To make myself more clear, there are some websites that can block readers from copying and pasting entire passages of text or photos. I know this will not stop all the article theft from plagiarism, but it may thwart some because they’re too lazy to spend the time to copy by hand. They’re more likely to move on to an easier site just like ours ... just an idea since there is such a huge influx of this type of activity.
Anyone else have something to add or feedback on this idea?
That's a great idea. Chasing down websites that steal my article consumes way too much of my time.
I think it's a great idea, too. Especially since we're now on the Maven platform, which has more professional sub-sites, such as Sports Illustrated.
With so much information available on the Internet in our current times, it would behoove the site owners to implement software that thwarts plagiarists from violating the rights of the original authors and diminishing value of the site and subsites.
Excellent idea, Ziyena!
That is a great suggestion. I do think HP and Maven need to do more to stop these bottom feeders from stealing our work, especially since it hurts their bottom line when they don't. I go after each bottom feeder when I notice they steal my work, and I am usually successful in getting them to remove it, especially since I started to fine them.
I agree with you, Ziyena. Plagiarism is a crime, period. I am usually successful in having my stolen work taken down, but I wish HP would do more to address this problem.
That is a good idea. I hope it will be implemented here.
ziyena, I not only like the idea, but welcome it. Very excellent and suggestive. I think also that a type of water-mark should be placed on all our publish articles on both the main site and niche sites.
I wish that would happen too. I just spent an hour chasing down and reporting someone on Facebook who has stolen my best performing article. She even had the bloody cheek to say at the end "It took me a long time to put all this information together, guys."
It's gone now.
Edit: Facebook are still going back and forth... they keep asking me which photo or video I am complaining about. They don't seem to understand the concept of an 'article'.
Wow. I'm sorry to hear that. You're making me think I'd better start checking mine. Do you have any tips on how to go about that?
Yes, it's easy but soul-destroying.
Copy a short section of the article, paste it into Google. Check the results.
But don't stop there. Copy another section and do it again. I usually check three or more times.
There are some you can't do anything about, esp if they are Chinese or Russia sites. Some people paste it in the middle of gobbledegook for some unknown reason. Those pages can't hurt yours.
Then you find the webhost of the infringing site by going to whois.net. Then submit a DMCA, either on their own abuse form or by email. If you need help with that, come back to the forum and ask.
As a last resort, if you can't get it taken down, you can file a notice to Google to have it removed from search results.
Nice hubbers try to contact the site owner first, but I'm way past that now
That's because "the computer says no" and can't find the text or images Sometimes the people who process these reports don't seem to have the cop on to compare both articles and find matching content manually.
I'm wondering if this is wishful thinking. Having worked in corporate with knowledge of the cost of implementing new features can get quite expensive. But, if in the long run it saves HP and its writers from headaches, losing time, money, and manpower. Then, why not? On occasion, I build websites for businesses and this is a practical feature.
I hope this might be a consideration.
I know how to get past copy-paste blockers in 30 seconds, so I imagine actual scammers do it even quicker. And the blocker is an impediment to page-readers and translators that many users depend on. It's a waste of resources and a bad look for any hubs where people are trying to speak about the internet or tech with authority.
It might help to some extent but not a solution. These copycats should be punished by disabling their copied content in internet. I think Google is already on that job once it gets a complaint.
Well. The idea is out there. Perhaps there's something that can be done. Not necessarily my suggestion, but something else to help better the situation. It's obvious by the feedback that there's a concern, and it's been passed on to the powers that be
You all have a wonderful day
by Victoria Van Ness 3 years ago
What's the point in keeping us from linking to our own work in our articles? That's how we increase traffic to our articles!
by Don Bobbitt 8 years ago
HEY! I have an Idea! Why doesn't someone write a Hub on "How to Make Money on HubPages."?Honestly! How many people have to try and tell the rest of us how to make money using HubPages? If a new one pops up right now (like one did a few minutes ago), what are the odds that it will...
by Paul Edmondson 3 years ago
In a very limited release (2 articles, that will expand to dozens in the next month or so) we are testing a new feature and process called Expert Reviews. Our strategy is to satisfy Google and readers with high-quality content. Part of Google's webmaster guidelines discusses E(xpertise)...
by Gable Rhoads 5 years ago
I found an article of mine on this website: eggvan.com. I have issued A DCMA notice, but many other articles I checked were copied from other sites. I did not run across any Hubs, but my article was lifted at Blogger.Also at this site: porkyjuice.com/
by Glenn Stok 4 years ago
I noticed that hubs in niche sites no longer include the "More by this author" section below the hub. Is this just an oversight or was it a decision to drop it on niche sites?
by Maffew James 7 years ago
It's no secret that many Hubbers have been hit by the recent Google 'Panda 4.1' update. Panda is one of Google's key quality algorithms that assesses your content for certain signals that indicate that your readers are happy with the site and user experience offered. If you noticed a sharp traffic...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|