Hi everyone! Hope everybody's day is off to a fantastic start.
I had a quick question, and couldn't find an answer after browsing the forums. Does anyone know what the ideal image size is for your Hubs (i.e. the main photo for each of your articles)? I've noticed that when the image is too big, the preview of my Hub (particularly on the vertical sites, such as Owlcation) only shows part of the photo, and not the whole thing. Difficult to explain, but hope that makes sense haha.
I had not landed on Owlcation site. But hope so someday.
It has been suggested that the minimum pixel size should be 1000 on at least one side. I use this all the time and have never had a problem.
I use many photos in my hubs and scale them to 800 x 600 pixels horizontal and 600 x 800 for vertical. That's more than enough for the internet. Larger formats take a lot of time to open and as you said are not properly shown. Of course they have to be sharp in the first place.
That is a great question, Larry. I only have issues if the photo is too small -- too big has not been an issue. The Help Section says "Always use high-resolution, high-quality images."
Thanks everyone! Big help! I'll definitely give that a try
Photos should be at least 520 pixels wide if possible, otherwise you'll get a warning that they're too small. If a photo is exceptionally small, the chances are that it will get snipped by an editor. It's possible to zoom in by clicking/tapping on an image (the process is very convoluted and awkward on articles, and there is an ongoing unfixed bug doing this on mobile devices). Zoomed photos display at a max res of 1024 pixels wide. Anything higher resolution you upload will be scaled down to this size, so there's not much point using higher res images. Compressing images (while maintaining pixel dimensions) before uploading is always a good idea to reduce the load time of a page for readers.
I asked in a thread some time ago what's the smallest aspect ratio (width/height) for an image before it gets cropped, but never got an answer. You can try experimenting with something that has a grid on it, or stuff at the top and bottom and see what you lose. I have used an image 1024 x 1394 and it worked fine, but that's about the limit.
Thank you so much! Very very helpful! I will try this.
I always thought they wanted larger pictures too, when we had to change all our hubs and pictures. Now they took one of my oldest hubs, and changed full sized pictures of flowers to thumbnails. I wasn't aware they wanted tiny pictures now. I don't even know how to make thumbnails. This is the hub some editor just worked on: https://dengarden.com/gardening/Shade-G … ocky-Soil.
Normally, if the pictures were not the size of the hostas or impatiens, I would have been told they were too small. I give up.
Hi, there I am not on dengarden.com/ But I want to study the issue via, the link you provide. The article is not found. Does it seem you have to remove it for re-editing? Let me know when it is publishing again. Thank you.
Images display at a maximum size of 1025 pixels wide after zooming in, so that's what I would aim for. There's no point uploading anything with higher resolution.
I used to have quite large images as a newbie. Then I realized that large images slow the page load. Apparently, people don’t have the patience or possibly good connectivity to wait on slow pages. So, after I changed the size of my images on one particular article, the views doubled in one day.
I try not to have images larger than 900 pixels on one side, and they are typically smaller than that. However, if you have only 2-3 images, it probably doesn’t matter.
Hello, Bede, I am still on HubPages and not on dengarden. I have no idea what is going on there. But the discussion going on the forum is interesting.
However, I realized with that when Marven takes over, photo sizes change from small to large, and I have adjusted that all that.
But I am waiting for a response to a link for studying the challenge further.
Good day, Bede.
Just to show you the effects of compression.
This 1024 pixel wide photo had a 1.2Mb file size on upload.
The next photo has the same dimensions but a quarter the file size on upload.
.....so there's imperceptible difference unless you look very closely.
This is what happens when you take it to the extreme. I compressed the original photo by a factor of about 30.
I just did a test and uploaded a 1024 pixel wide, 411kb image. When I downloaded it, it was reduced to 114kb so HubPages seem to compress images anyway.
https://dengarden.com/gardening/Shade-G … Rocky-Soil
That's the URL at the top of the article. I clicked the first one I posted and got a 404 message.
Maybe I did something wrong. This one leads to the article.
Sometimes an editor will replace a series of consecutive related photos with thumbnails Jean. I queried this with an editor when he was working on one of my hubs and the logic is they don't want a reader to have to scroll through loads of images to get to text. I reversed this edit because my images were diagrams with text on them, illegible as thumbnails and a reader would have to expand them out to realise what they represented.
Hello, Joan, I got it and I had a response. A nice and informative hub. Enjoy the weekend.
Very helpful! This is something I've been trying to figure out since I first joined HubPages a few years ago haha. I will definitely give all these things a try.
Larry, I just reread your question. Here's something I learned from an article by Glen Stok... always make your preview photo square. That way it won't get cropped on one side.
Hi! I think you should focus more on the quality than the size of the photo. Most likely, it is distorted due to the wrong size, but this is easy to fix. For example, you can upscale image size online and increase resolution without quality loss. Also, you can improve image quality by reducing noises and sharpening. To do this, you do not need to look for a Photo Studio, you can do everything online because now there are a lot of programs that do this. If you need any additional information, please contact me, I will help you in any way I can.
by Lionrhod 7 years ago
Been fixing my lens/hubs and this morning I worked on the story about my Dirty Family Secret.Everything looks okay (though I'm concerned how to deal with that duel module) except for one photo in the slideshow.On Squidoo, this photo looked just fine. Hub Pages blow it up huge as possible and of...
by Gina Valley 4 years ago
Hi everyone,Is there a recommended photo size that works best on the site? Also, I thought I read somewhere that there's a specific size that's good to use for the first photo that makes it Pinterest friendly.Thanks so much!
by Billie Kelpin 6 years ago
So, is there an easy way to download all the pictures you uploaded to hubpages? I searched for a hub on this and checked out the image information section, but didn't find the answer. I know I can right-click and paste the images I've imported and I probably have all of these pictures...
by ruthwalker 7 years ago
Hi, was just wondering if anyone knows what is the minimum size for an image (in pixels) that you should use for your hub?I have contacted someone asking to use some of their images and he has asked me to let him know the approximate size I would like, in pixels, width x height. I've had a...
by Eugene Brennan 17 months ago
I'm bringing this topic up again for the third time. Maybe this can be resolved? 520 pixels for an image is pretty useless if the original image is a couple of thousand pixels wide and the detail can't be viewed (doing the two finger gesture thing only shows more pixels and interpolates. It doesn't...
by Sarra Garrett 8 years ago
Ok, I'm so aggravated right now. But that's fine, I'll get over it. What in the world is a pixalated picture. I changed my pictures I can't count on one of my hubs and it was unpublished today. It was on the American Cream Draft Horse which is a rare America horse. Not...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|