it's done in response to complaints. There may be other criteria but thats what was told to me.
I think HP is a forum for discussing all matters. Some use all kinds of foul language, only for their satisfaction. But what is worrying, the HP allows all kinds of abuses by some hubbers and deny chance to reply to their abusive comments. HP may please list some abusive words and delete the comments, if and when they are used by hubbers. For me, HP is like reading a newspaper only.
You are talking about me. See, if you read something and don't understand it either admit it or don't respond. It is appropriate for me to point out that you didn't get something or assigned a value to it that's not there.
At one point I stated that I'd read an idiotic statement. I didn't call the person who made the statement an idiot.
A fine point that seems to be lost to many here.
As you should have been. You, A Texan, and ledefensetech invade a topic and shout down anyone you disagree with. It amounts to spamming. It certainly isn't a discussion; it is most certainly not a debate. Not with the three of you calling anyone and everyone you disagree with a) a commie, b) a socialist, or c) an Obama apologist.
If you don't get it you don't get it. There's no magic here.
I don't engage in debates in the forums as most often they are just a mud-throwing contest between equally poorly-argued points. Besides flagging Hubs that genuinely run afoul of the Hub TOS keeps me busy enough.
I'm not quite sure what this particular post is about, but I had somebody flag some of my hubs which are totally not even political. I personally think they did it because I befriended an outspoken hubber. He had a dozen or so flagged the same day it was done to me, and the day after we posted comments on each other's hubs. So, I guess it's the same, it's reporting for immaturity instead of something valid.
It's their way to silent the conservative side of the forums. If you say anything they can twist into some kind of personal attack then they report you and your banned for three days. It's a sick twisted little game but thats their whole game.
I'll don't have politics on my hubs. I just do Shakespeare, but I do post in some controversial forum threads. But I've never been known to back down from anybody and I don't have my hubs monetized so I couldn't care less about being suspended, I'm still going to say what I think and if it becomes a witch hunt then I will start posting about politics!
You may be right, but this has not been my experience. My views are pretty conservative, but I have never been banned by HP even though I've expressed conservative (liberals would say "extreme") views about abortion, the death penalty, & the president's ineptness.
Hey Misha, quit snoozin, you got hugs to pass around that are overdue hehehe
I don't get involved either. I get busy with Hubs, life or help when or if asked n try to keep up with me fans. I find it better to keep at constructive activities rather than sidetracked. Jus my own thoughts.
Personally I think its riduculas people being banned for speakin what they think,..for those who can't take the heat,..perhaps they should stay out of the forums. I get beaten up from time to time in these forums,..but its all good,...forums are ment for people to speak on. But again thats my opinion,..and not ment to affend anyone,..
I'm with ya on that,..I too got better things to do to than turn people in because they threw sticks and stones,..LOL. Perhaps when those people come into the forum to start drama, we all should leave as a group,...LOL. Just a thought. (Not to affend anyone though)
Haha! I'm naturally flame proof, so I don't let what anyone says bother me too much and if I find myself too close to a topic I bow out, relax, and try to come back with a fresh and open mind. After all ... debates and arguments are never the same thing. Debates stand to make a point, whereas arguments just tend to make someone mad.
Haven't had the problem yet, but wanted to take the opportunity to thank you, Prometheus, for a post on another political thread. Was in a hurry last night (or maybe it was lazy, hard to tell sometimes) and neglected to jump right on it.
Anyway, you mentioned that your conservative grandfather had a saying:
"If you're young and you're not liberal, you have no heart; if you're old and you're not conservative, you have no brains."
I love that, understand it, and actually believe it says it all. Not until I read your post did I think back over my own voting record and realize (now that I'm "old") that (whew!) I do apparently have both brains and a heart.
Don't mean to hijack - I read that too & laughed. I remember Dennis Miller saying that years ago. Does that make me old enough that I have to vote conservative now? Although I do find myself drifting right just a little bit...
wield words wisely . and your ban proof. this is a forum not a debate . the civil exchanging of contrary ideas. a debate to me is a peeing contest between opposing self righteous party's . ultimately ending with both pro and con leaving with their shoes wet.... that my friends is poetry .
Somehow. Some way can't all of us find a way to get along? There was a time on HP when nobody at HP had to patrol the forums maybe if everyone took time to read the rules there would not be so much conflict. If someone peeves me off I ignore them or come back in a positive way without harming another feelings or thoughts, I try to think before I speak but lately there has been a lot of testoserone in here. lolololo
"As you should have been. You, A Texan, and ledefensetech invade a topic and shout down anyone you disagree with. It amounts to spamming. It certainly isn't a discussion; it is most certainly not a debate. Not with the three of you calling anyone and everyone you disagree with a) a commie, b) a socialist, or c) an Obama apologist."
Just because your arguments don't hold water does not mean we are keeping you from spouting them. Are you afraid of the mean men behind the computer screen?
Just say in plain english what we can expect from you. The truth about how you handle being called on your cute little comments. Just let everybody know before they make the mistake thinking you're a friend.
I never retracted any statement and I stand by my assessment. Well you did piss me off so I did a little checking, you can come clean fill in the blank or I'll post what I was told, I already know the answer.
