Full marks to the Hubpages computer for recognising that much of the material in my latest hub on Food Labelling Regulations appears on other sites. It ALL appears on other sites.
I took the 1996 Regulations and laboriously updated them, working through each of about 27 sets of amending Regulations to generate something that is simply not available on the Internet - a set of condsolidated regulations incorporating all amendments. If it had been available I would not have spent several days on the job.
My piece is original even though all of it is technically copied.
Where do I go from here?
In cases like this, which are pretty rare, we can grant an exception to the usual penalties that apply to duplicate content (which I have done on your hub). For others that may find themselves in this situation contact us.
I have had this issue several times. It is frustrating when there is a purpose for the "duplicate".
I feel strongly that a disclosure that the author recognizes the duplication and gives full credit to the source whether known or unknown.
Here is a Hub I wrote out of frustration. I had previously unpublished it because I understand the conflict between plagiarism and duplication. Sadly the line between the two is often grey not black and white.
Yet there remain a need at times for duplication:
http://hubpages.com/hub/WWWFGIR-Hub-Pag … Disclosure
Ironically on my Food Safety Hubs I wanted to write on food labeling but knew I would run into the problems you are now experiencing.
For my fluoride and children - I felt I needed a duplicate to showcase the harm to children. I ended up completely rewriting my Hub - some information but it had to have the "duplicate" warning removed. Fluoride is a problem, however, it is a real safety concern for infants
and I felt it needed to be addressed. I was able with allot of rewriting able to skirt the boundaries of "duplicate".
I feel that there should be an automatic way to detail to Hub Pages and to the readers that I know this is substantially a duplicate - I am giving credit, I know it is a "duplicate" and then have the Hub remain at least active.
Gma, as you know, there is a very good reason for the duplicate filter - it helps protect HubPages from spammers.
I would question why, if something is already on the internet, you feel it's necessary to re-quote it? All you have to do is link to it, after all, and the person can read it in its original location.
If, by linking to the original instead of quoting, you don't have enough material left to fill a Hub - well, I'd ask myself why bother? Anyone Googling on the topic is going to find the original source anyway.
As for creating an automated way of letting duplicate content "off the hook" - I think this would be a bad thing, because spammers would certainly try to take advantage of it, even if they had no right to. That would create a lot of extra work for HP.
I have several hubs that I have put other places and they say duplicate. But it doesn't matter, they are still up, I can still earn money. As far as I know, only I see the notification that it is a duplicate.
If you worry about it just write a note mentioning where it was originally published.
I used one article in HP that I had written previously and had posted on my own website...when I posted it on HP it showed as duplicate, but I'm sure it was just a duplicate of my own article. I also quoted from the Bible which I'm sure is used a lot but gave my own story around the particular passage. So, in some cases there will be similar content as people share similar experiences. Not all "duplication" is plagiarism. Sometimes people from completely different places come up with the same idea and write it differently. However, having said all that--so much plagiarism and stolen content happens that it is never wrong to be careful and check things out.
by kbdressman3 years ago
I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I wrote a hub about Mormons being Christians from an inside perspective. A few days after it was published it got moderated for...
by Lyndon Henry6 years ago
Like some other contributors in this forum, I've also just had an article suspended for "duplication". This is an article on grammar rewritten from a small section of my own much longer article on...
by carol stanley5 years ago
I have been doing a series on Astrology and going through one sign at a time. I was careful not to duplicate language though certain things needed repeating. I eliminate two important paragraphs..format is the...
by Disillusioned7 years ago
Have any of you who have re-posted your articles (originally written anywhere else) noticed any specific dip in traffic after recent Google change?I find something amusing. My traffic is never too great to talk about....
by Kate Swanson9 years ago
I was reading a Hub on Hubpages, and was concerned to read the advice that the content we use in our Hubs should be unique, not something we've posted elsewhere on the net.I started out on Helium and have nearly 200...
by Leelin8 years ago
Hi,Thought I would ask here first since I think this will be an easy question.So here it is: I have a hub thats been decided is duplicate content, and says it needs revision. Does that mean there is another hub just...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.