My offense came after what you said to someone else. I don't like bullies(verbal or physical)and will stand up for anyone. My comment was in reguard to your comment to them. You've made the same comments to me but I didn't care until I was banned. That pissed me off! So I wrote some e-mails and found out how it all works.
So how does it work? Surely they review the "offending" post before making a decision.
As to bullying there's a lot of that from both sides. But again, if I say that there's a reading for comprehension problem I'm being quite serious. It's not an attempt at bullying, it is a clear and unambiguous observation on my part.
Heck if I get banned I'll take it like a man and come back at the end of three days and apologize.
Well they can't read every post, I'm sure thats because they have lives, when someone points out a potential violation then they get involved. They review the comment and handle it. So, two of you did exactly the same thing immediatly after a post and exactly the same thing happened and your partner has disapeared since. The funny thing is that I never said who the hubbers were but everyone knew their style so they figured it out immediatly. You constantly bring up the personal attack crap anyway! The majority agree don't debate with those who aren't your friends because this is what happens. I appologized to you once I won't again.
They do 'review' for "what they think" is a personal attack (TOS), Liam Bean. Usually, this is for calling people a name--however, within this process on the part of hubpages are personal biases towards certain people (I might also say this site is located in SF...although the biases are not always political). Also, limitation as to vision of what connotes attacks (the disruption of forums with trolling does not seem to be an issue to them) is apparent.
There was a time when the forum was more of a gentleman's game with banter, both 'sides' were more respectful and people had fun. This hasn't been the case in a while.
In essence, fine points are misunderstood not only by certain members, but the moderators themselves. I understand what you are saying perfectly about calling an idea stupid as compared to calling a person stupid. You can count on few here, honestly, from my observations to do so.
I could see if the people who open a topic about something and then scream foul play when other people's arrogance gets the better of them and they wrongly or purposely "call out" someone.
Similiar to the incident the other night, when spiderpam accused cosette of being a liar.
A person cannot be a liar, until proven to be the case. If you have no proof, like real evidence to present, if not then it's hearsay at best.
But to open a topic about this particular incident(s), is ridiculous. Not to mention, it creates hard feeling between others and is completely disruptive to the entire process hubpages present to the public.
The simple fact that other people are now debating this issue, is again ridiculous.
People, seriously, is there something better to do with our time, instead of responding to "childish" immature, awww I hurt your feelings.
Get over yourselves and move on.
You can respond all you like, I'm not coming back to see what you said...because I don't believe this is worth discussing.
I only wanted to bring up the fact that it's "childish" and should already be done and over with.
Want to talk in another forum, I'll be glad to engage.
Here's a totally stupid question from someone who isn't involved in politics ... I know, that make *me* stupid as well, but it is what is is ...
Knowing everyone views politics differently and no one ever wants to be wrong, do you guys ever expect to agree on anything? I mean ... politics is a very polarized debate arena, just like religion. Some are pro-abortion some are antiabortion, some are for more gun control and some are for less, some are all for big businesses and some are for small.
Day in and day out you guys fight a losing battle trying to beat your opinion into an equally matched foe who believes differently. So, when all else fails, you launch scud missiles at each other. Is there a winner when it's all over? Nope. All parties still believe the same the next day. I've been a victim of this logic bomb myself, believing it is possible to win over someone with the right argument ... but there is no right argument. You disagree because you see the issues differently and each is totally 100% right about their views when taken from the perspective of their own belief. What makes them wrong is the fact that their perspective isn't the same as yours.
Express your views ... concede that others will disagree ... it's not about being silenced or silencing others ... it's about letting other people know your stance.
Do people debate over the best vacation spot? Maybe some, but very little. Why? Because vacationing isn't a polarized argument. It's not ... sunny paradise or winter wonderland.
So, of course things will get heated and people will attack one another, sensing the futility of not getting their voice out over all others. But at the end of the day, the one who shouts the loudest isn't the victim - they're the town crier, and we know this job often went in medieval days to the lesser educated who could not seek employment elsewise. As such, fighting to win makes you lose ... so it is better to share your viewpoint than to try to bat it into your foe with a titanium rod.
Trust me ... I've been through this in the religious forums and that's as polarized as it gets. You're debating with (whether you care to believe it or not) intelligent people, and intelligent people will typically fight back when clubbed.
Want to silence the opposition? Lower your own volume and they will lower theirs to hear what you are saying.
Of course. And I recently had a debate on here with a very good debater, with who I agreed on much...some 'sock' account called 'thetfin'...even though we came at things from a totally different perspective.
It is possible that debate be an exchange of ideas--very possible and very interesting.
Some here are only around for their own entertainment, however. When these two types of debaters cross--therein lies the problem.
Just an idea I'm tossing out there. How about HP declaring on Monday a blanket forum amnesty for all forum-banned Hubbers?I'm saying Monday so that HP has the weekend to mull the idea over.I am not suggesting any...
I can't help but notice that after a few bannings of prolific forum participants, the forum participation has dropped dramatically.Gone are the days when I had around 3 pages of Hubbers Hangout topics to peruse,...
I am surprised. I yesterday posted this topic 'Can Science explain everything?'. This hubber came out and gave me some answers. Now as I have provided him some reasons, he hot hurt and started to post nasty personal...